MISTER OLENAK AND/OR DANNY OLENAK

MISTER OLENAKS' HAT ON JOHN'S PROPERTY AFTER MISTER OLENAKS' VICIOUS ATTACK

Not only did Mister Olenak attack John outside John's residence one morning without arrest; and then admit to the attack not only on video with no action taken to arrest mister Olenak by the Santa Clara police department -- but also in front of Judge Louis Amadeo, Junior as well with no action taken. 

And there is another side to this story. Sometime back during the late 1970s and/or early 1980s; one of Johns' long time neighbors Bobby Martinez was once approached by Mister Olenaks' son Danny (and Dannys' shotgun); offering Bobby to come along and rob the old Victoria Station steakhouse on Homestead Road in Cupertino. Bobby declined the offer; but Danny allegedly proceeded to carry out the robbery without Bobby. And then Danny later went on an interstate liquor store robbing spree; and was eventually apprehended in Oklahoma (I believe). 

Danny was released from prison a few years later and has kept out of trouble ever since. But the problem is; Danny once bragged to John about how he and Kurt Bangart (from Doon Court) had tortured cats in horrific ways (firecrackers placed within body cavities; dropped alive from bridges onto passing trains etc etc etc -- John also witnessed Kurt and Dannys' mass torture of frogs in Kurts' backyard from the local Calabazas Creek; and this evil behavior later manifested as violence against cats; and then people). Danny also once scrawled anti-semitic messages into the fresh cement of Johns' Jewish ex-neighbors the Yellin family. And guess where it all started? Yup. The apple does not fall far from the tree. > GO TO: MISTER OLENAKS' ADMISSION OF GUILT @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/06/mister-olenaks-admission-of-guilt.html

SEE ALSO: ANIMAL CRUELTY AND HUMAN VIOLENCE 

http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/abuse_neglect/qa/cruelty_violence_connection_faq.html

QUESTION: ARE THERE ANY UNSOLVED COLD CASE MURDERS CONNECTED TO DANNY OLENAK?

JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO JUNIOR -- After the Administrative hearing with Louis Amadeo, Junior in the City of Santa Clara back in 2007; John found out that Judge Amadeo was actually hired by the City of Santa Clara to perform his services; meaning there was a MASSIVE conflict of interest where Judge Amadeo was actually hired to come up with judgements favorable to the City of Santa Clara. It should appear obvious that Mister Amadeo was not a true unbiased third party; and instead was hired by the City of Santa Clara to help avoid inevitable lawsuits from John and potentially others.

GO TO: JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO JUNIOR
http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/judge-louis-amadeo-junior.html

NOTE: PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING is usually reserved for those who are a harm to themselves or others, so why were John's various attackers not given psychological testing for their attacks? And what does this say about police violence against those they were sworn to protect and serve? > GO TO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRVG-rWpemk

"I have several cops as patients. They scare me. They really do. They often score the same on personality disorder tests as violent criminals. No shit" -- Anonymous Psychologist

THE PENTAGON PAPERS

GO TO: http://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers/ 

At the time of the release of these documents; the United States government was adamant they not be released to the general public (and for obvious reasons -- because they were embarrassing -- yet clearly within the public interest as history has shown) And! the impeachment of President Richard Nixon had as much to do with not only Mister Nixons' obvious bad deeds; but also revenge -- as an F.B.I. agent who did not get promoted then retaliated in a rather unsavory fashion. 

GO TO: http://www.ellsberg.net/

And! now we have the almost exact same situation going on; A) a federal government who has clearly NOT been doing activities that are within the public interest; B) a federal government allowing mass surveillance WAY beyond the scope of Richard Nixons' mere bugging of the Democratic party headquarters; C) a federal government allowing mass surveillance as much for the financial advantage of wealthy corporate ogilarchs -- as for any supposed National Security purposes -- and also; D) a federal government that will clearly go to ANY length to obstruct justice and/or ignore exculpatory evidence and/or suppress evidence and/or etc etc etc while locking up others for doing the exact same thing; and E) there is no E right now; but when i think of one i will tell you.

But! unfortunately...as John's official legal representative; I would tend to think as long as legitimate legal representatives like me can have their civil rights violated by being intimidated and/or coerced and/or scared into submission by a government full of control freaks bent on command and control (of taxpayer-funded nonsense and/or folly and/or chaos); as long as yet another fool can keep even more all-important files away from the scrutiny of the people of the United States; and similarly as long as these same files can be kept from the eyes of juries to bring about due process and/or justice wherever applicable...maybe...just maybe yet another important period in American history can be kept under wraps and remain unnoticed? > go to: WIKILEAKS @ https://wikileaks.org/

SEE ALSO: A MOUNTAIN RANGE OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE @

http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/01/a-mountain-range-of-exculpatory-evidence.html 

"HAMBURGER HILL" VIETNAM

  "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself" -- Martin Luther King, Jr

COINTELPRO METHODS (continued)...

HOW ANGRY WAS OFFICER PABLO LOPEZ WHEN JOHN FILED AN INITIAL CLAIM REGARDING JOHNS' FALSE ARREST? | CA PENAL CODE SECTIONS 236-237 + CFR › Title 25 › Chapter I › Subchapter B › Part 11 › Subpart D › Section 11.404 25 CFR § 11.404 False imprisonment (photo shows Officer Lopez being investigated at the Lake Terrace Apartments after Johns' false arrest) 

COINTELPRO METHODS: A) Harassment Through the Legal System: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They discriminated when they enforced tax laws and other government regulations and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters -- B) Extralegal Force and Violence: The FBI and police threatened, instigated, and themselves conducted break-ins, vandalism, assaults, and beatings. The object was to frighten dissidents and disrupt their movements. In the case of radical Black and Puerto Rican activists (and later Native Americans), these attacks—including political assassinations—were so extensive, vicious, and calculated that they can accurately be termed a form of official "terrorism." 

SEE ALSO: COINTELPRO @ http://vault.fbi.gov/cointel-pro + http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO + THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

QUESTIONS: A MOVIE CALLED "LAKEVIEW TERRACE" THEN DEBUTED AROUND THE SAME TIME ALL OF THIS WAS HAPPENING. HOW MUCH DID THE N.S.A. KNOW ABOUT JOHNS' SITUATION AT THE TIME? IF THE INFORMATION IN QUESTION WAS AND/OR IS TOO SENSITIVE TO LITIGATE IN PUBLIC; WHY WAS AND/OR IS THIS SAME INFORMATION NOT TOO SENSITIVE TO LITIGATE IN A PUBLIC MOVIE THEATER? > http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/lakeviewterrace/ 

It seems as though all of those elitist ogilarchs down in Hollywood who have access to the NSA surveillance feed (and/or all of our personal information) think they can use it mainly for profit rather than to bring justice; as most surveillance does. Since when is surveillance being allowed to be used for personal profit; while celebrating the downfall of innocent lives?

THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT - THE FBI PUBLIC CORRUPTION HOTLINE - THE NIGHT SUPERVISOR AND THE GANG OF PUNKS @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/08/santa-clara-police-department-fbi.html

The link seen above was a major turning point in John's multi-year investigation into who was behind the night time disturbances and attacks at his residence. After John called Sunnyvale D.P.S. about his bullet-riddled windshield; John then noticed a Santa Clara police vehicle travelling OUT OF IT'S JURISDICTION; and swerving down Thunderbird Avenue in an unusual fashion (as if the officer was inebriated); which then turned into Doon Court where the Rebholtz family lives.  

This unknown 'bad excuse for a cop' then exited Doon Court and escorted a gang of teenagers coming from the Rebholtz residence out of Doon Court and onto Bluebird Avenue; where they went to the Paolinetti residence thereafter. 

And not only did this crooked Santa Clara cop fail to question these obvious persons of interest; but he also had the gall to protect them and prohibit John from taking any photos of them to place them near the scene of the crime. Adding to this; this same officer then threatened John for (legally) pointing a camera at him; calling John a "troublemaker". The biggest regret John has is failing to video record his interaction with this particular crooked Santa Clara cop; who was desperately trying to intimidate John. At this point in time; it was clear to John that there was some kind of conspiracy involved between certain members of the Santa Clara Police Department; and the people involved in harassing and stalking John. Was somebody angry that John had filed a claim against the Santa Clara Police Department? Somebody like Officer Pablo Lopez and/or his cop buddy Don Paolinetti?

John also called Sunnyvale D.P.S. about the broken windshield; who then responded and talked to John's neighbor Albert Martinez in John's driveway. These officers did not take any photos of the vandalism in question to gather evidence of the crime; and these same officers also allegedly told Albert that this incident was also John's fault; blaming the vandalism on content in Johns' web site.

Around this time; another vehicle passed by Johns' residence and threw something out of the window onto the street. Responding to this; Albert's son in law (the son of a Sunnyvale D.P.S. officer) then followed the suspects back to their house and questioned them (since Sunnyvale police refused to further investigate the incident). John then contacted the F.B.I. Public Corruption Hotline and told them of this questionable incident; and John also called the night Supervisor of the apparently drunk Santa Clara officer in question; reporting the incident at this time. No action was taken by the F.B.I. to investigate this situation or prevent further disturbances. (42 U.S. Code § 1986 | Action for neglect to prevent) > SEE ALSO: TERRORIST SEAGRAVE @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2008/07/terrorist-seagrave-x-13.html

CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT?

Cruel and unusual punishment is a phrase describing punishment that is considered to be unacceptable due to the suffering, pain, or humiliation it inflicts on the person subjected to it. And while the definition of the words "cruel" and "unusual" are obviously relative (meaning something different to each person who interprets them) for some odd reason there is great debate as to whether the death penalty is cruel and unusual (when it obviously is). 

The letter of the law versus the spirit of the law is an idiomatic antithesis. When one obeys the letter of the law but not the spirit, one is obeying the literal interpretation of the words (the "letter") of the law, but not the intent of those who wrote the law. And it should be obvious to most emotionally intelligent people that the 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution was meant to be broadly interpreted and/or applied to a variety of situations other than just capital punishment. 

For instance; countless incarcerated males in the United States experience Cruel and Unusual Punishment on a daily basis -- everything from prison rape to beatings -- while women's prisons are cushy in comparison. This is not only a form of government-sanctioned institutionalized gender discrimination; but also essentially in violation of the United Nations Convention Against Torture -- as well as the Eight Amendment to the United States Constitution. Then when you add in the often unnecessary and violent "Use of Force" by law enforcement; it gets uglier by the minute. 

Scientific studies have shown huge differences in brain structure between individuals, and some individuals actually have no ability to feel empathy (see: Narcissistic-Personality Disorder + http://www.livescience.com/37684-narcissistic-personality-disorder-brain-structure.html); and some of these decidedly and/or genetically non-empathetic people with Narcissistic Personality Disorder are in positions of power (Judges, Lawmakers, Police etc). 

"Narcissistic Personality Disorder is characterized by a long-standing pattern of grandiosity (either in fantasy or actual behavior), an overwhelming need for admiration, and usually a complete lack of empathy toward others. People with this disorder often believe they are of primary importance in everybody’s life or to anyone they meet. While this pattern of behavior may be appropriate for a king in 16th Century England, it is generally considered inappropriate for most ordinary people today..."

For instance; not to be divisive but...almost the entire Republican political party (and/or G.O.P.) is known for it's "lawful" lack of empathy towards pretty much all life on earth (except for humans still within their mothers' wombs that is; humans who need protection in order to create a new generation of young soldiers and/or corporate workers etc); and/or the need to go off to war every Republican era in order to suspend the Constitutional rights of the American public, which is clearly a form of Cruel and Unusual Punishment within itself. And why is this? 

Because what inevitably ensues after this annual Republican Constitutional suspension; is law enforcement treating individuals LIKE TOTAL SHIT (individuals who they took an oath to protect and serve). Law enforcement is allowed to treat people the way dogs should not even be treated during these vile and/or evil Republican eras...and this -- my good people -- is one of the truest definitions of "Cruel and Unusual Punishment".

OTHER OBVIOUS EXAMPLES OF CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT: 1) Arresting people who feed the homeless in Florida; 2) Arresting people who feed ducks in California and injuring them in the process; 3) Arresting people who are peacefully protesting and/or violently attacking peaceful protesters and/or pepper spraying peaceful protesters; 4) Law enforcement asking someone to leave a bar for "trespassing" (isolating the person from their friends) after that person got attacked and the police refused to pull up the surveillance footage; 5) The unrestrained usage of billy clubs and/or guns by law enforcement; 6) Unlawful double jeopardy and/or GPS legs clamps; 7) Solitary confinement; 8) Prison guards who knew Jim Finley was being raped at Elmwood Correctional Facility yet did nothing to stop it (women more often than not DO NOT allow each other to have dignity or self-esteem; while men definitely do -- therefore; allowing men to be raped in prison is FAR MORE psychologically damaging than it is to women -- THE FACT IS; NO ONE DESERVES THIS KIND OF TREATMENT); 9) Allowing Jake Paolinetti and friends to stalk and harass and menace John for almost a decade (then blaming John for what they did); 10) Unlawful orders by law enforcement which violate in/unalienable Constitutional rights; 11) Usage of military drones; 12) War in general (which mainly affects the innocent); 13) Crucifixion etc etc etc...

Humans are mammals; and mammals share traits with all other similar mammalian creatures -- including the fight or flight response; foraging for food (and/or gainful employment); and/or other violent primitive instincts driven by their ancient lower "reptilian brains". As a response to these often violent and/or selfish human/animal tendencies; laws have been created to urge humans out of their relatively uncivilized state of being. 

Everything from the Code of Hammurabi in ancient Babylonia; to the Ten Commandments of the Judeo-Christian-Islamic bible (note: 36 laws from the roughly 9,000 to 100,000 year old "Atlantean" society were recently found at the Nag Hammadi Library in Egypt; 10 of which are now the Ten Commandments); to the Magna Carta issued by King John of England; to the United States Constitution (which took about 14 years to ratify DUE TO CIVIL LIBERTIES CONCERNS); to the United Nations Convention Against Torture; to civil rights laws righteously passed in the 1960s -- all of these actions were intended to lift humans out of their lower mammalian state and civilize them. (And the Eight Amendment does not seem to contain any particular reference to humans as being the only ones protected from cruel and unusual punishment; meaning future interpretations could very well go in the favor of other animals as well; animals who are more often than not "punished" cruelly and unusually for committing no crime).

It is obvious the 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution needs to be more broadly interpreted to serve the common good of all people.

GO TO: U.S. Constitution › Eighth Amendment › Cruel and Unusual Punishment @ http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-meaning-cruel-unusual-punishment.html + http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruel_and_unusual_punishment + http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/spirit-of-the-law/ + http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_and_spirit_of_the_law

CIVIL RIGHTS: AN OVERVIEW

A civil right is an enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury. Examples of civil rights are freedom of speech, press, and assembly; the right to vote; freedom from involuntary servitude; and the right to equality in public places. Discrimination occurs when the civil rights of an individual are denied or interfered with because of their membership in a particular group or class. Various jurisdictions have enacted statutes to prevent discrimination based on a person's race, sex, religion, age, previous condition of servitude, physical limitation, national origin, and in some instances sexual orientation.

The most important expansions of civil rights in the United States occurred as a result of the enactment of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery throughout the United States. See U.S. Const. amend. XIII. In response to the Thirteenth Amendment, various states enacted "black codes" that were intended to limit the civil rights of the newly free slaves. 

In 1868 the Fourteenth Amendment countered these "black codes" by stating that no state "shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United States... [or] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, [or] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." See U.S. Const. amend. XIV. Section Five of the Fourteenth Amendment gave Congress the power by section five of the Fourteenth Amendment to pass any laws needed to enforce the Amendment.

During the reconstruction era that followed, Congress enacted numerous civil rights statutes. Many of these are still in force today and protect individuals from discrimination and from the deprivation of their civil rights. Section 1981 of Title 42 (Equal Rights Under the Law) protects individuals from discrimination based on race in making and enforcing contracts, participating in lawsuits, and giving evidence. See 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Other statutes, derived from acts of the reconstruction era, that protect against discrimination include: 

Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights (See 42 U.S.C. § 1983); Conspiracies to Interfere With Civil Rights (See 42 U.S.C. § 1985); Conspiracy Against Rights of Citizens (See 18 U.S.C. § 241); Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, (See 18 U.S.C. § 242); The Jurisdictional Statue for Civil Rights Cases (See 28 U.S.C. § 1443); and Peonage Abolished (See 42 U.S.C. § 1994).

NOTE: In addition to federal guarantees, state constitutions, statutes and municipal ordinances provide further protection of civil rights. See, e.g., New York's Civil Rights Law.

READ MORE @ http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/civil_rights

SEE ALSO: CALIFORNIA CIVIL RIGHTS LAW

http://oag.ca.gov/civil + http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/civilrights/01cr_handbook.pdf?

Note: Civil rights statutes apply to all races and/or classes. The financially prohibitive nature of the justice system in the United States has created a "class-based financial discrimination" which in effect disallows participation by those who cannot afford decent legal representation; therefore violating the civil rights of countless low income individuals in the process.

A MOUNTAIN RANGE OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE

The links below are a good example of how a literal mountain range of exculpatory evidence can be available for judicial review; yet still be largely ignored by the American injustice system due to rampant insufficiency. > FAHRENHEIT 911 FULL MOVIE IN HD ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/12/fahrenheit-911-full-movie-in-hd.html + INSIDE THE SAUDI/911 COVERUP @ http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/inside-the-saudi-911-coverup/ + VARIOUS QUESTIONABLE COVER UPS BY THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE AND/OR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AND/OR THE SUNNYVALE AND/OR SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENTS ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/07/various-criminal-andor-illegal-cover.html + STAYING ON POINT: A PATTERN OF NEGLIGENCE AND/OR CORRUPTION OVER TIME (continued) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/06/pattern-of-negligent-behavior-over-time.html + THE ADDENDUM BLOG @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/

"INJUSTICE ANYWHERE IS A THREAT TO JUSTICE EVERYWHERE." 

-- MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR

LRE RESEARCH

Further proof of John's obvious mental health and/or extreme intelligence is contained within John's independent scientific research. John could have graduated early from High School; but chose instead to drop out of school to play the drums. Years later after the death of his brother Carl; John got interested in science once again and started researching various subjects.  

Extremely intelligent (and/or especially extremely emotionally intelligent) people like John are often seen by relative simpletons as being freaks and/or "mentally ill" due to their incredible intelligence and/or sheer volume of thought; expression and compassion.  

And especially when it comes to emotional intelligence; where it almost seems like John was born with all of the available emotional intelligence in the universe -- while many others somehow got NONE WHATSOEVER.  (George Hills Incorporated; Judge Louis Amadeo Junior; federal X-officer Gabrielle Seagrave and/or Santa Clara officer Pablo Lopez etc etc etc). 

John was even praised for his absolutely brilliant independent scientific research by an alleged C.I.A. agent who added to Johns' research base with even more important information previously unknown to John. So please! Stop the character assassination and get with the program already! High school is over now kiddies; so let's stop the bullying! Bullying starts at the federal government level; then slowly trickles down to everyone else.

 

These are the LRE RESEARCH links: http://lreresearch.blogspot.com/ + 
go to: http://likroper.com > click on the LRE RESEARCH button...