The photo above shows Jake Paolinetti and two other unidentified individuals (unsuccessfully) attempting and/or conspiring to dissuade and/or intimidate John on 15 June 2013. This was roughly 4 days before John received a letter from George Hills, Incorporated inviting John to file a federal lawsuit by 12 APR 2014. The video shown above is also further proof of witness intimidation. While it is now increasingly obvious who broke Johns' windshield; no action was taken by the Sunnyvale police to find and/or question the individual and/or individuals who likely broke the windshield.
 |
"DO YOU WANT YOUR DADDY?" --
Pablo Lopez 14 JUN 2006
|
The incident that occurred on Sunday July 29th, 2007 (see below) was when the witness intimidation against John officially started (a fruitless decade long effort failing to intimidate and/or scare John). But all this has done is make John angry and ready to seek swift justice. This particular incident happened about two days before John received his very first rejection letter from the City of Santa Clara for a wrongful arrest and/or detention (and/or kidnapping) by officer Pablo Lopez. John clearly had a case against the City of Santa Clara; and they knew it. Officer Lopez was investigated and reprimanded for this wrongful arrest of John (see photo above) and officer Lopez likely faced expulsion from the ranks if any decisive action was pursued in this situation; which it was not.
Sunday, July 29, 2007 / LAYING IN WAIT, MALICIOUS VANDALISM AND ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/07/malicious-vandalism-and-attempted.html > Note: no photos of the Sunday, July 29, 2007 crime scene were taken by the responding Sunnyvale police officers; who suggested that "someone was mad" at John for something. The only person "who was mad" and/or had a clear motive against John in this case is OFFICER PABLO LOPEZ and/or THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT.
This incident occurred about less than one month later: Sunday, August 19, 2007 / THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT - THE FBI PUBLIC CORRUPTION HOTLINE - THE NIGHT SUPERVISOR AND THE GANG OF PUNKS @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/08/santa-clara-police-department-fbi.html
THE ABOVE INCIDENT IS SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE THAT MEMBERS OF THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT WERE ACTIVELY COVERING-UP FOR JAKE PAOLINETTI AND FRIENDS. IT IS JOHNS' BELIEF ROGUE MEMBERS OF THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTED THESE VARIOUS TEENAGERS TO HARASS AND STALK JOHN IN RETALIATION FOR SPEAKING OUT ABOUT THE ABUSE JOHN EXPERIENCED AT THE HANDS OF PABLO LOPEZ -- IT'S ALL ABOUT ESTABLISHING A MOTIVE FOR THIS CRIME...
CAL. PEN. CODE § 136.1 : California Code - Section 136.1
- See more @ http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/1/7/6/s136.1#sthash.Vkxa1jRX.dpuf
(a)Except as provided in subdivision (c), any person who does any of the following is guilty of a public offense and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or in the state prison:
(1)Knowingly and maliciously prevents or dissuades any witness or victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial, proceeding, or inquiry authorized by law. (2)Knowingly and maliciously attempts to prevent or dissuade any witness or victim from attending or giving testimony at any trial, proceeding, or inquiry authorized by law. (b)Except as provided in subdivision (c), every person who attempts to prevent or dissuade another person who has been the victim of a crime or who is witness to a crime from doing any of the following is guilty of a public offense and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or in the state prison:
(1)Making any report of that victimization to any peace officer or state or local law enforcement officer or probation or parole or correctional officer or prosecuting agency or to any judge. (2)Causing a complaint, indictment, information, probation or parole violation to be sought and prosecuted, and assisting in the prosecution thereof. (3)Arresting or causing or seeking the arrest of any person in connection with that victimization. (see: Lieutenant Simpson, Sunnyvale Police Officers Smith & Ochoa, Santa Clara Police Officers Lopez & Seagrave)
(c)Every person doing any of the acts described in subdivision (a) or (b) knowingly and maliciously under any one or more of the following circumstances, is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years under any of the following circumstances: (1)Where the act is accompanied by force or by an express or implied threat of force or violence, upon a witness or victim or any third person or the property of any victim, witness, or any third person. (2)Where the act is in furtherance of a conspiracy. (see: Jake Paolinetti and friends) (d)Every person attempting the commission of any act described in subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) is guilty of the offense attempted without regard to success or failure of the attempt. The fact that no person was injured physically, or in fact intimidated, shall be no defense against any prosecution under this section.
JAKE PAOLINETTI: CRIMINAL THREATS; TARGETED STALKING; HATE CRIMES; GANG ENHANCEMENTS; ETC > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdSSSANDXlE&feature=c4-overview&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug
The video seen above was the first most obvious attempt by Jake Paolinetti to dissuade John from gathering more evidence of wrongdoing. Acting as the aggressor; Jake very clearly backs up John about 20-30 feet for merely holding a video camera in the public domain where it is legal for John to do so. (John also told the 911 operator that he had legally consumed a glass of wine; and while John was legally intoxicated at the time of the call; no breath tests were conducted by the responding police officers to determine what level of intoxication; making this a "moot point" in Johns' opinion). In this You Tube video; Jake Paolinetti can be seen pushing John on the sidewalk; which is considered to be an assault in the State of California.
MENTAL ILLNESS | HATE CRIMES | CRIMINAL THREATS | STALKING | HARASSMENT ETC @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZuOygtSY6A&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug
About one month before the above incident occurred; John posted this You Tube video suggesting that Jake Paolinetti is and/or was mentally ill due to the bizarre behavior Jake has exhibited in the past. How did Johns' assessment of Jake Paolinetti get turned around and used against John? Can anyone say "psychological operations"?
NOTE: John dated a psychologist about a decade ago named Gabriele. One day between John and Gabrieles' various daily hetero localized transgressions etc; Gabriele decided to assess Johns' mental state (just for the fun of it). NOTE: Gabriele found John to be quite sane.
Furthermore; since Sunnyvale police officer Lieutenant Simpson is clearly not educated and/or trained as a psychologist; Lieutenant Simpson is therefore NOT qualified to make such a judgment about John. (John believes Lieutenant Simpson saw the situation the Sunnyvale police had worked to cover up for so long was getting out of hand; therefore Lieutenant Simpson took evasive action to avoid getting his police department in trouble).
SEE ALSO: OASIS NIGHTCLUB BARTENDER ANGIE: John called the Sunnyvale police from his cell phone on 20 april 2012 between 8 and 9 pm PDT. Oasis Nightclub bartender Angie can be heard dissuading John on this recorded call from Johns' cell phone. The female officer who took the call also clearly heard Oasis Nighclub bartender Angie dissuading a witness by telling John to leave the Oasis Nightclub in retaliation for John calling the Sunnyvale police; and this same officer even commented upon it during the call. Question: Why was no action taken regarding this event?
NOTE: John dated a psychologist about a decade ago named Gabriele. One day between John and Gabrieles' various daily hetero localized transgressions etc; Gabriele decided to assess Johns' mental state (just for the fun of it). NOTE: Gabriele found John to be quite sane.
Furthermore; since Sunnyvale police officer Lieutenant Simpson is clearly not educated and/or trained as a psychologist; Lieutenant Simpson is therefore NOT qualified to make such a judgment about John. (John believes Lieutenant Simpson saw the situation the Sunnyvale police had worked to cover up for so long was getting out of hand; therefore Lieutenant Simpson took evasive action to avoid getting his police department in trouble).
Lieutenant Simpson also suggested that John was "depressed". John was clearly not depressed at the time; as John was heading out to the Oasis Nightclub that very same night to be with his many friends that attend the club (friends that Sunnyvale police officers Smith and Ochoa have since illegally separated John from). Question: How could Lieutenant Simpson have come to such a conclusion unless there perhaps had not been misinterpreted surveillance monitoring of John being done at the time; surveillance that may have invaded Johns' privacy?
<><><>
SEE ALSO: OASIS NIGHTCLUB BARTENDER ANGIE: John called the Sunnyvale police from his cell phone on 20 april 2012 between 8 and 9 pm PDT. Oasis Nightclub bartender Angie can be heard dissuading John on this recorded call from Johns' cell phone. The female officer who took the call also clearly heard Oasis Nighclub bartender Angie dissuading a witness by telling John to leave the Oasis Nightclub in retaliation for John calling the Sunnyvale police; and this same officer even commented upon it during the call. Question: Why was no action taken regarding this event?
SEE ALSO: 18 USC § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
@ http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/1/7/6/s136.1
@ http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/1/7/6/s136.1
No comments:
Post a Comment