INCIDENT ON 15 DECEMBER 2013 -- EV 133490020

On 15 December 2013 at around 2 am (the surveillance footage is roughly one hour ahead due to the recent time change) John called the Sunnyvale 911 emergency phone line after hearing his doorbell ring; then hung it up to call the non-emergency line instead. The 911 operator called John back; so John then stepped outside as he talked to a 911 operator. But as John got down the street the wireless signal to his land line phone weakened and cut off in the middle of the conversation. John then called back and asked for assistance again; and this time the second operator told John that an officer would eventually arrive; but the officer never arrived. John then downloaded the relatively short surveillance segment showing the incident. The video of the incident in question can be viewed @ http://likroper.com/15DEC2013_25512AM.wmv 

> SEE ALSO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x36zGEZguo

NOTE: John eventually called back the Sunnyvale police non-emergency line after 5 am and got an incident event number from a very courteous phone clerk. (EV 133490020). This seemingly innocuous incident is just a continuation of a multi-year harassment campaign that has been directed at John by members of the Rebholtz family as well as several of their friends (a party was going on at the time at the Rebholtz residence located at 1147 Doon Court in Sunnyvale. It is not known whether Mr. and Mrs. Rebholtz were home at the time of the incident). Adding to this; the Sunnyvale police department continues to be negligent and in dereliction of duty (as usual) when it comes to finally ending this illegal targeted stalking and harassment of John.

THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA + 1333 LAWRENCE EXPRESSWAY + THE MARINA PLAYA APARTMENTS ETC = LAX ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ETC

DOUBLE CRESTED CORMORANT @ MARINA PLAYA APARTMENTS IN SANTA CLARA -- 24 APRIL 2009 (SEE PHOTO ABOVE) > go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-crested_Cormorant > THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA CLAIMED THIS ILLEGALLY DISPLACED DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANT WAS A COMMON HERON AT A CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON OCTOBER 8TH 1999; AND ALSO LIED ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE 1333 POND WHICH USED TO BE THE OLD CALABAZAS CREEK -- AS ONE PARTICULARLY LARGE STORM DURING THE 1950S CAUSED THE OLD CREEK TO BE RE-ROUTED. THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA CLAIMED THE POND WAS ARTIFICIAL WHEN THEY CLEARLY KNEW IT WAS NOT. ANONYMOUS CITY WORKERS LATER TOLD JOHN THEY AND OTHERS WHO WORKED FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA KNEW THE POND AT 1333 LAWRENCE EXPRESSWAY WAS A NATURAL POND.

DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS @ MARINA PLAYA APARTMENTS -- 29 JANUARY 2013

A construction worker who worked on the initial 1333 Lawrence Expressway development told John one day that he in fact overheard talk about how the initial buildings constructed at 1333 Lawrence Expressway were just "show for investors" (SEE PHOTO A below -- this is the first incarnation of the illegally developed 1333 Lawrence Expressway. These buildings and this parking lot were later razed and replaced with high density housing) And this same construction worker also told John that he was actually a bird watcher who used to watch the endangered bird at the old 1333 Lawrence Expressway pond!?! (The construction worker said the bird was an endangered "Blue Herring"; not a Double-Crested Cormorant) Leading us directly to: the City of Santa Clara has been breaking the law and lying to the public at large for many years now. NOTE: An ancient one hundred foot plus tall tree with a roughly 20 foot wide trunk was also removed from the 1333 Lawrence Expressway property sometime during the year 2000.

For instance; at one particular Santa Clara City Council meeting during the 1990s; John brought to the attention of the public the corporate and/or government-sanctioned destruction of some of the last remaining wildlife habitat surrounding Mission College in Santa Clara (Burrowing Owls; Ground Squirrels; Jack Rabbits etc -- John used to deliver BAM Magazine to Mission College and noticed the shored-up wildlife habitat around the school. John then called the office of the President of Mission College and inquired about the habitat; and apparently someone from the college had previously brought attention to the habitat; causing it to receive greater protection -- SEE PHOTO B below). 

John later heard his appearance at that particular Santa Clara City Council meeting made it on the local TV news; and someone got fined $$$ for this irresponsible environmental destruction. The Santa Clara City Council also later destroyed all evidence of City Council meetings attended by John and many others as well!?!

THEREFORE; if anyone is seeking a motive as to why John has been allowed to be treated so badly; and/or why John has had his civil rights so egregiously violated in the last few years by members of the Santa Clara police department and others closely connected to them; it likely all stems back to these initial events during the 1990s -- as there is a very close connection between the way animals are treated; and the way humans are treated.

"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated." - Mahatma Gandhi

PHOTO A

PHOTO B

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (CONTINUED)?

Below is the last post John added to his likroper.com web site right before the wrongful arrest by Pablo Lopez etc back in 2006; a wrongful arrest that occurred in the very same crosswalk John had just written about in his web site @ http://likroper.com/superbirdlandarchive3.html. This strongly suggests that perhaps Pablo Lopez (etc) may have actually been acting to help distract from and/or cover up the fact that a jogger had just gotten hit in Johns' neighborhood on 10 June 2006.

> 14 jun 2006 / WHAT CROSSWALK SIGN? - i have been told by 3 separate city of santa clara street workers that they would soon install a state law crosswalk sign on dunford way @ thunderbird avenue, but so far it has not happened - this crosswalk is close enough to a school zone to need extra signage, so please tell the city of santa clara to install a new crosswalk sign @ Council@ci.santa-clara.ca.us - thanks! 

> 14 jun 2006 - THIS JUST IN: a neighborhood jogger got hit by a reckless driver on dunford way @ teal drive on june 10th, 2006 at around 6 am in the morning, and the driver probably got let off the hook for not being drunk or something stupid like that...gee, shouldn't sober people be held even more responsible than drunk people? - oh! and what was a sunnyvale police car doing sitting in the raynor parking lot the morning after the accident?...i have been going on about the traffic and speeding situation here in SUPERBIRDLAND! for quite awhile, and i am willing to show up in court to testify if this jogger person who got hit so desires - can anyone say BIG-ASS LAWSUIT?...

TRAFFIC SCHOOL IS BORING! - PLEASE DRIVE THE POSTED SPEED LIMITS and DO NOT LITTER! $1000 FINE - ZERO TOLERANCE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH: TO REPORT LITTER AND/OR TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS IN SUNNYVALE CALL (408) 730-7100 & FOR SANTA CLARA RESIDENTS GO TO: http://www.scpd.org/ or send an email to police@ci.santa-clara.ca.us - thanks!

SEE ALSO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-obama-administration-in-2008.html

THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IN 2008

PABLO LOPEZ BEING INVESTIGATED FOR JOHNS' 

WRONGFUL ARREST AND/OR KIDNAPPING 14 JUNE 2006

The day after President Obama won the presidency back in November of 2008; John went directly to the Santa Clara police department to get records of the wrongful arrest by Santa Clara police officer Pablo Lopez and one other plain clothed cop. John assumed since Mister Obama ran on a political platform resting upon the shoulders of Martin Luther King (and/or MLK); the Obama administration would act quickly and forcefully to root out the corruption John had been experiencing for many years even back in 2008 (go to:  http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2009/07/timeline-civil-rights-wronged-andor.html) But here it is about roughly 6 years later; and no action has been taken by the federal government to correct this situation. 

In fact; it seems the Obama administration is actually not only supporting this kind of bad police behavior; but they are also expanding and legitimizing this kind of barbaric activity that has more to do with the ancient Roman empire than the United States of America.

GO TO: REVEALED: HOW THE FBI COORDINATED THE CRACKDOWN ON OCCUPY @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/revealed-how-fbi-coordinated-crackdown.html+ DOES THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT HAVE A DOUBLE STANDARD ON HATE CRIMES? @ http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/crime/does-justice-department-have-double-standard-hate-crimes + A PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR; NO DISCRIMINATION WHEN IT COMES TO DISCRIMINATION @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/pattern-of-behavior.html)

Injuries caused by Johns' wrongful 2006 arrest...

SEE ALSO: MISTER OLENAKS' ADMISSION OF GUILT @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/06/mister-olenaks-admission-of-guilt.html > NOTE: THE ATTACK BY MISTER OLENAK ACTUALLY HAPPENED A FEW MONTHS BEFORE THE WRONGFUL ARREST OF JOHN ON 14 JUNE 2006 BY PABLO LOPEZ ETC. (ALL CHARGES AGAINST JOHN WERE ULTIMATELY DROPPED). INSTEAD OF ARRESTING MISTER OLENAK FOR VICIOUSLY ASSAULTING JOHN (IN CLEAR DERELICTION OF DUTY) PABLO LOPEZ AND GABBY SEAGRAVE BOTH (SEE: CONSPIRACY) MISCHARACTERIZED EVENTS AND OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE (ETC) BY FOCUSING INSTEAD ON JOHNS' FEEDING OF DUCKS -- DUCK FEEDING WHICH EX-SANTA CLARA MAYOR JUDY NADLER GAVE JOHN PERMISSION TO DO AT A CITY COUNCIL MEETING?! APPARENTLY; GABBY SEAGRAVE KNEW OF MISTER OLENAKS' EARLY MORNING ATTACK; QUIETLY SHOWING UP OUT OF THE BLUE TO OVERSEE THE ABUSIVE TREATMENT JOHN WAS RECEIVING AT THE HANDS OF THE SUNNYVALE POLICE AFTER THE ATTACK BY MISTER OLENAK. (GABBY SEAGRAVE IS/AND OR WAS A FEDERAL X-OFFICER WORKING PARTIALLY FOR THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION TO SUPPRESS THE ACTIVITIES OF ACTIVISTS ETC UNDER THE HIGHLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL USA PATRIOT ACT. GABBY SEAGRAVE WAS THEN PROMOTED TO WORK IN INTERNAL AFFAIRS AFTER ALL OF THIS OCCURRED TO PLACE "THE FOX IN CONTROL OF THE HEN HOUSE" SO TO SPEAK -- LIKELY TO HELP WARD OFF JOHNS' EVENTUAL QUESTIONING OF THESE EVENTS. PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS WERE IN FULL EFFECT AT THE TIME [GO TO: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_Operations_(United_States)] AS THE ATTACK BY MISTER OLENAK WAS AGGRESSIVELY COVERED-UP BY THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT AT A "SHAM ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING" IN 2007) > http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/10/are-you-being-delphied.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/judge-louis-amadeo-junior.htm

"I have several cops as patients. They scare me. They really do. They often score the same on personality disorder tests as violent criminals. No shit" -- Anonymous Psychologist

PRIOR KNOWLEDGE: THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

see also: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/gang-stalking.html

This document shows prior knowledge on the part of the State of California regarding the harassment and stalking John was experiencing as far back as the year 2011. NOTE: NO ACTION was taken by the State of California to abate the abuse that was occurring to John. In fact; the State of California totally ignored Johns' plea for help and continued to send form letters to his place of residence.

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF EVENTS AND/OR ILLEGALLY SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE BY THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT IN JUNE 2010 AND/OR THE SUNNYVALE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN JUNE 2011

SEE ALSO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/gang-stalking.html

THE ABOVE FLIER WAS FIRST DISTRIBUTED BY JOHN WITHIN HIS NEIGHBORHOOD IN JUNE 2010; THEN LATER SUBMITTED BY THE REBHOLTZ FAMILY AND PLACED FILE AT THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT (see police stamp on document: T11CH 003694); PROVING THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT HAD PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF JOHNS' SITUATION UP TO ONE YEAR BEFORE THE JUNE 2011 EVENT > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHoPZYXSmXU

Since John is one of the main activists in his neighborhood; John distributed flyers like the one seen above all over his neighborhood trying to bring an end to the illegal siege he was experiencing at his residence. After experiencing many years of harassment and stalking by the sons (and friends) of Santa Clara Police officer Don Paolinetti; John quickly drafted the above document to distribute around his neighborhood after one particularly sloppy night time attack (around 10 pm) by Jake Paolinetti and the older of the two Rebholtzs' sons; as well as at least one other person who was driving the large white SUV/truck type vehicle used in this particular incident. (This event was also witnessed by John ex-neighbor Steve Henson and his son).

The Santa Clara police department not only took no action to bring an end to the illegal activity; but they also retaliated against John by attempted to criminalize John for bringing this situation to the publics' attention. This proves the Santa Clara police department -- as well as the Rebholtz family -- was complicit in covering up this situation roughly one year before it got out of hand in June of 2011.

NOTE: Jake Paolinetti is clearly NOT entitled to the qualified immunity available to government officials; as the legal principle to bar Jakes' illegal and threatening conduct is clearly pre-established. Also; no court has ever recognized a First Amendment right for ANY citizen to be free from retaliatory non-arrest with probable cause; nor was such a right otherwise clearly established at the time of Jakes' non-arrest. And while it has been pre-established that government officials may not be sued under the First Amendment for retaliatory prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue prosecution; the question remains whether government officials CAN be sued under the First Amendment for retaliatory non-prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue prosecution > GO TO: 25 JUN 2011: JAKE PAOLINETTI: CRIMINAL THREATS; TARGETED STALKING; HATE CRIMES; GANG ENHANCEMENTS; ETC @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdSSSANDXlE&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug&index=10&feature=plcp

QUESTIONS: Why did the Reboholtz family go out of their jurisdiction to the City of Santa Clara to to report this supposed "crime"? Why did they avoid bringing this to the attention of the Sunnyvale police department? It should be obvious the Rebholtz family used their questionable connections with Santa Clara officer Don Paolinetti to pull strings and/or distract from the FACT that Jake Paolinetti and friends were involved in a multi-year seige targeting John at his residence. Therefore; John wants to thank both the Rebholtz family; and the Paolinetti family as well for being stupid enough to include this document as part of their "evidence of harassment".

RELATED STORY: http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/11/27/san-jose-police-officer-accused-of-writing-phony-traffic-citations/

ILLEGAL USE OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY AGAINST UNARMED UNITED STATES CITIZENS?

Stock photo of a U.S. Military Helicopter...

1) Shortly before Johns' older brother Carl passed away in an unexpected vehiclular accident on December 24th, 1999: On the morning of October 24, 1999 a U.S. Army helicopter hovered closely over Johns' residence (about 30 feet up); did three mini-circles; then flew off -- John published his annual Only Good Newsletter @ http://likroper.com/onlygoodv7n3.htm that very same morning; citing widely available public information garnered from the world wide web regarding "Ebe"; one of the alleged Roswell aliens. QUESTION: Why did a U.S.Army helicopter fly so low over Johns' residence on this day back in 1999? (this event was also witnessed by Johns' old neighbor Leo; who had and/or has a classifed clearance status for his job making Tomahawk Missiles etc) > see also: http://www.theguardian.com/world/ufos

NOTE: John used this experience as inspiration to come up with one of his more classic quotes: "The rising middle fingers of true deepened democracy answer to NO ONE" which appeared in his next Only Good Newsletter.

2) Sometime during the Bush administration years (probably around 2004-2005); John went to a local 7-11 while on his way to a friends' house to find what appeared to be an individual from the U.S. military (caucasian male with red hair and freckles) wearing fatigues jumping on an adjacent car hood in the parking lot of the 7-11; while focusing on John. This incident did not scare John and nothing in particular transpired from this strange event; nonetheless it is yet another highly questionable incident that happened during the highly questionable years under the Bush Administration. This is yet another highly unusual government-sanctioned event needing a thorough explanation.

3) On May 4, 2006 John was at his friends' apartment in Palo Alto re-recording an old song; when yet another U. S. Army helicopter flew extremely close to the window of Jims' room at fathers' apartment on Towle Drive in Palo Alto; about 30 feet away (this event was witnessed by various neighbors) they peered in Jims' the window; flew off and then quickly disappeared. 

Porter Goss resigned as Director of the CIA the very next day on May 5, 2006 -- For more information regarding these questionable incidents; A Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A) inquiry must first be submitted to the U.S. State Department. QUESTION: What was the official rationale for using the U.S. Military against unarmed United States citizens?

James Patrick Finley -- circa 1980s

NOTE: This was one of the last times John saw his old buddy Jim; as Jim passed away in 2012 after being continually harassed and stalked by the Palo Alto Police Department for many years. Jim was basically tortured and/or jailed (for riding his bike without a light of all things) just weeks before his untimely death. ALSO; Jim did a short stint at Elmwood Correctional Facility in the early 2000s. When Jim was released from custody; a guard from Elmwood Correctional Facility went on a local radio station (either KSJO and/or KFUX) talking about "J-birds" (in other words; 'mentally compromised' inmates like Jim. > BY THE WAY: JIM HAD A 150+ IQ!? Jim was WAY MORE INTELLIGENT than ANY lame-ass police officer and/or prison guard!)

These are two songs John recorded with Jim and his brother Mike back during the 1980s > SOUTH OF HEAVEN BOOTLEG @ http://likroper.bandcamp.com/album/south-of-heaven-bootleg  > Guitar Player magazine Publisher Don Menn attended Jims' funeral service and spoke very highly of Jims' guitar playing abilities.

ARE YOU HEARING VOICES INSIDE YOUR HEAD? John recently met someone on Johns' "Occupy Sunnyvale" Facebook page named Scott Blokzyl (1-761-280-4180) Scott Blokzyl is aware of the abuse of a device called a "neurophone"; a device can be used to remotely torture victims with unwanted neurological interference. (THE NEUROPHONE device that uses the new hyperspatial, virtual state, nested modulation technology is Dr. Pat Flanagan's neurophone. The neurophone is a device that, contrary to all present theory and knowledge, will directly “pump the brain” and reproduce sound and information directly in the brain and mind system, without going through the auditory system at all. > go to: http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/neurophone.htm).

The neurophone has supposedly been used by corrupt law enforcement and/or organized crime for many years now; and Scott Blokzyl is supposedly now working with the FCC to get to the bottom if this situation. John suspects that Jim Finley was perhaps remotely tortured with the usage of neurophone technology; as Jim allegedly regularly heard unwanted voices inside his head. In light of this; all modern psychological theories regarding people "hearing voices" must be re-examined. 

Go to: ELECTRONIC HARASSMENT: VOICES IN MY MIND @ 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmE4oTXYmf4

NOTE: In 1973 a psychologist sent sane volunteers to mental institutions. All were diagnosed with psychiatric disorders > go to: ROSENHAN EXPERIMENT @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosenhan_experiment

DOCUMENT SUBMITTED TO SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER LISA STEINGART ON 18 OCT 2013

AS A PRECURSOR TO THE CIVIL RIGHTS LAWSUIT JOHN MUST FILE BY 14 APR 2014: After receiving a speeding ticket on Blossom Hill road in San Jose on 12 JUN 2013 for driving 14 MPH over the posted 40 MPH speed limit; John put together an explanation of the incident and gave it to Superior Court Judge Lisa Steingart on 18 OCT 2013 (Superior court of California; County of Santa Clara) To protect the innocent; the contents of this document in a semi-redacted form can be seen here @ http://likroper.com/TRAFFIC_COURT_18OCT2013x.doc

This document not only shows that John has the innate ability to represent himself better than most seasoned attorneys in the court of law (as John got a $100 reduction in his fine due to his efforts) but it also shows that John clearly has a negligence case against the City of Sunnyvale and the City of Santa Clara that goes back many years to the death of his brother Carl.

AFTER A PUBLIC MEETING AT THE OLD SANTA CLARA LIBRARY IN THE LATE 1990S; THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA'S TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROMISED TO MAKE A NUMBER OF CHANGES TO THE STREET THAT JOHN LIVES ON -- CHANGES THAT WOULD AFFECT TRAFFIC CALMING LEVELS TO KEEP UP WITH THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC FLOW -- AFTER THE MEETING; IT WAS DIFFICULT FOR JOHN TO GET THE SANTA CLARA TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT TO INSTALL EVEN ONE LOUSY CHEVRON SIGN...

REST IN PEACE, PRECIOUS...

On December 3rd, 2011; John's beloved cat Precious was found dead on the street in front of his house. The last time John saw Precious was at about 5:30 am on that very same morning; when John said: "I love you, Precious" then went to sleep. After waking up at about 10:30 am the very same day; Johns' neighbors found Precious dead in the street; and came over to tell John what happened. While the death of Precious appeared to be an accident; John suspects that it was made to LOOK like an accident when it very likely was not. 

If you click on this link: > http://likroper.com/dog1.jpg > you will see a dead dog who was apparently killed the same barbaric way as Precious during the recent Romanian dog slaughter (warning: contains graphic imagery). Do you notice blood around the dogs' body? There was absolutely NO blood at the scene of the crime where Precious was found dead; only clear fluid from her head after being smashed in the street. (no photos were taken; but several witnesses saw her body). The evidence was suspicious and suggested foul play was somehow involved.

About one month later after the death of Precious; 

John found this email from Jake Paolinetti in his email inbox:

--- On Sat, 12/10/11, Jake Paolinetti <tjpaolinetti@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Jake Paolinetti <tjpaolinetti@yahoo.com> Subject: videos To: "likroper@yahoo.com" <likroper@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, December 10, 2011, 2:18 PM 

Hi this is Jake Paolinetti, I am sorry about all the harassing and headaches I have caused you in the past and wanted to let you know I am done with it all and won't be happening anymore.  I was also wondering if you could take down the videos of me?  I would really appreciate it, because that person in those videos isn't me. Thank you, Jake  

(the videos in question can be found at: http://www.youtube.com/lrevideography)

NOTE: John believes Jake Paolinetti and friends are likely responsible for the death of Precious; but no official action was ever taken to prove and/or disprove this possibility.

 SEE ALSO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @
http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 + RETALIATION AGAINST A WHISTLE BLOWER

JOHN DID NOT VOTE ON NOVEMBER 5TH, 2013 DUE TO INTIMIDATION AND COERCION BY: 1) THE SUNNYVALE POLICE DEPARTMENT [ACTING UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW] AND/OR 2) THE SCUSD...

VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 + RETALIATION AGAINST A WHISTLE BLOWER | 8 nov 2011 -- It appears some within the Sunnyvale police department essentially retaliated against a whistle blower (John) and also violated his voting rights -- for recently coming forward with information about a pending lawsuit -- By ordering John to stay off a property where John had to vote, and all due to the fact that John made a video which the Sunnyvale police department essentially sanctioned through Officer Odle (The video is of a Peterson Middle School employee mowing the lawn > go to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bbd21_NC8_k) The information gained was CLEARLY in the public interest; regardless of the opinion of unelected judges. John therefore had his voting rights violated...

What John considers to be a form of mass-delusion is the "television-induced mentally ill paranoia" recently expressed by the Sunnyvale Police department and/or the SCUSD; largely based upon corporate-television news propaganda and/or a false-flag incident that happened roughly 3 years ago (go to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzXCvv9g9eI) Many long-term wars have been started through the usage of false-flag incidents; and the Gulf Of Tonkin incident is one of the most glaring examples of this > go to:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

Due to the questionable 1 nov 2011 incident; John was then essentially illegally prohibited from voting by the Sunnyvale police department at the Peterson Middle School; IN VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 -- (while John did eventually vote later that afternoon; but he did so under duress; something that is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE -- The verbal order to stay off the 1380 Rosalia property by the police was enough to violate John's voting rights; but having an officer on the scene that morning added another layer of illegality -- note: an old friend of John's warned John long ago that government will try to criminalize people who come forward  once a lawsuit is pending in an attempt to deflect the criticism)…

TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 20 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1971 / VOTING RIGHTS

(1) All citizens of the United States who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the people in any State, Territory, district, county, city, parish, township, school district, municipality, or other territorial subdivision, shall be entitled and allowed to vote at all such elections, without distinction of race, color, or previous condition of servitude; any constitution, law, custom, usage, or regulation of any State or Territory, or by or under its authority, to the contrary notwithstanding.

(2) No person acting under color of law shall — (A) in determining whether any individual is qualified under State law or laws to vote in any election, apply any standard, practice, or procedure different from the standards, practices, or procedures applied under such law or laws to other individuals within the same county, parish, or similar political subdivision who have been found by State officials to be qualified to vote. > source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001971----000-.html

8 nov 2011 @ 7:24 AM -- In this photo are two witnesses to the event (witnesses A and B -- see Sunnyvale police car in the background); these witnesses have seen John clean up litter in the neighborhood for many years now -- The dog on the left recently fell ill in the last six months and was put to sleep ever since dangerous pesticides were applied to the Peterson field -- The dog suddenly had a tumor appear in his nose; the same snout he used to sniff around on the field where the poison was applied…

NOTE: John had his voting rights violated by the Sunnyvale police department when he was ordered to stay off the Peterson middle school property on a day when he had to vote (see above) -- John also had just created the OCCUPY SUNNYVALE Facebook web page @ https://www.facebook.com/pages/Occupy-Sunnyvale/158329944263338?ref=hl 

QUESTION: Were the actions of the Sunnyvale police department actually just essentially paranoid over-reactions to Johns' new OCCUPY SUNNYVALE free speech web page, and was the federal government somehow involved in these illegal suppression efforts?  A Freedom Of Information Act (F.O.I.A.) form must now be filed to the appropriated government division to see if there was any federal collusion with the Sunnyvale police department behind this flagrant violation of Johns' voting rights…

QUESTIONABLE USE OF DASH CAMERAS

IN THE INCIDENTS LISTED BELOW; questionable behavior was exhibited by responding Sunnyvale police officers. In both incidents; officers instructed John to move away from the front of their squad cars; purposefully moving John out of range of their dash cameras -- QUESTION: why did both officers instruct John to move out of range of their dash cameras?

QUESTIONABLE INCIDENT #1

(SEE: CR #12-573 -- Officer Winkleman) 

GO TO:  http://likroper.com/21JAN2012A.wmv

see also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evj15rULEsU&feature=c4-overview&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug

QUESTIONABLE INCIDENT #2:

http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/06/incident-on-15-june-2013-ev13-166-206_17.html

NOTE: Purposefully evasive measures like this essentially amount to the ignoring of exculpatory evidence (by not allowing that evidence to be gathered in the first place) and/or the obstruction of justice. Adding to this; on 25 APR 2011; Jake Paolinetti was evading a Police officer when he ran to hide out in the residence of a family friend (the Henson family) across the street from Johns' house after he found out an officer was on the way. The responding officer wrongfully chose to let Jake Paolinetti go once Jake came out of hiding; leading to an even worse situation which happened a few weeks later. Therefore; this officer and/or the Sunnyvale police department are clearly negligent in this instance as well. > 25 APR 2011: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZuOygtSY6A

INSTITUTIONALIZED GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATION (continued)...

PENAL CODE

SECTION 240-248

240.  An assault is an unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another. For instance; 241.  (a) An assault is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by both the fine and imprisonment.

   

But! (b) When an assault is committed against the person of a parking control officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, and the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a parking control officer, the assault is punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by both the fine and imprisonment.

QUESTIONS: Why would the fine be more for assaulting a government employee than a tax paying citizen? This proves institutionalized government discrimination not only exists; but is also considered be to an "acceptable" part of our system of justice. If anything; those tax paying citizens (local and county taxes etc) should be protected MORE than government employees; as those tax paying citizens fund this government folly; do they not? ALL PEOPLE MUST BE PROTECTED EQUALLY TO ERADICATE ALL FORMS OF UNFAIR DISCRIMINATION IN OUR SOCIETY...

READ MORE @ http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=pen&group=00001-01000&file=240-248 + SEE ALSO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/institutionalized-gender-discrimination.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/institutionalized-gender-discrimination_25.html

NOTE: WHILE PART OF THE REASON JOHN DESPISES THE IDEA OF BEING A HOLLYWOOD STAR IS BECAUSE OF THE PRIVACY-INVADING PAPARAZZI SCENE IN HOLLYWOOD (paparazzi who essentially gather intelligence information for the NSA/CIA); The new law signed by California Governor Brown aimed at protecting celebrities and/or public figures from paparazzi harassment (including the children of police officers; perhaps due to Johns' bold, heroic actions which were ultimately aimed at bringing attention to Johns' situation) is not only; 1) another good and/or bad example of the imbalance between how the rich and poor are treated (did anyone see the movie TITANIC?); 2) but also a good and/or bad example of how some people are discriminated against in an attempt to help others; 3) as well as a good and/or bad example of how many laws are written so vaguely; at certain points within the language that they cannot be successfully/broadly applied without ensuing conflict. (It is as if these vague laws are perhaps written and passed on purpose so it can be "whatever way the wind blows" when it comes to [psychotic and/or bipartisan] judicial interpretation). The truth remains that anyone and/or everyone who is in public is a public figure; and the press is still free regardless of this new, partially unconstitutional law. > go to: http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-brown-bills-paparazzi-20130925,0,7649417.story

> AS ABOVE ~ SO BELOW? -- Other good and/or bad examples of institutionalized government discrimination: 1) members of the U.S. Congress legally involved themselves in insider trading regarding bills they are about to pass; while average citizens will be incarcerated for doing the exact same thing. This not only has made being a member of Congress more about making money than making sound decisions; BUT IT ALSO ANOTHER GLARING EXAMPLE OF INSTITUTIONALIZED GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATION. 2) If the same thing that happened to John over the last ten years happened a judge and/or a police officer; swift action would have been taken to stop the stalking and harassment long ago; as well as the "minor" attack by Doug Ward; this would have been a FELONY if the same force was used against a police officer. CAN ANYONE SAY DISCRIMINATION? I didn't think so. 3) Another example of this: (Excerpts from the S.F. Chronicle) "But there was no such clemency across the bay in Oakland at the Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse, where Commissioner Taylor Culver reigns over his courtroom with sarcastic 'humor'. During a red-light camera trial on a recent afternoon, when one defendant asked for a reduction in his fine, Culver boomed, "Nobody here is special or better than anybody. There's nobody here special but me." (can anyone see the direct contradiction within that statement? nobody is special while someone is special? ok whatever...what a stupid thing to say) This not only shows a gross arrogance (and/or sheer stupidity) on the part of some government employees; but mainly shows how discrimination has become an "acceptable" part of our society. It shows that some people we are told to look up to; are clearly not worthy of being looked up to. > http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Soaring-fines-give-ticketed-drivers-sticker-shock-4857979.php

SEE ALSO: ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/action-for-neglect-to-prevent.html

THE NSA: EXPLOITING TECHNOLOGY; WHILE MAKING PRIVACY OBSOLETE...

EXCERPTS FROM THE ARTICLE: The NSA Isn't the Only Government Agency Exploiting Technology to Make Privacy Obsolete -- For at least the last six years, government agents have been exploiting an AT&T database filled with the records of billions of American phone calls from as far back as 1987. The rationale behind this dragnet intrusion, codenamed Hemisphere, is to find suspicious links between people with "burner" phones (prepaid mobile phones easy to buy, use, and quickly dispose of), which are popular with drug dealers. The secret information gleaned from this relationship with the telecommunications giant has been used to convict Americans of various crimes, all without the defendants or the courts having any idea how the feds stumbled upon them in the first place. The program is so secret, so powerful, and so alarming that agents "are instructed to never refer to Hemisphere in any official document," according to a recently released government PowerPoint slide. -- And it's true: the smartphone in your pocket is a tracking device that also happens to allow you to make calls, read email, and tweet. Several times every minute, your mobile phone lets your cell-phone provider know where you are, producing a detail-rich history of where you have been for months, if not years, on end. GPS-enabled applications do the same. Unfortunately, there's no way to tell for sure how long the companies hang onto such location data because they won't disclose that information.

QUESTION: If this is in fact true; how could John have been stalked and harassed for nearly 10 years without at least SOMEONE knowing SOMETHING about it? I tend to think there is much more secret prior-knowledge evidence available of this episode than the United States Government wants to freely admit to: https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty-free-speech/destroying-right-be-left-alone

WITNESS INTIMIDATION AND/OR DISSUADING A WITNESS ETC: CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE § 136.1

 

The photo above shows Jake Paolinetti and two other unidentified individuals (unsuccessfully) attempting and/or conspiring to dissuade and/or intimidate John on 15 June 2013. This was roughly 4 days before John received a letter from George Hills, Incorporated inviting John to file a federal lawsuit by 12 APR 2014. The video shown above is also further proof of witness intimidation. While it is now increasingly obvious who broke Johns' windshield; no action was taken by the Sunnyvale police to find and/or question the individual and/or individuals who likely broke the windshield.

"DO YOU WANT YOUR DADDY?" --

Pablo Lopez 14 JUN 2006

The incident that occurred on Sunday July 29th, 2007 (see below) was when the witness intimidation against John officially started (a fruitless decade long effort failing to intimidate and/or scare John). But all this has done is make John angry and ready to seek swift justice. This particular incident happened about two days before John received his very first rejection letter from the City of Santa Clara for a wrongful arrest and/or detention (and/or kidnapping) by officer Pablo Lopez. John clearly had a case against the City of Santa Clara; and they knew it. Officer Lopez was investigated and reprimanded for this wrongful arrest of John (see photo above) and officer Lopez likely faced expulsion from the ranks if any decisive action was pursued in this situation; which it was not. 

Sunday, July 29, 2007 / LAYING IN WAIT, MALICIOUS VANDALISM AND ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/07/malicious-vandalism-and-attempted.html > Note: no photos of the Sunday, July 29, 2007 crime scene were taken by the responding Sunnyvale police officers; who suggested that "someone was mad" at John for something. The only person "who was mad" and/or had a clear motive against John in this case is OFFICER PABLO LOPEZ and/or THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT.

  

This incident occurred about less than one month later: Sunday, August 19, 2007 / THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT - THE FBI PUBLIC CORRUPTION HOTLINE - THE NIGHT SUPERVISOR AND THE GANG OF PUNKS @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/08/santa-clara-police-department-fbi.html

 

THE ABOVE INCIDENT IS SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE THAT MEMBERS OF THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT WERE ACTIVELY COVERING-UP FOR JAKE PAOLINETTI AND FRIENDS. IT IS JOHNS' BELIEF ROGUE MEMBERS OF THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTED THESE VARIOUS TEENAGERS TO HARASS AND STALK  JOHN IN RETALIATION FOR SPEAKING OUT ABOUT THE ABUSE JOHN EXPERIENCED AT THE HANDS OF PABLO LOPEZ -- IT'S ALL ABOUT ESTABLISHING A MOTIVE FOR THIS CRIME... 

CAL. PEN. CODE § 136.1 : California Code - Section 136.1

- See more @ http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/1/7/6/s136.1#sthash.Vkxa1jRX.dpuf 

(a)Except as provided in subdivision (c), any person who does any of the following is guilty of a public offense and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or in the state prison: 

(1)Knowingly and maliciously prevents or dissuades any witness or victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial, proceeding, or inquiry authorized by law. (2)Knowingly and maliciously attempts to prevent or dissuade any witness or victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial, proceeding, or inquiry authorized by law. (b)Except as provided in subdivision (c), every person who attempts to prevent or dissuade another person who has been the victim of a crime or who is witness to a crime from doing any of the following is guilty of a public offense and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or in the state prison:

(1)Making any report of that victimization to any peace officer or state or local law enforcement officer or probation or parole or correctional officer or prosecuting agency or to any judge. (2)Causing a complaint, indictment, information, probation or parole violation to be sought and prosecuted, and assisting in the prosecution thereof. (3)Arresting or causing or seeking the arrest of any person in connection with that victimization. (see: Lieutenant Simpson, Sunnyvale Police Officers Smith & Ochoa, Santa Clara Police Officers Lopez & Seagrave)
 

(c)Every person doing any of the acts described in subdivision (a) or (b) knowingly and maliciously under any one or more of the following circumstances, is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years under any of the following circumstances: (1)Where the act is accompanied by force or by an express or implied threat of force or violence, upon a witness or victim or any third person or the property of any victim, witness, or any third person. (2)Where the act is in furtherance of a conspiracy. (see: Jake Paolinetti and friends) (d)Every person attempting the commission of any act described in subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) is guilty of the offense attempted without regard to success or failure of the attempt. The fact that no person was injured physically, or in fact intimidated, shall be no defense against any prosecution under this section.  

JAKE PAOLINETTI: CRIMINAL THREATS; TARGETED STALKING; HATE CRIMES; GANG ENHANCEMENTS; ETC > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdSSSANDXlE&feature=c4-overview&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug 

The video seen above was the first most obvious attempt by Jake Paolinetti to dissuade John from gathering more evidence of wrongdoing. Acting as the aggressor; Jake very clearly backs up John about 20-30 feet for merely holding a video camera in the public domain where it is legal for John to do so. (John also told the 911 operator that he had legally consumed a glass of wine; and while John was legally intoxicated at the time of the call; no breath tests were conducted by the responding police officers to determine what level of intoxication; making this a "moot point" in Johns' opinion). In this You Tube video; Jake Paolinetti can be seen pushing John on the sidewalk; which is considered to be an assault in the State of California. 

MENTAL ILLNESS | HATE CRIMES | CRIMINAL THREATS | STALKING | HARASSMENT ETC @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZuOygtSY6A&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug 

About one month before the above incident occurred; John posted this You Tube video suggesting that Jake Paolinetti is and/or was mentally ill due to the bizarre behavior Jake has exhibited in the past. How did Johns' assessment of Jake Paolinetti get turned around and used against John? Can anyone say "psychological operations"?

NOTE: John dated a psychologist about a decade ago named Gabriele. One day between John and Gabrieles' various daily hetero localized transgressions etc; Gabriele decided to assess Johns' mental state (just for the fun of it). NOTE: Gabriele found John to be quite sane.

Furthermore; since Sunnyvale police officer Lieutenant Simpson is clearly not educated and/or trained as a psychologist; Lieutenant Simpson is therefore NOT qualified to make such a judgment about John.  (John believes Lieutenant Simpson saw the situation the Sunnyvale police had worked to cover up for so long was getting out of hand; therefore Lieutenant Simpson took evasive action to avoid getting his police department in trouble).

Lieutenant Simpson also suggested that John was "depressed". John was clearly not depressed at the time; as John was heading out to the Oasis Nightclub that very same night to be with his many friends that attend the club (friends that Sunnyvale police officers Smith and Ochoa have since illegally separated John from). Question: How could Lieutenant Simpson have come to such a conclusion unless there perhaps had not been misinterpreted surveillance monitoring of John being done at the time; surveillance that may have invaded Johns' privacy?

<><><>

SEE ALSO: OASIS NIGHTCLUB BARTENDER ANGIE: John called the Sunnyvale police from his cell phone on 20 april 2012 between 8 and 9 pm PDT. Oasis Nightclub bartender Angie can be heard dissuading John on this recorded call from Johns' cell phone. The female officer who took the call also clearly heard Oasis Nighclub bartender Angie dissuading a witness by telling John to leave the Oasis Nightclub in retaliation for John calling the Sunnyvale police; and this same officer even commented upon it during the call. Question: Why was no action taken regarding this event?

SEE ALSO: 18 USC § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
@ http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/1/7/6/s136.1