JOHN'S NEIGHBOR JANE / CASE #13-3093

John's neighbor Jane recently had her home burglarized. Jane was hesitant to call the police, but John insisted that she do so. Jane then called the Sunnyvale police on Johns' cell phone and they quickly responded. To make a long story short; one of the officers came to Johns' house to discuss what had happened to Jane, asking about any surveillance footage that may be available from the incident so they could place the criminals at the scene of the crime.  

QUESTION: Why did officers Smith and Ochoa fail to gather surveillance footage showing the attack on John that night at the Oasis Nightclub? Why did they tell John he would be trespassing if he returned to the club; when John had recently/allegedly been attacked by karaoke host Doug? Can anyone say "ignoring exculpatory evidence?" I didn't think so...

INCLUSIVENESS VERSUS EXCLUSIVENESS

TV SHOWS LIKE SURVIVOR AND BIG BROTHER ETC (any show where "someone has to go home tonight") are really just manifestations of the vulture-like corporate mentality of the people who created the shows to begin with. And what do I mean by this? 

When John grew up; American society was in the throes of dealing with the Civil Rights movement and/or just divisive racial issues in general. And because of all the rampant discrimination that existed before John was born; John found himself in a generation that shunned discrimination by trying to be inclusive as opposed to exclusive. This was loud the message of the 1960s that John grew up with. 

So what happened to this message? Who thought inculcating division and discrimination back into our society once again was a good thing? > Leading us directly to John being attacked; then ordered to leave the Oasis Nightclub by two young, inexperienced Sunnyvale police officers (Smith and Ochoa) who look like they just graduated from High School last week; obviously missing all of the important lessons of the 1960s. What is up with that?! 

This gaping generation gap is allowing innocent people like John to be sucked into it; not unlike some kind of quantum gravitational Black Hole of ignorance in outer space...

WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT

THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA may have been slave owners and abusers of womens' rights; but they also created popular documents which still stand the test of time. It seems these government 'parents' and/or 'fathers' truly cared about their children (and/or chattel); as the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights are now known the world over for their common sense rights protections. But while the founding government fathers seemed to truly care about their childrens' rights; liberties and/or freedoms; our current government mothers and/or fathers clearly do not. They seem to have forgotten that some of the initial rights granted to United States citizens are IN/ULALIENABLE RIGHTS; meaning no living being can deny them of these rights; no judge; NOBODY...Therefore; our current United States government is quite simply; being bad parents > "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness..."  http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/