Saturday, February 28, 2015

KRIS DAVY (continued)...

On 30 September 2015; Johns' older sister Kris Davy filed a bogus complaint with Sunnyvale D.P.S.; who followed up on it but took no action because it was obviously a bunch of lies and half truths; and had no actual evidence to support it beyond hear say. 

John had previously called Sunnyvale D.P.S. about a month before this regarding his property being stolen by Kris; but the phone officer told John it was a civil matter. And now that Johns' neighbor Jane had her house broken into with an assigned detective afterwards; John is wondering why this matter is not being taken more seriously. Regardless; Kris continues to harass and stalk and insult John at his place of residence; threatening to take more of Johns' possessions (largely because she feels invulnerable). Kris even went as far as Dissuading a Witness by threatening John not to post the attached video showing Kris acting like a ten year old while making fun of how John walked up and down the walkway while busy one morning. Those threats obviously did not work.
WHO'S MENTALLY UNSTABLE? JOHNS' THEORY IS THAT SINCE KRIS IS A PARENT OF COLLEGE-AGED CHILDREN; THIS ALLOWS KRIS TO REMAIN IN A SEMI-DEVOLVED STATE OF BEING -- THIS KIND OF CHILDISH; SOPHOMORIC AND INSULTING BEHAVIOR TOWARDS JOHN HAPPENS ON A DAILY BASIS

SEE ALSO: INCIDENT NUMBER 142 730 223 / 30 SEP 2014 > GENDER DISCRIMINATION (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/10/incident-number-142-730-223-30-sep-2014.html + INCIDENT ON 2 JANUARY 2015 -- NEIGHBOR JANE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/02/incident-on-2-january-2015-neighbor-jane.html

Monday, February 23, 2015

GEORGE HILLS INCORPORATED (continued)...

UPDATE: John recently received three correspondence letters from the George Hills Incorporated coverup agency. But due to the fact that George Hills Incorporated is apparently nothing more than a closed loop much like police internal affairs (whereas they are not necessarily a truly unbiased third party; as they have a long history of covering up various abuses and/or unlawful violations experienced by John -- and likely many others) John will be opening those letters at a later time within six months of his civil complaint submission in January 2015. In the meantime; there are various other important Addendum Blog topics to post and consider over the next few months...

INCIDENT ON 2 JANUARY 2015 -- NEIGHBOR JANE

On January 2nd, 2015 -- exactly 7 days after John posted this > go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/12/fahrenheit-911-full-movie-in-hd.html > Johns' neighbor Jane had her house broken into. Jane was home at the time but did not hear the noise from the break-in; where the suspects kicked in two doors and quickly left. It appears the suspects did not know Jane was home at the time; then fled the scene without stealing anything. Jane called the Sunnyvale D.P.S.; who then responded. 

When dealing with the responding officers; a detective assigned to the case apparently rubbed Jane the wrong way. The way the detective was acting; questioning why Jane did not hear the disturbance etc; caused Jane to not trust this particular individual. Therefore; Jane has not contacted this questionable detective since the uncomfortable encounter. 

Note: Jane told John that she is afraid the Sunnyvale D.P.S. detective will not help her the same way John was not been helped for so many years.

QUESTIONS: John called the Sunnyvale D.P.S. non-emergency line about a month before the 30 September 2014 incident (incident number 142 730 223) telling D.P.S. about how his sister was stealing and throwing away Johns' property; not knowing what to do about it. Then a few months later the same thing happened to Johns' neighbor Jane; and when Jane called the police they responded and even sent a detective. So why are Janes' life and belongings considered to be more important than Johns'? Who are the idiots in control here?
 
JOHN'S NEIGHBOR JANE / CASE #13-3093 > For instance; John's neighbor Janes' home was burglarized. Jane was hesitant to call the police, but John insisted that she do so. Jane then called the Sunnyvale police on Johns' cell phone and they quickly responded. To make a long story short; one of the officers came to Johns' house to discuss what had happened to Jane, asking about any surveillance footage that may be available from the incident so they could "place the criminals at the scene of the crime". > GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/06/incident-on-15-june-2013-ev13-166-206_17.htm

INCIDENT ON 15 JUNE 2013 / EV13-166-206 > John called Sunnyvale D.P.S. and they responded promptly. John then gave the officers a piece of paper with the photo seen here; which they took with them in order to find the suspects in question. (although they did not give John an event number for this particular incident; causing John to call the next morning and retrieve an event number from a desk officer...a desk officer who was a bit surprised that John did not receive an event number for the incident. (The event number of this particular incident is: EV13-166-206). 

Note: One of the responding officers did not want to take surveillance evidence that John offered to them; and one of these officers is the exact same officer who helped Johns' neighbor Jane by getting surveillance evidence from John!?! So what the fuck is the matter with those worthless self-serving bastard cops down at Sunnyvale D.P.S.?!? > GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/witness-intimidation-andor-dissuading.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/08/photo-placing-jake-paolinetti-and.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/witness-intimidation-andor-dissuading.html

SEE ALSO: INCIDENT NUMBER 142 730 223 / 30 SEP 2014 > GENDER DISCRIMINATION (CONTINUED) > http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/10/incident-number-142-730-223-30-sep-2014.html + ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLEhttp://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/02/surveillance-footage-all-relevant.html

SUNNYVALE D.P.S. FIREMEN/COPS -- The City of Sunnyvale has a unique system. Police go back and forth from fire to police-related duties; and this supposedly reduces the employee turnover rate. But after many years of dealing with Sunnyvale D.P.S.; John has come to the firm conclusion that these employees make a better Fire Department than Police Department. It is difficult for any individual -- let alone a group of individuals -- to be equally good at two different tasks.

MORE QUESTIONS: WHEN NEIGHBOR JANES' PROPERTY IS AT RISK; IT IS A CRIMINAL MATTER WITH AN ASSIGNED DETECTIVE? BUT WHEN JOHNS' IMPORTANT PROPRIETARY INFORMATION PROPERTY FROM HIS BUSINESS IS AT RISK AND ACTUALLY TAMPERED WITH AND STOLEN BY HIS SISTER WHO ADMITTED TO STEALING JOHN'S PROPERTY ON VIDEO; NO ACTION IS TAKEN? WHY IS SUNNYVALE D.P.S. DISCRIMINATING AGAINST JOHN?

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

UNALIENABLE RIGHTS

The Declaration of Independence was a vaguely written document supporting the rights of a fledgling nation and people of what was to become The United States of America. But since this time when the rights of individuals were seriously taken into consideration; the United States Congress has passed numerous equally vague (and often unconstitutional) laws that instead give government the rights and/or overreach that ALL people of the United States once had. 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain Unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness..." 

OVERREACH VS OVERREACH: 
This was a carefully written document designed to limit overreach by interests in Great Britain wanting to control a fledgling United States. But since this time; the United States has been taken over by corporate interests and/or crooked politicians and/or judges wanting to water down the basic rights of all Americans. Therefore; this all leads us directly back to the Declaration of Independence and/or Unalienable Rights endowed by "their Creator"; meaning NO LIVING BEING can deny individuals of these basic rights which were essentially written in stone (and/or placed in a locked box) for all generations of Americans to enjoy their natural rights and/or ensuing natural freedoms.

A) "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States..."

B) "And to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation..."

Note: The "Laws of Nature" are rights that every living being is born with; rights that cannot be denied by ANYONE. These rights pertain to the basic freedoms nature provides for all creatures within it's realm... 

"ONES' PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS SHOULD NOT NECESSARILY BE REQUIRED TO SERVE THE COMMON GOOD; BUT IT SHOULD ALSO NOT ALTER AND/OR DISTURB THAT COMMONALITY EITHER..."

9/11 JUDGES AND THE WOLF PACK MENTALITY

Just like how packs of wolves and/or groups of domestic dogs get together at night and wreak havoc; and/or like cops who gather together and do things they would not do otherwise -- the same goes for the various judges reviewing 9-11 case files; or any case files for that matter. 

There is a certain kind of 'group think' that goes along with isolated incidents and/or influential court cases; whereas judges can often act like a pack of wolves thinking as one instead freely and/or individually. And at least part of this is rightfully based in fear; because since the 9-11 incident and later incriminating evidence showing the activities of September 11th, 2001 were IN FACT a black operation conducted by the Israelis; the United States and the U.K.

 “9/11 was an Anglo-American black operation executed 
in collusion with Israeli Secret Services.” -- 9/11 Investigator

"Undoubtedly the 9/11 attacks on New York City and Washington DC are the most misrepresented by officialdom in US history. Whereas the assassination of John F. Kennedy is now understood to have been a classic CIA Public Execution Plan, it does not come close to 9/11 in terms of the number and magnitude of outright falsehoods, misleading statements, fake science and fraudulent facts submitted by officials and agents of the US Government. The ‘official’ 9/11 Commission Report stands as the most fabricated document ever produced by US tax dollars..." -- Anonymous

MISTER OLENAK AND/OR DANNY OLENAK

MISTER OLENAKS' HAT ON JOHN'S PROPERTY AFTER MISTER OLENAKS' VICIOUS ATTACK

Not only did Mister Olenak attack John outside John's residence one morning without arrest; and then admit to the attack not only on video with no action taken to arrest mister Olenak by the Santa Clara police department -- but also in front of Judge Louis Amadeo, Junior as well with no action taken. 

And there is another side to this story. Sometime back during the late 1970s and/or early 1980s; one of Johns' long time neighbors Bobby Martinez was once approached by Mister Olenaks' son Danny (and Dannys' shotgun); offering Bobby to come along and rob the old Victoria Station steakhouse on Homestead Road in Cupertino. Bobby declined the offer; but Danny allegedly proceeded to carry out the robbery without Bobby. And then Danny later went on an interstate liquor store robbing spree; and was eventually apprehended in Oklahoma (I believe). 

Danny was released from prison a few years later and has kept out of trouble ever since. But the problem is; Danny once bragged to John about how he and Kurt Bangart (from Doon Court) had tortured cats in horrific ways (firecrackers placed within body cavities; dropped alive from bridges onto passing trains etc etc etc -- John also witnessed Kurt and Dannys' mass torture of frogs in Kurts' backyard from the local Calabazas Creek; and this evil behavior later manifested as violence against cats; and then people). Danny also once scrawled anti-semitic messages into the fresh cement of Johns' Jewish ex-neighbors the Yellin family. And guess where it all started? Yup. The apple does not fall far from the tree. > GO TO: MISTER OLENAKS' ADMISSION OF GUILT @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/06/mister-olenaks-admission-of-guilt.html

SEE ALSO: ANIMAL CRUELTY AND HUMAN VIOLENCE 

QUESTION: ARE THERE ANY UNSOLVED COLD CASE MURDERS CONNECTED TO DANNY OLENAK?

JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO JUNIOR -- After the Administrative hearing with Louis Amadeo, Junior in the City of Santa Clara back in 2007; John found out that Judge Amadeo was actually hired by the City of Santa Clara to perform his services; meaning there was a MASSIVE conflict of interest where Judge Amadeo was actually hired to come up with judgements favorable to the City of Santa Clara. It should appear obvious that Mister Amadeo was not a true unbiased third party; and instead was hired by the City of Santa Clara to help avoid inevitable lawsuits from John and potentially others.

GO TO: JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO JUNIOR
http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/judge-louis-amadeo-junior.html

NOTE: PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING is usually reserved for those who are a harm to themselves or others, so why were John's various attackers not given psychological testing for their attacks? And what does this say about police violence against those they were sworn to protect and serve? > GO TO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRVG-rWpemk

"I have several cops as patients. They scare me. They really do. They often score the same on personality disorder tests as violent criminals. No shit" -- Anonymous Psychologist

Thursday, February 12, 2015

THE PENTAGON PAPERS


At the time of the release of these documents; the United States government was adamant they not be released to the general public (and for obvious reasons -- because they were embarrassing -- yet clearly within the public interest as history has shown) And! the impeachment of President Richard Nixon had as much to do with not only Mister Nixons' obvious bad deeds; but also revenge -- as an F.B.I. agent who did not get promoted then retaliated in a rather unsavory fashion. 
And! now we have the almost exact same situation going on; A) a federal government who has clearly NOT been doing activities that are within the public interest; B) a federal government allowing mass surveillance WAY beyond the scope of Richard Nixons' mere bugging of the Democratic party headquarters; C) a federal government allowing mass surveillance as much for the financial advantage of wealthy corporate ogilarchs -- as for any supposed National Security purposes -- and also; D) a federal government that will clearly go to ANY length to obstruct justice and/or ignore exculpatory evidence and/or suppress evidence and/or etc etc etc while locking up others for doing the exact same thing; and E) there is no E right now; but when i think of one i will tell you.

But! unfortunately...as John's official legal representative; I would tend to think as long as legitimate legal representatives like me can have their civil rights violated by being intimidated and/or coerced and/or scared into submission by a government full of control freaks bent on command and control (of taxpayer-funded nonsense and/or folly and/or chaos); as long as yet another fool can keep even more all-important files away from the scrutiny of the people of the United States; and similarly as long as these same files can be kept from the eyes of juries to bring about due process and/or justice wherever applicable...maybe...just maybe yet another important period in American history can be kept under wraps and remain unnoticed? > go to: WIKILEAKS @ https://wikileaks.org/

SEE ALSO: A MOUNTAIN RANGE OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE @
  "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself" -- Martin Luther King, Jr

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

COINTELPRO METHODS (continued)...


HOW ANGRY WAS OFFICER PABLO LOPEZ WHEN JOHN FILED AN INITIAL CLAIM REGARDING JOHNS' FALSE ARREST? | CA PENAL CODE SECTIONS 236-237 + CFR › Title 25 › Chapter I › Subchapter B › Part 11 › Subpart D › Section 11.404 25 CFR § 11.404 False imprisonment (photo shows Officer Lopez being investigated at the Lake Terrace Apartments after Johns' false arrest) 

COINTELPRO METHODS: A) Harassment Through the Legal System: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They discriminated when they enforced tax laws and other government regulations and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters -- B) Extralegal Force and Violence: The FBI and police threatened, instigated, and themselves conducted break-ins, vandalism, assaults, and beatings. The object was to frighten dissidents and disrupt their movements. In the case of radical Black and Puerto Rican activists (and later Native Americans), these attacks—including political assassinations—were so extensive, vicious, and calculated that they can accurately be termed a form of official "terrorism." 

SEE ALSO: COINTELPRO @ http://vault.fbi.gov/cointel-pro + http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO + THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

QUESTIONS: A MOVIE CALLED "LAKEVIEW TERRACE" THEN DEBUTED AROUND THE SAME TIME ALL OF THIS WAS HAPPENING. HOW MUCH DID THE N.S.A. KNOW ABOUT JOHNS' SITUATION AT THE TIME? IF THE INFORMATION IN QUESTION WAS AND/OR IS TOO SENSITIVE TO LITIGATE IN PUBLIC; WHY WAS AND/OR IS THIS SAME INFORMATION NOT TOO SENSITIVE TO LITIGATE IN A PUBLIC MOVIE THEATER? > http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/lakeviewterrace/ 

It seems as though all of those elitist ogilarchs down in Hollywood who have access to the NSA surveillance feed (and/or all of our personal information) think they can use it mainly for profit rather than to bring justice; as most surveillance does. Since when is surveillance being allowed to be used for personal profit; while celebrating the downfall of innocent lives?

THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT - THE FBI PUBLIC CORRUPTION HOTLINE - THE NIGHT SUPERVISOR AND THE GANG OF PUNKS @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/08/santa-clara-police-department-fbi.html

The link seen above was a major turning point in John's multi-year investigation into who was behind the night time disturbances and attacks at his residence. After John called Sunnyvale D.P.S. about his bullet-riddled windshield; John then noticed a Santa Clara police vehicle travelling OUT OF IT'S JURISDICTION; and swerving down Thunderbird Avenue in an unusual fashion (as if the officer was inebriated); which then turned into Doon Court where the Rebholtz family lives.  

This unknown 'bad excuse for a cop' then exited Doon Court and escorted a gang of teenagers coming from the Rebholtz residence out of Doon Court and onto Bluebird Avenue; where they went to the Paolinetti residence thereafter. 

And not only did this crooked Santa Clara cop fail to question these obvious persons of interest; but he also had the gall to protect them and prohibit John from taking any photos of them to place them near the scene of the crime. Adding to this; this same officer then threatened John for (legally) pointing a camera at him; calling John a "troublemaker". The biggest regret John has is failing to video record his interaction with this particular crooked Santa Clara cop; who was desperately trying to intimidate John. At this point in time; it was clear to John that there was some kind of conspiracy involved between certain members of the Santa Clara Police Department; and the people involved in harassing and stalking John. Was somebody angry that John had filed a claim against the Santa Clara Police Department? Somebody like Officer Pablo Lopez and/or his cop buddy Don Paolinetti?

John also called Sunnyvale D.P.S. about the broken windshield; who then responded and talked to John's neighbor Albert Martinez in John's driveway. These officers did not take any photos of the vandalism in question to gather evidence of the crime; and these same officers also allegedly told Albert that this incident was also John's fault; blaming the vandalism on content in Johns' web site.

Around this time; another vehicle passed by Johns' residence and threw something out of the window onto the street. Responding to this; Albert's son in law (the son of a Sunnyvale D.P.S. officer) then followed the suspects back to their house and questioned them (since Sunnyvale police refused to further investigate the incident). John then contacted the F.B.I. Public Corruption Hotline and told them of this questionable incident; and John also called the night Supervisor of the apparently drunk Santa Clara officer in question; reporting the incident at this time. No action was taken by the F.B.I. to investigate this situation or prevent further disturbances. (42 U.S. Code § 1986 | Action for neglect to prevent) > SEE ALSO: TERRORIST SEAGRAVE @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2008/07/terrorist-seagrave-x-13.html