REVEALED: HOW THE FBI COORDINATED THE CRACKDOWN ON OCCUPY

Police used teargas to drive back protesters following an attempt by the Occupy supporters to shut down the city of Oakland. Photograph: Noah Berger/AP

It was more sophisticated than we had imagined: new documents show that the violent crackdown on Occupy last fall – so mystifying at the time – was not just coordinated at the level of the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and local police. The crackdown, which involved, as you may recall, violent arrests, group disruption, canister missiles to the skulls of protesters, people held in handcuffs so tight they were injured, people held in bondage till they were forced to wet or soil themselves – was coordinated with the big banks themselves. 

The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, in a groundbreaking scoop that should once more shame major US media outlets (why are nonprofits now some of the only entities in America left breaking major civil liberties news?), filed this request. The document – reproduced here in an easily searchable format – shows a terrifying network of coordinated DHS, FBI, police, regional fusion center, and private-sector activity so completely merged into one another that the monstrous whole is, in fact, one entity: in some cases, bearing a single name, the Domestic Security Alliance Council. And it reveals this merged entity to have one centrally planned, locally executed mission. The documents, in short, show the cops and DHS working for and with banks to target, arrest, and politically disable peaceful American citizens.

The documents, released after long delay in the week between Christmas and New Year, show a nationwide meta-plot unfolding in city after city in an Orwellian world: six American universities are sites where campus police funneled information about students involved with OWS to the FBI, with the administrations' knowledge; banks sat down with FBI officials to pool information about OWS protesters harvested by private security; plans to crush Occupy events, planned for a month down the road, were made by the FBI – and offered to the representatives of the same organizations that the protests would target; and even threats of the assassination of OWS leaders by sniper fire – by whom? Where? – now remain redacted and undisclosed to those American citizens in danger, contrary to standard FBI practice to inform the person concerned when there is a threat against a political leader. 

> GO TO:http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coordinated-crackdown-occupy + OCCUPY SUNNYVALE @ https://www.facebook.com/pages/Occupy-Sunnyvale/158329944263338?ref=h + + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/04/officers-smith-and-ochoa.html

 NOTE: This is DIRECT evidence the seemingly purposeful negligence on the part of the Sunnyvale police department was very real; as the Sunnyvale police WRONGFULLY thought they did not have to protect and serve John as they so do for others; as promised in their oaths...this is TOTAL BULLSHIT and UNACCEPTABLE...The COITELPRO era is now officially OVER; so DEAL WITH IT! -- QUESTION: Did you know right after September 11th, 2001; THE FBI ADMITTED TO ACTIVELY DESTABILIZING ACTIVISTS FOR 25 YEARS BEFORE 9-11; AND ESPECIALLY BLACK ACTIVISTS!? THE USA PATRIOT ACT WAS WRITTEN TWO WEEKS BEFORE SEPTEMBER 11TH, 2001; AND MADE THIS DIRTY LITTLE SECRET INTO LAW!?

INCIDENT ON 15 JUNE 2013 / EV13-166-206

On June 15th, 2013 at 1:45 pm; the vehicle seen in the photo slowly drove by Johns' residence honking the horn as the occupants of the vehicle yelled obscenities out the window as they have done numerous times before over the last 8 years since about the year 2007 (go to: http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/08/faggots-around-1130-pm.html). 

John called the police and they responded promptly. John then gave the officers a piece of paper with the photo seen below; which they took with them in order to find the suspects in question. (although they did not give John an event number for this particular incident; causing John to call the next morning and retrieve an event number from a desk officer -- a desk officer who was a bit surprised John did not receive an event number -- the event number of this particular incident is: EV13-166-206).

Note: The responding officer also did not want to take surveillance evidence that John offered to them; and this is the same officer who helped Johns' neighbor Jane by getting surveillance evidence from John. > go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/05/johns-neighbor-jane.html -- QUESTION: why did the officer fail to gather surveillance footage from John for this incident; while gathering footage from John for Jane?).

One of the officers said they were going to search around the neighborhood looking for the vehicle; but John told them he had already done that and could not find the vehicle in question (notice the large dent in the left rear side panel). Johns' neighbor Jane opted to provide extra witness testimony; but the officers declined to do get that witness report from Jane. John then took it upon himself to get that testimony from Jane. 

> go to: http://likroper.com/15JUNE2013A.wmv +  http://likroper.com/15JUNE2013X.wmv

SEE ALSO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @
http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

JOHN'S NEIGHBOR JANE / CASE #13-3093

John's neighbor Jane recently had her home burglarized. Jane was hesitant to call the police, but John insisted that she do so. Jane then called the Sunnyvale police on Johns' cell phone and they quickly responded. To make a long story short; one of the officers came to Johns' house to discuss what had happened to Jane, asking about any surveillance footage that may be available from the incident so they could place the criminals at the scene of the crime.  

QUESTION: Why did officers Smith and Ochoa fail to gather surveillance footage showing the attack on John that night at the Oasis Nightclub? Why did they tell John he would be trespassing if he returned to the club; when John had recently/allegedly been attacked by karaoke host Doug? Can anyone say "ignoring exculpatory evidence?" I didn't think so...

INCLUSIVENESS VERSUS EXCLUSIVENESS

TV SHOWS LIKE SURVIVOR AND BIG BROTHER ETC (any show where "someone has to go home tonight") are really just manifestations of the vulture-like corporate mentality of the people who created the shows to begin with. And what do I mean by this? 

When John grew up; American society was in the throes of dealing with the Civil Rights movement and/or just divisive racial issues in general. And because of all the rampant discrimination that existed before John was born; John found himself in a generation that shunned discrimination by trying to be inclusive as opposed to exclusive. This was loud the message of the 1960s that John grew up with. 

So what happened to this message? Who thought inculcating division and discrimination back into our society once again was a good thing? > Leading us directly to John being attacked; then ordered to leave the Oasis Nightclub by two young, inexperienced Sunnyvale police officers (Smith and Ochoa) who look like they just graduated from High School last week; obviously missing all of the important lessons of the 1960s. What is up with that?! 

This gaping generation gap is allowing innocent people like John to be sucked into it; not unlike some kind of quantum gravitational Black Hole of ignorance in outer space...

WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT

THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA may have been slave owners and abusers of womens' rights; but they also created popular documents which still stand the test of time. It seems these government 'parents' and/or 'fathers' truly cared about their children (and/or chattel); as the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights are now known the world over for their common sense rights protections. But while the founding government fathers seemed to truly care about their childrens' rights; liberties and/or freedoms; our current government mothers and/or fathers clearly do not. They seem to have forgotten that some of the initial rights granted to United States citizens are IN/ULALIENABLE RIGHTS; meaning no living being can deny them of these rights; no judge; NOBODY...Therefore; our current United States government is quite simply; being bad parents > "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness..."  http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/

FEDS IDENTIFY 300,000 AMERICANS AS TERRORISTS?

QUESTIONS: 1) DO YOU FEEL LIKE NO ONE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO COMMIT VIOLENCE AGAINST YOU? (answer in this case: YES) 2) AND DO YOU SOMETIMES FAIL TO BLINDLY FOLLOW THE COMMANDS OF "AUTHORITES"? (answer in this case: YES) 3) DO YOU FILM ENCOUNTERS WITH POLICE? (answer in this case: YES). Then you might be part of a "domestic terrorism" movement and not even know it. The Los Angeles Times recently posted an article attempting to define a domestic terrorist movement consisting of as many as 300,000 Americans. Some are even labeled as non-violent "paper terrorists". IS THERE A MORE ORWELLIAN TERM THAN A "NON-VIOLENT TERRORIST" (answer: NO) > go to: http://www.activistpost.com/2013/04/feds-identify-300000-americans-as.html

QUESTIONS: 1) WHAT'S THE POINT OF PASSING A "VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN" ACT IF THIS KIND OF CRAP IS STILL ALLOWED TO GO ON AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL? 2) I THOUGHT WE AS A SOCIETY COLLECTIVELY ROSE ABOVE THIS KIND OF ABHORRENT SHIT 40 YEARS AGO DURING THE TURBULENT 1960S? 3) WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SURVEILLANCE CAMERA AND A HAND HELD CAMERA? 4) IF INNOCENT PEOPLE CAN HAVE THEIR GUNS TAKEN FROM THEM; THEN THOSE SAME PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE THOSE CAMERAS TO RECORD POLICE; OR ANYONE ELSE WHO MAY BRING THEM HARM. BY THE WAY; THAT WAS NOT A QUESTION; THAT WAS A FACT.

CATLYN HOLLYWOOD ASSAULTED?

One night a few years back while at the Oasis Nightclub; Johns' friend Catlyn Hollywood was assaulted out in front of the club. (this assault was allegedly witnessed by Catlyns' friends; the man supposedly grabbed Catlyns' buttocks and breasts as he pressed Catlyn up against a wall outside) Catlyn told John of the assault; and that the attacker was at The Patio bar next door to the Oasis Nightclub. John then went with Catlyn to The Patio bar next door to look for the assailant. Catlyn had also called the Sunnyvale police about the assault; but when the officers arrived; they did nothing to apprehend the subject in question who was allegedly in the Patio bar at the time..

Therefore; what happened to John at the Oasis Nightclub was clearly NOT an isolated incident (go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/04/officers-smith-and-ochoa.html) as this is a pattern negligent behavior that goes way back with the Sunnyvale police department. Catlyn can be contacted on Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/catlyn.hollywood.