Tuesday, September 22, 2015

18 U.S. CODE - FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS ETC

Defendants made numerous false statements about Plaintiff over the last decade; mischaracterizing events and misleading authorities to the wrong conclusion in the process. The truth; the whole truth; and nothing but the truth must be presented within ALL legal proceedings and/or ALL police encounters etc at ALL times or various laws will be broken in the process.

FOR INSTANCE:
1) THE REVOLVING DOOR OF STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv > Even though mountains of video evidence exist proving otherwise; John was accused of stalking by Defendant Sunnyvale D.P.S.; when it was clearly evident that John was (and still is) the one being stalked and harassed and menaced etc.

2) NEIGHBORHOOD COPWATCH: RESIDENCE ALMOST STORMED AND 'SUSPECT' SHOT AT FOR PICKING UP LITTER? @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzXCvv9g9eI

Police Supervisor claimed that a bull horn was used during this incident; when it clearly was not. Many neighbors witnessed the event as well and heard no bull horn used during the incident. The Police Supervisor not only made false statements in this incidents' police report; but the idiot/moron/imbecile mentality level punk responsible for the incident made false statements as well. Since when do we allow idiots and/or morons and/or imbeciles to run our society? 


(Imbecile was a medical category of people with moderate to severe intellectual disability, as well as a type of criminal. The term arises from the Latin word imbecillus, meaning weak, or weak-minded. It included people with an IQ of 26–50, between "moron" (IQ of 51–70) and "idiot" (IQ of 0–25). > go to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imbecile. "Moron" was coined in 1910 by psychologist Henry H. Goddard from the Ancient Greek word ยต???? (moros), which meant "dull" (as opposed to oxy, which meant "sharp" (see also: oxymoron)), and used to describe a person with a mental age in adulthood of between 8 and 12 on the Binet scale) > go to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moron_(psychology)).

Adding to this; Sunnyvale D.P.S. had lots of prior knowledge of Johns' various good deeds; as Sunnyvale D.P.S. repeatedly questionably questioned Johns' good intentions regarding his litter cleanup through various means prior to this incident.

For instance; a few weeks before the aforementioned event where John was wrongfully shot at by Sunnyvale D.P.S.; John was cleaning up litter in the neighborhood as usual when John came upon a discarded Playskool kiddie toilet near Teal Drive. Assuming the kiddie toilet belonged to the day care center over the fence; John carefully placed the kiddie toilet on the other side of an adjacent fence to return it to who John thought to be the rightful owners of the kiddie toilet. 

When John returned home to his place of residence; a Sunnyvale D.P.S. Officer (a latino male) arrived at Johns' residence shortly after asking about the kiddie toilet. John led the Officer to a trash can on the side yard to show 'evidence' of what John was doing; to which the Officer responded by saying that John was in fact doing a good deed. The Officer then filled out a green colored card regarding the incident; saying it would be on file at Sunnyvale D.P.S. for future reference. 

QUESTION: Where is this particular green colored card proving prior knowledge of Johns' valiant litter clean up efforts, and/or was this evidence destroyed?

NOTE: After the "NEIGHBORHOOD COPWATCH: RESIDENCE ALMOST STORMED AND 'SUSPECT' SHOT AT FOR PICKING UP LITTER?" incident seen above; Johns' alleged CIA buddy told John quite frankly: "They have it out for you"; (In other words; Sunnyvale D.P.S. had and/or has it out for John) regarding this particular event; otherwise they would not have done this to someone cleaning up litter. These are but two 'good' examples of various false statements made by Defendants over the last decade.  > GO TO: LRE RESEARCH @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/01/lre-research.html
 
SEE ALSO: EXCERPTS FROM LIKROPER.COM AND/OR THE ADDENDUM BLOG: TIMELINE: ACTIVIST TARGETED FOR DISSENT? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/05/timeline-activist-targeted-for-dissent.html: "25 jan 2005 / A SUNNYVALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING THE PETERSON FIELD ON TUESDAY JANUARY 24TH 2006 @ 7PM WAS HELD IN THE COUNCIL TORTURE CHAMBERS!?! > 4) WHY HAVE I BEEN REPEATEDLY HASSLED BY THE SUNNYVALE POLICE ABOUT EVERYTHING FROM PICKING UP LITTER TO PUTTING A SAFETY CONE OUT IN THE STREET SINCE STARTING MY OPPOSITION TO THE FIELD PLAN?"
 

18 U.S. CODE § 1001 - STATEMENTS OR ENTRIES GENERALLY


(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully — (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years. > GO TO: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

CA Civ Code § 1570 (2013) / Menace consists in a threat: 1) Of such duress as is specified in Subdivisions 1 and 3 of the last section; 2) Of unlawful and violent injury to the person or property of any such person as is specified in the last section; or, 3) Of injury to the character of any such person.

1571.  Fraud is either actual or constructive. / 1572.  Actual fraud, within the meaning of this Chapter, consists in any of the following acts, committed by a party to the contract, or with his connivance, with intent to deceive another party thereto, or to induce him to enter into the contract: 1) The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true; 2) The positive assertion, in a manner not warranted by the information of the person making it, of that which is not true, though he believes it to be true; 3) The suppression of that which is true, by one having knowledge or belief of the fact; 4) A promise made without any intention of performing it; or, 5) Any other act fitted to deceive. > GO TO: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=civgrup=01001-02000&file=1565-1590 + SEE ALSO: http://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2015/09/dangerous-vaccines-andor-scientific.html

"THE TRUTH; THE WHOLE TRUTH; AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH..."

1 comment:

  1. *Special thanks goes out to Andrew Napolitano for this blog post...

    ReplyDelete