FAHRENHEIT 911 FULL MOVIE IN HD ETC

THIS IS THE ENTIRE FAHRENHEIT 911 MOVIE by Michael Moore in HD. This movie is a prime example of how a literal mountain range of valid exculpatory evidence can be ignored to obstruct justice despite the massive human rights violations and/or displacement of human life and/or loss of human life that incurred thereof. This movie should have been privately screened by the entire U.S. Congress; but it unfortunately never was. > go to: FAHRENHEIT 911 @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXDSFWa kTI&list=PL6oforB7ir5KVvLB8_Lg9tjB925SgByPf +  UNPRECEDENTED @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQ7j7Gv-s5g

> See also: 9-11 Conspiracy Solved Names, Connections, & Details Exposed! @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hhBZJEqoe0A) + Federal judge tosses Iraqi woman’s suit against George W. Bush? But! We do know that George Bush senior invaded Kuwait based upon his own personal financial gain; and that several American oil companies already had the entire country of Iraq mapped out for their own personal corporate financial gain etc BEFORE THE WAR IN IRAQ EVER STARTED!?! > see also: HIGHWAY OF DEATH @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_of_Death

911 COVERUP FALLING APART > When top Bush administration officials immediately and in unison denied knowing that jetliners could be used to attack American landmarks right after 9/11, a number of alert reporters immediately pointed out that this very subject had been under government study for almost a decade. And when U.S. officials immediately released a list of the alleged hijackers, the lie was immediately visible to those with eyes to see: how could they deny knowing this possibility of a massive jetliner attack existed, yet be able to name the alleged hijackers almost instantly because these individuals had been under surveillance for months?

If they could name the alleged hijackers, then they couldn't deny knowing the possibility of using planes as weapons existed, could they?

As astonishing events unfolded after the tragedy — the hasty passage of the Patriot Act (approved by Congress despite virtually no one in Congress reading it before voting for it), which nullified large portions of the U.S. Constitution; constant "terror alerts" about which no evidence was ever produced; the war against Afghanistan which was claimed to be a response to 9/11 yet was planned long before 9/11; and the war against Iraq, which was waged because that nation supposedly threatened America with weapons of mass destruction (which have never and will never be found, unless planted) and had ties to that mystery terror group called Al-Qaeda (since proven to be lies) — many more millions of Americans began to understand that the new peril they were in was not from some shadowy worldwide terror group but from unscrupulous demagogues in Washington who would invent any story — and kill any number of people — in order to improve the fortunes of the very military/industrial power brokers who illegally brought them to power in the first place. > go to: http://www.serendipity.li/wot/911_coverup_falling_apart.htm

THE DEAFNESS BEFORE THE STORM > On April 10, 2004, the Bush White House declassified that daily brief — and only that daily brief — in response to pressure from the 9/11 Commission, which was investigating the events leading to the attack. Administration officials dismissed the document’s significance, saying that, despite the jaw-dropping headline, it was only an assessment of Al Qaeda’s history, not a warning of the impending attack. While some critics considered that claim absurd, a close reading of the brief showed that the argument had some validity. > go to: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0 

 > Note: Ralph Nader has been asking for locking cockpit doors on airliners since the 1972 Olympics.

LOVE YOUR ENEMIES? > John woke up sometime after midnight on September 11th, 2001 to Donald Rumsfeld on ABC's Nightline talking about "cutting the tail off the dog" in regards to cutting back the U.S. Military and going more space-based with new military technology. Was Mister Rumsfelds' "cutting the tail off the dog" comment a reference to the World Trade Center buildings which were about to be razed? Was this some kind of "GO" signal? Or was it simply a reference to cutting back the military; which clearly DID NOT happen after the events of September 11th? (Mister Rumsfeld was in a newly fortified part of the Pentagon when a missile impacted that part of the building. Was this payback for his threat to cut back the military? -- It's like shutting down an entire slaughterhouse and laying off the employees -- it's just not gonna go over too good [and especially with employees who have access to weapons of mass destruction with little or no oversight]) Instead the U.S. Military was bolstered like never before; receiving more money than ever and therefore making United Defense stocks soar. (a stock both the Bin Laden and Bush families owned). > GO TO: VIDEO OF MISSILE HITTING PENTAGON ON 9/11 @ http://www.theeventchronicle.com/911/newly-released-video-missile-hitting-pentagon-911/#prettyPhoto

QUESTION: 1) Why did a U.S. Military weapons specialist approach John at the old Acapulco Restaurant in Santa Clara shortly after the 911 attacks and claim the FBI had been interrogating him regarding the attacks for possible involvement in them?

 ANSWERS: A) "The United States government has a long history of denying responsibility for destructive and provocative actions. If the United States government wants to help, they can admit their culpability and compensate victims for the damages this attack caused..." -- John 1:1 (go to: http://misinformation.net/) > B) "This (9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder..." -- Stanley Hilton > http://www.rense.com/general57/aale.htm

> THE BOTTOM LINE: Judges are often essentially nothing more than government CEOs and/or "foxes who watch the hen house"; tossing lawsuits to save the government money and their reputation; regardless of (and oftentimes especially due to) their validity. > go to: http://www.sfchronicle.com/nation/article/Federal-judge-tosses-Iraqi-woman-s-suit-against-5979253.php

NOTE: John was 10 years old back in 1972 when the Nixon scandal hit the fan; and while many likely thought it was the wrong idea to expose the corruption that existed at the federal level (go to: http://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers/) and yet others feared the  civil unrest that would inevitably ensue -- once the dust finally settled; the unprecedented events of 1972 brought about massive change within government; and roughly 3 decades of relative prosperity (that is; until evil geniuses within the Republican party were able to finally forcefully turn the ship around once again in September of 2001 >see also:1972; 1992; 2008; X).

POLITICAL ABUSE OF PSYCHIATRY

POLITICAL ABUSE OF PSYCHIATRY is the misuse of psychiatric diagnosis, detention and treatment for the purposes of obstructing the fundamental human rights of certain groups and individuals in a society. In other words, abuse of psychiatry including one for political purposes is deliberate action of getting citizens certified, who, because of their mental condition, need neither psychiatric restraint nor psychiatric treatment. Psychiatrists have been involved in human rights abuses in states across the world when the definitions of mental disease were expanded to include political disobedience. As scholars have long argued, governmental and medical institutions code menaces to authority as mental diseases during political disturbances. Nowadays, in many countries, political prisoners are sometimes confined and abused in mental institutions. Psychiatric confinement of sane people is a particularly pernicious form of repression. > go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry

The use of psychiatry for political purposes has been a major subject of debate within the world psychiatric community during the second half of the 20th century. The issue became prominent in the 1970s and 1980s due to the systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, where approximately one-third of the political prisoners were locked up in psychiatric hospitals. The issue caused a major rift within the World Psychiatric Association, from which the Soviets were forced to withdraw in 1983. They returned conditionally in 1989. Political abuse of psychiatry took also place in other socialist countries and on a systematic scale in Romania, and during the first decade of the 21st century, it became clear that systematic political abuse of psychiatry is also happening in the People's Republic of China. The article discusses the historical background to these abuses and concludes that the issue had a major impact on the development of concepts regarding medical ethics and the professional responsibility of physicians. > go to: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2800147/ 

And due to the inside job of September 11th, 2001 (go to: 9-11 Conspiracy Solved Names, Connections, & Details Exposed! @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hhBZJEqoe0A) legal novices in local government thought (and still likely think) they actually had good reason and/or some kind of official legal approval to violate individual human rights and/or destabilize activists by putting them on the same level as terrorists; much like how the federal government destabilizes rebel leaders in other countries > go to: REBEL LEADER LIK ROPER @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2008/06/rebel-leader-lik-roper.html.

But! as it turns out; the USA Patriot Act was actually drafted a few weeks before the 9-11 attacks; and not only did a female FBI agent raise red flags about a CIA flight training school which could have averted the attacks (and instead essentially assisted in them); but Senator Diane Feinstein even went as far as warning Vice President Dick Cheney that something big was about to happen a few days before the 9-11 attacks. Mister Cheney responded with "come back in a month". (?!?) Therefore; Mister Cheney (who was Dick Nixon's right hand man. In other words; the most crooked individual in U.S. history) is either GROSSLY NEGLIGENT; OR WAS COMPLICIT IN THE ATTACKS. 

 (Adding to this; ACLU records show that shortly after the 9-11 attacks the FBI admitted to actively destabilizing activists for 25 years prior (and especially black activists); and the USA Patriot Act did nothing more than turn this dirty little secret into law)

Furthermore; it is against the law to discriminate against those with disabilities (and especially if those disabilities are clearly imagined for political purposes; as they are with John). Therefore; discriminatory actions taken against John were not only illegal; but also EXTREMELY unethical and quite clearly based in utter stupidity and/or the violation of John's human rights.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CALL THE COPS?

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CALL THE COPS > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlY9C6pzxKc > Warning: This music video by artist Rob Hustle may contain graphic content that children and/or police and/or other government personnel may find offensive or even dangerous. But it is what goes on every day here in America; therefore it needs to be given a second look. It is a compilation of images showing various instances of police violence against the very same people police are sworn to protect and serve. Let this serve as a sad commentary on the sorry state of police behavior all across America at this point in history. > Photo source: Phoenix Copwatch > http://phoenixcopwatch.wordpress.com/category/police-brutality/

"Police attacks on American people should be considered attacks against all American people" - John

GASLIGHTING AND/OR PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS AND/OR PSY-OPS

A) GASLIGHTING and/or gas-lighting is a form of mental abuse in which false information is presented with the intent of making victims doubt their own memory, perception, and sanity.  Instances may range simply from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred, up to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. B) GASLIGHTING is a form of emotional abuse where the abuser manipulates situations repeatedly to trick the victim into distrusting his or her own memory and perceptions. Gas-lighting is an insidious form of abuse. It makes victims question the very instincts that they have counted on their whole lives, making them unsure of anything. Gas-lighting makes it very likely that victims will believe whatever their abusers tell them regardless as to their own experience of the situation. Gas-lighting often precedes other types of emotional and physical abuse because the victim of gas-lighting is more likely to remain in other abusive situations as well. 

GO TO: A) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting. + B) http://www.healthyplace.com/abuse/emotional-psychological-abuse/gaslighting-definition-techniques-and-being-gaslighted/

EXAMPLE: 1) Santa Clara Police Officer Gabriel Seagrave suggested to John that John was NOT an activist at a City of Santa Clara 2007 administrative hearing; even though in adjacent Sunnyvale John had passed out roughly 10,000 fliers which ultimately brought about the Full Circle Farm in Sunnyvale. John even re-directed an entire public hearing to the Peterson Middle School cafeteria; and was stalked by a Sunnyvale DPS Officer in the process. (a meeting which would have happened at the Sunnyvale Council Chambers > go to: http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/02/voter-intimidation.html).

And Officer Seagrave even tried to downplay John being attacked by Mister Olenak; EVEN THOUGH MISTER OLENAK ADMITTED TO THIS ATTACK AT AN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING IN FRONT OF JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO JUNIOR; AND TWO SANTA CLARA POLICE OFFICERS!?! AND THESE SAME OFFICERS TOOK NO ACTION TO ARREST MISTER OLENAK AT THIS TIME!?! INSTEAD; THESE TWO CHICKENSHIT POLICE OFFICERS FURTHER VIOLATED JOHN'S CIVIL RIGHTS BY SHOWING UP TO THIS SHAM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING WITH BULLY CLUBS CLANKING IN A LAME AND ULTIMATELY UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE JOHN!?! Adding to this; Officers Seagrave and Lopez and the entire evil Olenak clan held John's father against his will after this hearing; violating John's father's civil rights as well. (Mister Olenak threatened John's father on the same morning Mister Olenak attacked John).  

GO TO: MISTER OLENAK'S ADMISSION OF GUILT @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/06/mister-olenaks-admission-of-guilt.html  + REST IN PEACE MOM AND BROTHER CARL @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/03/rest-in-peace-mom-and-brother-carl.html  > Shortly after this administrative hearing; Officer Seagrave was promoted to Internal Affairs; likely to ward off any damning investigations. 

2) After being repeatedly harassed and stalked and menaced etc for a number of years; John then called the Sunnyvale police after having his civil rights egregiously violated in the street by the same gang of idiot punks who were bothering him in an aggravated fashion for so many years. (go to: POLICE-SANCTIONED GANG ACTIVITY (CONTINUED) @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHoPZYXSmXU).  

Sunnyvale DPS Lieutenant Simpson wrongfully suggested John was "5150" and/or mentally unstable after John had his civil rights egregiously violated by idiot punk Jake Paolinetti and friends; using intimidation and coercion while backing John up about 30 feet with his camera. (Jake Paolinetti is clearly the aggressor in this incident) And while John has been a fan of the rock band Van Halen for a number of years; and their usage of the "5150" term (Note: Eddie Van Halen's recording studio is named "5150") John does not appreciate how Lieutenant Simpson used gas-lighting and/or psy-ops to smear John's reputation and/or distract from the truth about the situation. 

After John called the police to the scene; "Officer Bullshit" [and/or O.B.] responded with other Sunnyvale DPS members including Lieutenant Simpson; O.B. immediately asked John if John had a criminal record. When John responded with "NO"; Officer Bullshit then said "BULLSHIT!". Adding to this; while John was being interrogated by Lieutenant Simpson; O.B. was rolling his eyes and making funny faces behind Lieutenant Simpson's back; as if O.B. did not agree with Lieutenant Simpson. And this was likely not a "good cop/bad cop" routine as O.B. seemed like he really meant it. 

Note: John later saw O.B. on guard down at the front of the Superior Court in Sunnyvale a few months later; and O.B. was very cool to John once again at this time; leading John to believe O.B. is actually on John's side in this case.

3) Psychological Operations are largely responsible for the delusional fantasies the Rebholtz daughter and/or even John's sister Kris entertain and/or entertained about John. With the corporate/government-controlled television and print media obsessively focusing upon various shooting rampages over the last few years (probably creating even more shooting rampages in the process by popularizing them; and also causing a bunch of knee-jerk reactions by police departments like the Sunnyvale and Santa Clara Police responding with a S.W.A.T. team to a duck feeding litter gatherer); a seed of paranoid thought has been planted in the vulnerable minds of many individuals regarding this ugly phenomenon. And this in turn has created a sort of "mass-delusional state" of sorts among many people who view this psy-ops news media propaganda on a daily basis.

NOTE: There are different unofficial terms for psychological attacks and abuse that people may suffer from. Gang stalking has already been introduced in earlier articles (see link below) as a group of people in a community who target an individual with the end goal of breaking that individual down in a covert operation (mainly psychological, causing the person to think he or she is going crazy in some cases). > http://www.empowher.com/mental-health/content/gaslighting-psychological-manipulation-extreme

SEE ALSO: PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS AND/OR PSY OPS @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_Operations_%28United_States%29 + PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS/WARFARE @ http://www.psywarrior.com/psyhist.html + PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS IS MY SPECIALTY: Confessions Of A Covert Agent @ http://www.rense.com/general82/psy.htm

Note: Modern television news etc broadcasts are nothing more than an extension of Project MKULTRA > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra

STUDY FINDS COURTS GIVE PROSECUTORS LEEWAY ON DISCLOSING EVIDENCE

MORE THAN 50 YEARS AGO; the U.S. Supreme Court said prosecutors, who have much more access to crime-scene evidence than defense lawyers, must turn over any information they find that might help the defendant. But when they fail to turn over favorable evidence, courts these days seldom do anything about it, according to a new study co-authored by a Santa Clara University law professor. The nationwide study examined 210 cases over a five-year period in which prosecutors had withheld evidence that defense lawyers -- when they later learned about it -- claimed they could have used to get an acquittal or a lesser sentence. In 188 of those cases — nearly 90 percent — federal courts ruled that the evidence, while potentially favorable to the defendant, wasn’t important enough to have made a difference, the report said. 

> go to: http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Study-finds-courts-give-prosecutors-leeway-on-5926266.php > By Bob Egelko Published 4:18 pm, Sunday, November 30, 2014 

EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW? It is not possible to attain justice if prosecutors essentially working above the law are allowed to ignore exculpatory evidence that could exonerate suspected individuals. This is an obstruction of justice. Prosecutors need to be held legally accountable (and/or aggressively federally prosecuted and/or incarcerated) for leaving out key pieces of evidence that could be seen as favorable to defendants. This is just part of the reason why at least some people consider government to be conspiratorial at times; because one bad prosecutor can bring about a world of injustice.

> SEE ALSO: ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE @

http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/02/surveillance-footage-all-relevant.html + VARIOUS QUESTIONABLE COVER UPS BY THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE AND/OR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AND/OR THE SUNNYVALE AND/OR SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENTS ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/07/various-criminal-andor-illegal-cover.html + EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/equal-justice-under-law.html + EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW? Pt II @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/reverse-discrimination.html + INSTITUTIONALIZED GENDER DISCRIMINATION @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/institutionalized-gender-discrimination.html

PATTERN AND PRACTICE

Pattern and Practice
This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice.

Types of misconduct covered include, among other things:
1. Excessive Force (see: Officer Pablo Lopez)
2. Discriminatory Harassment (see: Officer Don Paolinetti and/or Tom Foley)
3. False Arrest (see: Officer Pablo Lopez)
4. Coercive Sexual Conduct
5. Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests (see: Officers Pablo Lopez and Gabriele Seagrave)

go to: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/federal-statutes

CONCLUSION: The Santa Clara and/or Sunnyvale police departments are both clearly irresponsible at the administration of juvenile justice and/or the incarceration of juveniles (Jake Paolinetti and friends etc); and/or similarly irresponsible when it comes to depriving adult persons of their rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and/or laws of the United States. It is my belief the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that various violations have occurred. > go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/06/pattern-of-negligent-behavior-over-time.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/07/various-criminal-andor-illegal-cover.html

NOTE: The word "persons" lacks specificity...

BAIT AND SWITCH: THE SANTA CLARA CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

When John recently submitted his latest claim form to the City of Santa Clara; he apparently failed to fill the form out correctly. This caused the City Attorney's office to contact John and give him until January of 2015 to correct the mistakes then re-submit the form; also suggesting John contact an attorney to help him fill out the form. So John then called the Santa Clara City Attorney's office asking for help in filling out the form; only to be retaliated against for calling. 

John then spoke to one of the City Attorney's female assistants; who promptly hung up the phone on John. John then called back and spoke to yet another female assistant; only to be retaliated against by accused John of "harassing" her by asking for help!?! Instead of offering assistance; they attempted to unlawfully intimidate and/or coerce John; who then sent an email the very next day to President Obama: > sent Nov 26 (11 days ago) to President & Santa Clara City Attorney: 

"Mister Obama; I have been dealing with the City of Santa Clara for about ten years now regarding civil rights violations etc; but the city has been doing nothing but playing games with me and my life and rights. The CIty Attorney even sent me a letter telling me that I did not fill out the claim form correctly; therefore I need to get and attorney to help me fill it out. So I called the City Attorney's office asking for help; AND THE B#%CH HAD THE GALL OF SAYING I WAS HARASSING THEM! CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT SHIT!? so...anyway...the federal government needs to finally crack down on this crooked city ASAP; because I am tired of playing baby games with these idiots...thanks..."

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241

Conspiracy Against Rights / Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141

This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).  

go to: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/federal-statutes