VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 + RETALIATION AGAINST A WHISTLE BLOWER (CONTINUED)...

John will not be participating in yet another election on November 4, 2014. 

> GO TO: VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 + RETALIATION AGAINST A WHISTLE BLOWER (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/06/violation-of-voting-rights-act-of-1965.html + VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 + RETALIATION AGAINST A WHISTLE BLOWER (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/violation-of-voting-rights-act-of-1965.html 

 

8 nov 2011 @ 7:24 AM -- In the photos seen above are two witnesses to the event (witnesses A and B -- see Sunnyvale police car in the background); these witnesses have seen John clean up litter in the neighborhood for many years now without incident. Note: The dog on the left fell ill after this incident and was put to sleep ever since dangerous pesticides were applied to the Peterson field. The dog suddenly had a tumor appear in his nose; the same snout he used to sniff around on the field were the poison was applied (Peterson Middle School Principal Katherine Harris is largely responsible for this act of animal cruelty).

VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 / SEC. 11. (a) No person acting under color of law shall fail or refuse to permit any person to vote who is entitled to vote under any provision of this Act or is otherwise qualified to vote, or willfully fail or refuse to tabulate, count, and report such person's vote. (b) No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for voting or attempting to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for urging or aiding any person to vote or attempt to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for exercising any powers or duties under section 3(a), 6,8,9,10, or 12 (e). > go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965

  

RELATED LINK: In the eyes of many elite observers, the pro-democracy protesters occupying streets and plazas in Hong Kong’s business and political core are hopelessly naive. Though the city is mostly self-governing, Beijing has power over its political development, and the mainland’s ruling Communist Party is unlikely to accede to popular demands for unfettered democracy. Changing course amid the dramatic popular protests of recent days could encourage subversive ideas among Chinese citizens elsewhere. Rather than encouraging change, disorder in Hong Kong could confirm Beijing’s worst fears about loosening up. > http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hong-kong-protesters-might-gain-some-ground-for-democracy/2014/09/29/a2586008-47fb-11e4-a046-120a8a855cca_story.html + VOTER INTIMIDATION: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OR ALL RIGHTS REVERSED? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/voter-intimidation.html