GOVERNMENT-SANCTIONED DISCRIMINATION (continued)...

IT TAKES AN IMMENSE AMOUNT OF PATIENCE TO DEAL WITH OUTSPOKEN DISSIDENTS

ONE OF THE MOST INSIDIOUS FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION HERE IN AMERICA (other than the obvious discrepancy between the treatment of human and animal) is the way government employees are treated better than "average" citizens (who supply their fat government paychecks). 

For instance; when SEVERAL PEOPLE attacked me over a multi-year period (GO TO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRVG-rWpemk&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug -- see: CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT) NO ARRESTS WERE MADE other than me (almost) for being such an outspoken activist/troublemaker speaking out against an unfair governmental system (see: Martin Luther King etc etc etc). 

But! when this EXACT SAME THING happens to (for instance) a police officer or any other government employee (or a woman or a child); IT IS A FELONY PUNISHABLE BY PRISON TIME. And this shows how Civil Rights enforcement has been selectively watered down and/or eroded by and/or for government since the onset of MLK and his genius observations; leaving a gaping hole of discrimination within American law (see: EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW).

What is the rationale behind this ideology? There is no real good reason for any of this; because if "average" citizens were treated the exact same way as government employees like they clearly should be (as if their "average" citizen lives mattered in the same way as government employees) CRIME RATES WOULD LIKELY DECREASE EXPONENTIALLY leaving no more dirty work for law enforcement; leading to eventual layoffs etc. And mainly; since this new ideology might actually pose a problem for police wanting to rough people up during police encounters; it does not happen. 

THE TRUTH IS; much of the reason government allows "average" citizens to be violated the way they do is at least partially based in arrogance on the part of condescending government employees who view their lives with a sort of "delusional narcissism" (judges etc); folks who actually think their lives are more important than others. But the other part is this:THE FACT that government feels it needs to violate our Civil Rights in order to do their job; which could not be farther from the truth...

SEE ALSO: EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/equal-justice-under-law.html + EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW? Pt II @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/reverse-discrimination.html + INSTITUTIONALIZED GENDER DISCRIMINATION @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/institutionalized-gender-discrimination.html + INSTITUTIONALIZED GENDER DISCRIMINATION Pt. II @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/institutionalized-gender-discrimination_25.html + INSTITUTIONALIZED GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATION (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/institutionalized-government.html + INSTITUTIONALIZED REVERSE RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/02/1-black-singer-attacked-in-east-bay.html + TRIAL BY ORDEAL? @  http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/trial-by-ordeal.html + DOES THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT HAVE A DOUBLE STANDARD ON HATE CRIMES? @ http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/crime/does-justice-department-have-double-standard-hate-crimes

22 JUN 2014 -- "DISCRIMINATION HAS NO PLACE IN ARIZONA, OR ANYWHERE ELSE"? -- I was talking to one of my lesbian friends last night at the bar...and I explained to her how as a heterosexual I got kicked out of a bar after being attacked by one of the bar employees...then i told her how the sunnyvale police later refused to pull up the damning surveillance footage to prove my claims and instead asked me to leave the bar as well. My lesbian friend responded saying that she worked as a karaoke host for many years and (in California) if a bar decides to refuse service to somebody they have the right to do it...and she almost seemed happy about this; like it was the right thing to do and good to have a law such as this. But I countered saying there was recently a big argument coming out of Arizona about how homosexuals could potentially be denied service based upon businesses asserting their "religious beliefs" -- So what's the difference between Arizona and California in this case? California business interests are apparently very powerful and influential within the state; and I suppose that while California supposedly has some of the most progressive anti-discrimination laws in the country; the media is so highly controlled and/or so blind and/or so whatever they are; that this gaping loophole in California anti-discrimination law has never been fully addressed; until now that is...> http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/26/politics/arizona-brewer-bill/

"To disagree with three-fourths of England on all points is one of the first elements of vanity, which is a deep source of consolation in all moments of spiritual doubt." -- Oscar Wilde

CORRUPT COPS PLANT DRUGS

Corrupt cops on the Santa Clara police force planted drugs in the home of Allison Ross, after they ransacked her home and found nothing. To make their transgression worse, they had no search warrant and Ms Ross denied them the right to search.

The incident began at a neighbor’s house where Ms Ross’ husband was arrested on unspecified charges. They then made their way to the Ross house, where they tore the house apart looking for methamphetamine. The search turned up no drugs and the cops went outside to discuss the situation. It was there they decided to plant two bags of the drugs in the house. The plan might have worked, had they not made them in front of the dash cam. It recorded their entire conversation.

They arrested Ms Ross for being under the influence of methamphetamine, but the D.A. tossed the charges because it was discovered that the cops had lied about the arrest. The question is, if they know the cops lied, why didn’t any of them face charges? Ms Ross is now suing along with her husband for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, negligent hiring and conspiracy.

Radley Balco of the Washington Post observed:

"The suit also brings up two other questions: If the district attorney’s office dismissed the charges due to false statements, why haven’t the people who made those false statements been prosecuted for perjury? And why are these particular police officers still on the job?"

Has anyone besides me noticed the fact that all of the bad cops seem to be in liberal cities and states? Provocative, is it not? > http://buzzpo.com/corrupt-california-cops-plant-drugs-caught-dash-cam/

REST IN PEACE, BRIAN COLLETTI

BRIAN COLLETTI was killed by Santa Clara police a few years back. The article about the event in the local newspaper was one paragraph long, and no officers were ever suspended due to the event. The "official" Santa Clara police department version was when officers confronted Brian; Brian became abusive and combative; and while placing him in "the wrap" restraining device; Brian then supposedly fell and hit his head. But Brians' parents had an independent autopsy done; and that coroner said that he had 14 separate blows to the head!? > go to: http://www.petersonhigh.com/3/miscellaneous1.htm + RELATED LINKS: X X X

Police paid to protect and serve the public instead often often than not abuse and violate the public; therefore this kind of barbarism must STOP; as we cannot call ourselves and/or consider ourselves to be a 'civilization' until we collectively start acting in a civil manner. 

This is yet one more example of a pattern of police misconduct and/or gross negligence and/or abuse and/or corruption over time on the part of the Santa Clara police department. (The anonymous source of this story has allegedly been physically beaten by Santa Clara police multiple times in past years; but prefers to remain silent beyond providing this important information)...

SEE ALSO: U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 13 › § 241
18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights  @
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241

INCIDENT #EV-98-112345 / MISTER STRUBLE

BACK IN 1998; John saw a neighbor named Mr. Struble driving by Johns' house in an unsafe manner trying to hit ducks with his car on Mr. Strubles' way to work one morning. The very next morning; John went out to the curb attempting to discourage Mr. Struble from hitting the ducks; when Mr. Struble almost hit John with his vehicle and fled the scene. 

The next morning; Mr. Struble drove by John at a very close range (John was standing on the curb); close enough for John to touch a side window on Mr. Struble's vehicle. Mr. Struble then pulled way over to the left hand side of the street and stopped his car. John went to Mr. Strubles' vehicles' drivers' side window and encouraged him to slow down. Mr. Struble then belligerently grabbed Johns' hair through his drivers' side window; then threw a lame punch. This caused John to go into the house and call the Sunnyvale police as Mr. Struble fled the scene. 

Three officers eventually arrived; and one of the officers gave John a REALLY MEAN look and immediately left the scene after slamming his door (because rumor has it that officers were being overworked at the time). John dealt with then rookie officer Discher; who was very friendly and professional; calling Mr. Struble at work to see what actually happened. Mr. Struble corroborated the account of the attack on John to officer Dischler; and officer Discher then told Mr. Struble to drive around the block after this event to avoid driving by John's house; which Mr. Struble failed to do in the following days after the initial attack. 

John then called the Sunnyvale police several times (3 times John believes) speaking one time to a female officer named offer Rice. Officer RIce was very understanding about the situation and encouraged John to let it go. But Mr. Struble was ignoring officer Dischers' orders to go around the block in the days following the attack on John; driving faster and acting even more belligerent than he was before. 

Frustrated by the lack of police support; John then attempted to communicate with Mr. Struble; leaving a note on his doorstep; including a copy of John's very first CD "Music From Outer Space" (go to: http://likroper.bandcamp.com/album/music-from-outer-space > Note: This CD was left out of the evidence at the sham trial that followed. Part of John's message to Mr. Struble was "You will (likely) be charged with attempted vehicular manslaughter. Merry Xmas" (the word likely was left out) Note: Johns' brother was killed the very next year on Christmas Eve by a man named Danny Matos; who was charged with vehicular manslaughter!?!). 

After this utilization of Johns' in/unalienable First Amendment rights; attempting to legally communicate with Mr. Struble; two Sunnyvale police officers (including officer Beninger) showed up at Johns' front door with a temporary restraining order (!?!); telling John he could not stand in the same spot he was attacked by Mr. Struble!?! The Strubles apparently created obviously opposing depositions of the event where (among other things); Mr. Struble admitted to trying to run over the ducks; and Mrs. Struble accused John of the very same thing that Mr. Struble did to John, even though Mr. Struble corroborated the story to officer Discher!?! 

John then attended the sham trial and accepted the bogus restraining order; then right after it ended; out in the lobby John asked Officer Beninger if he ever spoke to officer "Dischler" (John wrongfully added an L to officer Dischers' last name). Officer Beninger then responded with "Who's Dischler?" (in front of two witnesses including Roger Brozinich > see: "CIVIL RIGHTS TASK FORCE ETC" link below). In other words; there was apparently a disconnect between officer Discher and officer Beninger; which led to this situation. 

Officer Beninger was then fired in the following months; Sunnyvale police chief Williams resigned from his position after not responding to Johns' complaint about traffic (see scanned email correspondence document below); and a new Sunnyvale law was created requiring officers to take a report for every stop; no matter how seemingly insignificant. 

This blog post is yet another glaring example of the pattern of negligence and corruption John has experienced at the hands of the Sunnyvale police department for roughly 16 years now. This is UNACCEPTABLE and SHAMEFUL; therefore something needs to DRASTICALLY change within the culture of the Sunnyvale police department so this kind of (purposeful?) twisted travesty of justice never happens again. 

WRONGFUL DEATH LAWSUIT (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/wrongful-death-lawsuit-continued.html + CIVIL RIGHTS TASK FORCE ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/civil-rights-task-force-etc.html + DOCUMENT SUBMITTED TO SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER LISA STEINGART ON 18 OCT 2013 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/document-submitted-to-superior-court.html

DESTRUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND/OR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE? -- 

NOTICE AND AGENDA - SUNNYVALE CITY COUNCIL / TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 2006 / COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 456 WEST OLIVE AVENUE SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA - Questionable Item: 1. F. RESOLUTION MOTION - RTC 06-077 - Resolution Authorizing Destruction of Certain Documents Pertaining to Citizen Complaints/Inquiries, Internal Investigations, Applicant Backgrounds for Non-Hires, Officer Involved Vehicle Collisions, Canine Unit Training and Deployment Records and Inactive Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) Permit Documentation Eligible for Destruction / Staff Recommendation:  Council approves the resolution allowing for the destruction of specified records from the Department of Public Safety. Staff Contact:  Heather Tannehill,  (408) 730-7157 > NOTE: John finds the above item to be a bit questionable and worth bringing to your attention. Why would Sunnyvale Public Safety want to destroy documents (see: Destroying Evidence) pertaining to citizen complaints and inquiries unless they have something to hide?

JOHN WORKED WITH BOTH THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE AND SANTA CLARA TO INSTALL INCREASED SIGNAGE IN HIS NEIGHBORHOOD DURING THE MONTHS PRECEDING THIS EVENT...