EVER SINCE THE AFOREMENTIONED 2 JANUARY 2015 INCIDENT; the Reboholtz family has been parking their cars in Janes' driveway to help her out. But the problem is; the car in the driveway seen in the photo was one of the vehicles used in the harassment campaign against John. And while on the outside this looks like a perfectly harmless act of neighbor helping neighbor; this is also a very subtle yet malicious attempt by the Rebholtz family to very nicely dissuade and/or tamper with witness Jane so she will not testifying against the family if it ever came to that.
Once again; John strongly believes the Rebholtz family is attempting to subtly and very nicely dissuade witness Jane in an attempt to cover up Rebholtz family involvement in the extended harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing campaign directed at John. Jane heard and/or witnessed many of the numerous night time disturbances sponsored by the Rebholtz family; and Jane was awakened several times; including John and other neighbors as well.
John strongly suspects the Rebholtzs' children may have been directly involved in the 2 January 2015 incident -- as John dropped off a live Christmas tree on Janes' doorstep around 6pm or so on 2 January 2015; and at that time noticed several vehicles parked in Doon Court; including vehicles belonging to friends of the Rebholtz brothers' gang.
These aforementioned unknown individuals should not be discounted as possible suspects. John also supplied surveillance footage for Jane that views the side of the house the suspects exited. John is not sure if it as been officially processed by law enforcement.
QUESTION: Why would the Rebholtz family help one neighbor; while throwing another neighbor John 'under the bus' so to speak with a bogus complaint? Shouldn't neighbors help all neighbors as John does; instead of just some of them?
Once again; John strongly believes the Rebholtz family is attempting to subtly and very nicely dissuade witness Jane in an attempt to cover up Rebholtz family involvement in the extended harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing campaign directed at John. Jane heard and/or witnessed many of the numerous night time disturbances sponsored by the Rebholtz family; and Jane was awakened several times; including John and other neighbors as well.
John strongly suspects the Rebholtzs' children may have been directly involved in the 2 January 2015 incident -- as John dropped off a live Christmas tree on Janes' doorstep around 6pm or so on 2 January 2015; and at that time noticed several vehicles parked in Doon Court; including vehicles belonging to friends of the Rebholtz brothers' gang.
These aforementioned unknown individuals should not be discounted as possible suspects. John also supplied surveillance footage for Jane that views the side of the house the suspects exited. John is not sure if it as been officially processed by law enforcement.
MORE QUESTIONS: Since the incident that occurred on 15 December 2013 originated from the Rebholtz residence -- and was very similar to what happened at Janes' residence on 2 January 2015 (and also happened at relatively the same time of year in late December / early January); then why wouldn't the same individuals involved in the incident at Johns' residence do the exact same thing to another neighbor Jane? Was the 2 January 2015 incident a continuation of a conspiracy?
While the Rebholtz family has not necessarily broken any other laws with their friendly dissuasion and/or witness tampering of Jane; Jake Paolinetti is still nonetheless guilty of Tampering with a Witness and/or Conspiracy -- and Officers Holt and Mathers concealed an object with intent to impair the object’s
integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding. > go to: INCIDENT ON 15 JUNE 2013 / EV13-166-206 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/06/incident-on-15-june-2013-ev13-166-206_17.html
18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant / SECTION 3 (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding [see: Holt/Mathers] (3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation [1] supervised release; [1] parole, or release pending judicial proceedings; > go to: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512
UPDATE: FEMALE DUCK FOUND DEAD 7 MARCH 2015
SEE ALSO: INCIDENT ON 15 DECEMBER 2013 -- EV 133490020 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/incident-on-15-december-2013.html + INCIDENT ON 2 JANUARY 2015 -- NEIGHBOR JANE http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/02/incident-on-2-january-2015-neighbor-jane.html
SEE ALSO: INCIDENT ON 15 DECEMBER 2013 -- EV 133490020 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/incident-on-15-december-2013.html + INCIDENT ON 2 JANUARY 2015 -- NEIGHBOR JANE http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/02/incident-on-2-january-2015-neighbor-jane.html
No comments:
Post a Comment