JOHN'S NEIGHBOR JANE / CASE #13-3093

John's neighbor Jane recently had her home burglarized. Jane was hesitant to call the police, but John insisted that she do so. Jane then called the Sunnyvale police on Johns' cell phone and they quickly responded. To make a long story short; one of the officers came to Johns' house to discuss what had happened to Jane, asking about any surveillance footage that may be available from the incident so they could place the criminals at the scene of the crime.  

QUESTION: Why did officers Smith and Ochoa fail to gather surveillance footage showing the attack on John that night at the Oasis Nightclub? Why did they tell John he would be trespassing if he returned to the club; when John had recently/allegedly been attacked by karaoke host Doug? Can anyone say "ignoring exculpatory evidence?" I didn't think so...

INCLUSIVENESS VERSUS EXCLUSIVENESS

TV SHOWS LIKE SURVIVOR AND BIG BROTHER ETC (any show where "someone has to go home tonight") are really just manifestations of the vulture-like corporate mentality of the people who created the shows to begin with. And what do I mean by this? 

When John grew up; American society was in the throes of dealing with the Civil Rights movement and/or just divisive racial issues in general. And because of all the rampant discrimination that existed before John was born; John found himself in a generation that shunned discrimination by trying to be inclusive as opposed to exclusive. This was loud the message of the 1960s that John grew up with. 

So what happened to this message? Who thought inculcating division and discrimination back into our society once again was a good thing? > Leading us directly to John being attacked; then ordered to leave the Oasis Nightclub by two young, inexperienced Sunnyvale police officers (Smith and Ochoa) who look like they just graduated from High School last week; obviously missing all of the important lessons of the 1960s. What is up with that?! 

This gaping generation gap is allowing innocent people like John to be sucked into it; not unlike some kind of quantum gravitational Black Hole of ignorance in outer space...

WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT

THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA may have been slave owners and abusers of womens' rights; but they also created popular documents which still stand the test of time. It seems these government 'parents' and/or 'fathers' truly cared about their children (and/or chattel); as the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights are now known the world over for their common sense rights protections. But while the founding government fathers seemed to truly care about their childrens' rights; liberties and/or freedoms; our current government mothers and/or fathers clearly do not. They seem to have forgotten that some of the initial rights granted to United States citizens are IN/ULALIENABLE RIGHTS; meaning no living being can deny them of these rights; no judge; NOBODY...Therefore; our current United States government is quite simply; being bad parents > "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness..."  http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/

FEDS IDENTIFY 300,000 AMERICANS AS TERRORISTS?

QUESTIONS: 1) DO YOU FEEL LIKE NO ONE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO COMMIT VIOLENCE AGAINST YOU? (answer in this case: YES) 2) AND DO YOU SOMETIMES FAIL TO BLINDLY FOLLOW THE COMMANDS OF "AUTHORITES"? (answer in this case: YES) 3) DO YOU FILM ENCOUNTERS WITH POLICE? (answer in this case: YES). Then you might be part of a "domestic terrorism" movement and not even know it. The Los Angeles Times recently posted an article attempting to define a domestic terrorist movement consisting of as many as 300,000 Americans. Some are even labeled as non-violent "paper terrorists". IS THERE A MORE ORWELLIAN TERM THAN A "NON-VIOLENT TERRORIST" (answer: NO) > go to: http://www.activistpost.com/2013/04/feds-identify-300000-americans-as.html

QUESTIONS: 1) WHAT'S THE POINT OF PASSING A "VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN" ACT IF THIS KIND OF CRAP IS STILL ALLOWED TO GO ON AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL? 2) I THOUGHT WE AS A SOCIETY COLLECTIVELY ROSE ABOVE THIS KIND OF ABHORRENT SHIT 40 YEARS AGO DURING THE TURBULENT 1960S? 3) WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SURVEILLANCE CAMERA AND A HAND HELD CAMERA? 4) IF INNOCENT PEOPLE CAN HAVE THEIR GUNS TAKEN FROM THEM; THEN THOSE SAME PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE THOSE CAMERAS TO RECORD POLICE; OR ANYONE ELSE WHO MAY BRING THEM HARM. BY THE WAY; THAT WAS NOT A QUESTION; THAT WAS A FACT.

CATLYN HOLLYWOOD ASSAULTED?

One night a few years back while at the Oasis Nightclub; Johns' friend Catlyn Hollywood was assaulted out in front of the club. (this assault was allegedly witnessed by Catlyns' friends; the man supposedly grabbed Catlyns' buttocks and breasts as he pressed Catlyn up against a wall outside) Catlyn told John of the assault; and that the attacker was at The Patio bar next door to the Oasis Nightclub. John then went with Catlyn to The Patio bar next door to look for the assailant. Catlyn had also called the Sunnyvale police about the assault; but when the officers arrived; they did nothing to apprehend the subject in question who was allegedly in the Patio bar at the time..

Therefore; what happened to John at the Oasis Nightclub was clearly NOT an isolated incident (go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/04/officers-smith-and-ochoa.html) as this is a pattern negligent behavior that goes way back with the Sunnyvale police department. Catlyn can be contacted on Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/catlyn.hollywood.

VOTER INTIMIDATION?

NEIGHBORHOOD COPWATCHs' initial "VOTER INTIMIDATION" post (go to: http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/02/voter-intimidation.html) is even more proof that the Sunnyvale police department has been questionably focusing their energies upon John for many years now; as John is likely seen as an outspoken and effective activist worthy of active destabilization.  The Sunnyvale police have clearly "had it out" for John for quite awhile now.

With a combination of; 1) the passing of the highly unconstitutional USA Patriot Act; 2) a Republican administration (in 2007) unwilling to protect the Civil Rights of its' citizens; 3) and a new "Democratic" administration either unwilling and/or unable to bring justice to a messy post-911 situation; the Sunnyvale police clearly thought -- and apparently continue to think -- they have some sort of free reign on the destabilization and/or harassment and/or stalking etc of key dissidents. 

Go to: COINTELPRO @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

The meeting in question in this particular post was a meeting John had arranged to have moved from an inconvenient distant location the City of Sunnyvale had previously chosen; to a location closer to the homes of the people affected who wanted to speak. A Sunnyvale police officer was obviously focusing on and following John as John entered the meeting John had arranged for his neighbors. 

> The meeting was held in the Peterson middle school cafeteria -- John IN FACT attended Peterson high school back in the late 1970s and even played drums with rock bands in this same cafeteria in high school -- First at a variety show; then at a dance during his senior year.

Therefore; to have a police officer stalk John at a meeting John had arranged for his neighbors is not only a violation of Johns' historic right to freely access a campus he once attended (John recently attended the Peterson high school mega reunion); but also very similar to having law enforcement present where people vote. This is called "voter intimidation" to those who have just joined the party.

And when you couple this with the latest Sunnyvale police attempts to keep John off the Peterson campus (where John had and/or still has a need and/or a right to vote; and/or not be discriminated against in any way shape or form -- Note: The SCUSD receives federal dollars based upon a policy of NON-DISCRIMINATION); the Sunnyvale police department are showing an obvious pattern of unconstitutional behavior which needs to be corrected ASAP. 

THEREFORE; changes must be made to the Sunnyvale police department to make them a truly constitutional entity and/or in line with the United States Constitution; 

as NO ONE is above the law...

 

IN RETROSPECT; when Johns' now ex-CIA buddy told John the Sunnyvale police "have it out for him" after the Sunnyvale police surrounded Johns' house with a SWAT team and eventually fired at John for picking up litter in Johns' neighborhood; (something officer Dischler had previously thanked John for) this was apparently no joke. It appears at least part of the Sunnyvale police department has been attempting to control Johns' actions as far back as February of 2007 > go to: http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/02/voter-intimidation.html

TRIAL BY ORDEAL?

TRIAL BY ORDEAL is an ancient judicial practice by which the guilt or innocence of the accused is determined by subjecting them to an unpleasant, usually dangerous experience. Classically, the test is one of life or death and the proof of innocence is survival. In some cases, the accused is considered innocent if he escapes injury or if his injuries heal. But the problem is; we are no longer living in medieval times; this is in fact the year 2013 and we are supposed to have collectively evolved past these ancient barbaric practices. > GO TO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv