COINTELPRO METHODS (continued)...

HOW ANGRY WAS OFFICER PABLO LOPEZ WHEN JOHN FILED AN INITIAL CLAIM REGARDING JOHNS' FALSE ARREST? | CA PENAL CODE SECTIONS 236-237 + CFR › Title 25 › Chapter I › Subchapter B › Part 11 › Subpart D › Section 11.404 25 CFR § 11.404 False imprisonment (photo shows Officer Lopez being investigated at the Lake Terrace Apartments after Johns' false arrest) 

COINTELPRO METHODS: A) Harassment Through the Legal System: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They discriminated when they enforced tax laws and other government regulations and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters -- B) Extralegal Force and Violence: The FBI and police threatened, instigated, and themselves conducted break-ins, vandalism, assaults, and beatings. The object was to frighten dissidents and disrupt their movements. In the case of radical Black and Puerto Rican activists (and later Native Americans), these attacks—including political assassinations—were so extensive, vicious, and calculated that they can accurately be termed a form of official "terrorism." 

SEE ALSO: COINTELPRO @ http://vault.fbi.gov/cointel-pro + http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO + THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

QUESTIONS: A MOVIE CALLED "LAKEVIEW TERRACE" THEN DEBUTED AROUND THE SAME TIME ALL OF THIS WAS HAPPENING. HOW MUCH DID THE N.S.A. KNOW ABOUT JOHNS' SITUATION AT THE TIME? IF THE INFORMATION IN QUESTION WAS AND/OR IS TOO SENSITIVE TO LITIGATE IN PUBLIC; WHY WAS AND/OR IS THIS SAME INFORMATION NOT TOO SENSITIVE TO LITIGATE IN A PUBLIC MOVIE THEATER? > http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/lakeviewterrace/ 

It seems as though all of those elitist ogilarchs down in Hollywood who have access to the NSA surveillance feed (and/or all of our personal information) think they can use it mainly for profit rather than to bring justice; as most surveillance does. Since when is surveillance being allowed to be used for personal profit; while celebrating the downfall of innocent lives?

THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT - THE FBI PUBLIC CORRUPTION HOTLINE - THE NIGHT SUPERVISOR AND THE GANG OF PUNKS @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/08/santa-clara-police-department-fbi.html

The link seen above was a major turning point in John's multi-year investigation into who was behind the night time disturbances and attacks at his residence. After John called Sunnyvale D.P.S. about his bullet-riddled windshield; John then noticed a Santa Clara police vehicle travelling OUT OF IT'S JURISDICTION; and swerving down Thunderbird Avenue in an unusual fashion (as if the officer was inebriated); which then turned into Doon Court where the Rebholtz family lives.  

This unknown 'bad excuse for a cop' then exited Doon Court and escorted a gang of teenagers coming from the Rebholtz residence out of Doon Court and onto Bluebird Avenue; where they went to the Paolinetti residence thereafter. 

And not only did this crooked Santa Clara cop fail to question these obvious persons of interest; but he also had the gall to protect them and prohibit John from taking any photos of them to place them near the scene of the crime. Adding to this; this same officer then threatened John for (legally) pointing a camera at him; calling John a "troublemaker". The biggest regret John has is failing to video record his interaction with this particular crooked Santa Clara cop; who was desperately trying to intimidate John. At this point in time; it was clear to John that there was some kind of conspiracy involved between certain members of the Santa Clara Police Department; and the people involved in harassing and stalking John. Was somebody angry that John had filed a claim against the Santa Clara Police Department? Somebody like Officer Pablo Lopez and/or his cop buddy Don Paolinetti?

John also called Sunnyvale D.P.S. about the broken windshield; who then responded and talked to John's neighbor Albert Martinez in John's driveway. These officers did not take any photos of the vandalism in question to gather evidence of the crime; and these same officers also allegedly told Albert that this incident was also John's fault; blaming the vandalism on content in Johns' web site.

Around this time; another vehicle passed by Johns' residence and threw something out of the window onto the street. Responding to this; Albert's son in law (the son of a Sunnyvale D.P.S. officer) then followed the suspects back to their house and questioned them (since Sunnyvale police refused to further investigate the incident). John then contacted the F.B.I. Public Corruption Hotline and told them of this questionable incident; and John also called the night Supervisor of the apparently drunk Santa Clara officer in question; reporting the incident at this time. No action was taken by the F.B.I. to investigate this situation or prevent further disturbances. (42 U.S. Code § 1986 | Action for neglect to prevent) > SEE ALSO: TERRORIST SEAGRAVE @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2008/07/terrorist-seagrave-x-13.html