ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE

QUESTION: In the State of California; all relevant evidence for court trials must be submitted and considered. So why do other police departments extensively utilize surveillance footage to solve crimes; while the Sunnyvale Police Department repeatedly refuses to do so? 

GO TO: Mercury News editorial: Security cameras can help San Jose police @ http://www.mercurynews.com/editorials/ci_25134564?source=rss

"If you're on a neighborhood e-mail list in any Silicon Valley community, you've probably seen one of these videos: a clear shot of a recognizable person walking from a car to a porch and stealing a package, probably just after a delivery truck dropped it off. All courtesy of a home security camera. We were reminded of those real-life crime snippets when San Jose Councilman Sam Liccardo made a pitch to the City Council rules committee a few weeks ago to help police connect with homeowners who'd like to help catch a criminal with their home security cameras..."

RELATED STORIES: http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_24979753/san-jose-police-would-tap-into-residents-private?source=pkg + http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_24762119/san-jose-residents-catch-brazen-casual-package-thieves?source=pkg + http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_24760598/los-altos-hills-sheriffs-office-seeking-home-burglars source=pkg

1) OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA > Smith and Ochoa refused to gather surveillance footage from the Oasis Nightclub back in April of 2012. > GO TO: https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/11/posdps-officers-smith-and-ochoa-illegal.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013_06_01_archive.html

2) JOHN'S NEIGHBOR JANE / CASE #13-3093 > For instance; John's neighbor Jane had her home burglarized. Jane was hesitant to call the police, but John insisted that she do so. Jane then called the Sunnyvale police on Johns' cell phone and they quickly responded. 

To make a long story short; one of the officers came to Johns' house to discuss what had happened to Jane, asking about any surveillance footage that may be available from the incident so they could "place the criminals at the scene of the crime". GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/06/incident-on-15-june-2013-ev13-166-206_17.html

3) INCIDENT ON 15 JUNE 2013 / EV13-166-206 > John called the Sunnyvale police and they responded promptly. John then gave the Officers a piece of paper with the photo seen here; which they took with them in order to find the suspects in question. (although they did not give John an event number for this particular incident; causing John to call the next morning and retrieve an event number from a desk officer...a desk Officer who was a bit surprised that John did not receive an event number for the incident. (The event number of this particular incident is: EV13-166-206). Note: One of the responding officers did not want to take surveillance evidence that John offered to them; and one of these Officers is the exact same Officer who helped Johns' neighbor Jane by getting surveillance evidence from John!?! > GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/witness-intimidation-andor-dissuading.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/08/photo-placing-jake-paolinetti-and.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/witness-intimidation-andor-dissuading.html

QUESTIONS: 1) Why did officers Smith and Ochoa fail to gather surveillance footage showing the attack on John that night at the Oasis Nightclub and/or why did Smith and Ochoa discriminate against John by telling John that he would be trespassing if John returned to the club (!?!) when John had recently/allegedly been attacked by karaoke host Doug!?! > 2) Why did Officers Holt and Mathers do the EXACT same thing regarding the event that occurred on 15 JUNE 2013 by failing to gather surveillance footage?!? (see below) > GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/05/johns-neighbor-jane.html > Can anyone say "reverse racial discrimination" and/or "ignoring exculpatory evidence" and/or "dereliction of duty" and/or "fucking idiotic cops"? I didn't think so.

 SEE: ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE IN THE COURT OF LAW @ http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=evid&group=00001-01000&file=350-356 > 352. The court in its discretion may exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will (a) necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice(!?!), of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury. (NOTE: ignoring exculpatory evidence = misleading the jury and/or undue prejudice)...

 SEE ALSO: OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/11/posdps-officers-smith-and-ochoa-illegal.html

Note: Since writing this Sunnyvale DPS Officer Gibo came walking through the neighborhood one night looking for surveillance footage; and yet another Sunnyvale DPS detective followed up on Officer Gibo many weeks later...Gibo apparently never retrieved the surveillance video footage I left outside; causing me to delete the footage for other footage of a white male on a bike with and American flag who was repeatedly kicking my green garbage can over in the weeks before Sunnyvale DPS took action about both the safety cone and the placement of the green garbage can with 19 MPH painted on the side for traffic calming purposes – all done with permission attained long ago from the Cities of Sunnyvale and Santa Clara...And before all of this the SCPD asked me for surveillance footage in yet another incident as well...Showing a clear pattern and practice of both good and bad police behavior; in that Gibo actually was doing what Ochoa and Smith etc should have done long ago – yet did not seem to finish the task as the female DPS detective suggested...While SCPD Officers were doing their jobs like they should have as the female DPS detective was...
                                        

INSTITUTIONALIZED REVERSE RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (continued)...

1) AFRICAN AMERICAN SINGER ATTACKED IN EAST BAY > A woman allegedly attacked a 73-year-old musician on stage after song dedicated to Trayvon Martin; leading to extensive media coverage on TV etc. QUESTION: Why was there such intensive TV etc media coverage regarding the event where a 73-year old African American singer was attacked essentially the same way John was attacked by; 1) Doug Ward at the Oasis Nightclub and/or Woodhams' Lounge; and 2) at Woodhams Lounge as well; BUT VIRTUALLY NO COVERAGE OF THE VARIOUS VIOLENT EVENTS THAT HAPPENED TO JOHN OVER A SPAN OF MANY YEARS? (GO TO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRVG-rWpemk&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug&feature=c4-overview) CAN ANYONE SAY "INSTITUTIONALIZED REVERSE RACIAL DISCRIMINATION?" I didn't think so. > GO TO: http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_2365952 2/hayward-woman-allegedly-attacks-73- year-old-musician 

2) AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENT BULLIED > Similarly; why was an African American student from San Jose State University who was allegedly bullied by his room mates given such attention for a relatively minor incident involving a few days; as opposed to the ROUGHLY 10 YEARS OF TARGETED STALKING AND HARASSMENT THAT OCCURRED AT JOHNS' RESIDENCE?! > Once again; go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRVG-rWpemk&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug&feature=c4-overview.

> The defendants face a maximum sentence of one year in county jail if convicted, prosecutors said. The 17-year-old roommate who was the alleged victim wasn't named by prosecutors. He suffered a minor injury when he fought off the bike lock around his neck, prosecutors said."I can't believe in the year 2013 that we're talking about an African-American student being treated this way," District Attorney Jeffrey F. Rosen told CNN. "We're taking this case very seriously." GO TO: http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/21/justice/san-jose-state-racial-bullying/

(QUESTION: Why isn't District Attorney Jeff Rosen taking Johns' case seriously as well? Is it really true what "they" say about attorneys being idiots? hmmm...Regardless; John can't believe in the year 2013 that we're even talking about allowing ANYBODY to be treated this way!?!).

3) OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA > Why did officers Smith and Ochoa have such an aversion to gathering surveillance footage from the Oasis Nightclub back in April of 2012? Do Smith and Ochoa actually think they can ignore exculpatory evidence and guide the case along like they are unelected/appointed judges or something? > GO TO: https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/11/posdps-officers-smith-and-ochoa-illegal.html

QUESTION: Why is the San Jose police Department talking about using residential etc security cameras to solve crimes; while the Sunnyvale Police Department refuses to do the same? (NOTE: The SJPD promised to gather footage from Woodhams Lounge regarding the October 2012 incident) > go to: Mercury News editorial: Security cameras can help San Jose police @ http://www.mercurynews.com/editorials/ci_25134564?source=rss

4) WOODHAMS LOUNGE BARTENDER RETALIATION > John was attacked at Woodhams Lounge then ejected from the club in retaliation for calling the SJPD in October of 2012. After John checked his email many months back; John found an email purposely infected with a virus sent from the bartender of Woodhams lounge!?! The email was apparently sent 3 days after a claim file was filed at the City of Sunnyvale. It is not known whether the bartender knew of the claim file at the time the email was sent. You can see a printed version of the email in question @ http://likroper.com/WOODHAMS.JPG GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/woodhams-bartender-retaliation.html

QUESTION: WHY ARE CAUCASIANS NOW BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST THE WAY AFRICAN AMERICANS USED TO BE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST? THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE; AS ALL PEOPLE NEED TO BE TREATED EQUALLY UNDER LAW WITH NO EXCEPTIONS!

NOTE: The Civil Rights Movement was originally intended by MLK to be for ALL PEOPLE; but this grand vision somehow eventually got watered down by our divisive government to the point where our country is now simply discriminating against whites the EXACT same way blacks were once discriminated against. This is not progress; THIS IS TOTAL BULLSHIT AND YOU KNOW IT!

QUESTION: Why does Aimusic School seem to have a better non-discrimination policy than the U.S. government at this point in time? (Excerpt from Metro Magazine)

THE PAOLINETTI FAMILIA: FLIGHT RISK?

Jake Paolinetti and friends have been carefully protected for several years now by the Santa Clara and/or Sunnyvale police departments; and then again lately by the Santa Clara County District Attorneys' office. But now it seems the Paolinetti family is fleeing the scene of the crime by moving out of the area. Is this move somehow an admission of guilt? We find these truths to be self evident.