ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE

QUESTION: In the State of California; all relevant evidence for court trials must be submitted and considered. So why do other police departments extensively utilize surveillance footage to solve crimes; while the Sunnyvale Police Department repeatedly refuses to do so? 

GO TO: Mercury News editorial: Security cameras can help San Jose police @ http://www.mercurynews.com/editorials/ci_25134564?source=rss

"If you're on a neighborhood e-mail list in any Silicon Valley community, you've probably seen one of these videos: a clear shot of a recognizable person walking from a car to a porch and stealing a package, probably just after a delivery truck dropped it off. All courtesy of a home security camera. We were reminded of those real-life crime snippets when San Jose Councilman Sam Liccardo made a pitch to the City Council rules committee a few weeks ago to help police connect with homeowners who'd like to help catch a criminal with their home security cameras..."

RELATED STORIES: http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_24979753/san-jose-police-would-tap-into-residents-private?source=pkg + http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_24762119/san-jose-residents-catch-brazen-casual-package-thieves?source=pkg + http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_24760598/los-altos-hills-sheriffs-office-seeking-home-burglars source=pkg

1) OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA > Smith and Ochoa refused to gather surveillance footage from the Oasis Nightclub back in April of 2012. > GO TO: https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/11/posdps-officers-smith-and-ochoa-illegal.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013_06_01_archive.html

2) JOHN'S NEIGHBOR JANE / CASE #13-3093 > For instance; John's neighbor Jane had her home burglarized. Jane was hesitant to call the police, but John insisted that she do so. Jane then called the Sunnyvale police on Johns' cell phone and they quickly responded. 

To make a long story short; one of the officers came to Johns' house to discuss what had happened to Jane, asking about any surveillance footage that may be available from the incident so they could "place the criminals at the scene of the crime". GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/06/incident-on-15-june-2013-ev13-166-206_17.html

3) INCIDENT ON 15 JUNE 2013 / EV13-166-206 > John called the Sunnyvale police and they responded promptly. John then gave the Officers a piece of paper with the photo seen here; which they took with them in order to find the suspects in question. (although they did not give John an event number for this particular incident; causing John to call the next morning and retrieve an event number from a desk officer...a desk Officer who was a bit surprised that John did not receive an event number for the incident. (The event number of this particular incident is: EV13-166-206). Note: One of the responding officers did not want to take surveillance evidence that John offered to them; and one of these Officers is the exact same Officer who helped Johns' neighbor Jane by getting surveillance evidence from John!?! > GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/witness-intimidation-andor-dissuading.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/08/photo-placing-jake-paolinetti-and.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/witness-intimidation-andor-dissuading.html

QUESTIONS: 1) Why did officers Smith and Ochoa fail to gather surveillance footage showing the attack on John that night at the Oasis Nightclub and/or why did Smith and Ochoa discriminate against John by telling John that he would be trespassing if John returned to the club (!?!) when John had recently/allegedly been attacked by karaoke host Doug!?! > 2) Why did Officers Holt and Mathers do the EXACT same thing regarding the event that occurred on 15 JUNE 2013 by failing to gather surveillance footage?!? (see below) > GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/05/johns-neighbor-jane.html > Can anyone say "reverse racial discrimination" and/or "ignoring exculpatory evidence" and/or "dereliction of duty" and/or "fucking idiotic cops"? I didn't think so.

 SEE: ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE IN THE COURT OF LAW @ http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=evid&group=00001-01000&file=350-356 > 352. The court in its discretion may exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will (a) necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice(!?!), of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury. (NOTE: ignoring exculpatory evidence = misleading the jury and/or undue prejudice)...

 SEE ALSO: OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/11/posdps-officers-smith-and-ochoa-illegal.html

Note: Since writing this Sunnyvale DPS Officer Gibo came walking through the neighborhood one night looking for surveillance footage; and yet another Sunnyvale DPS detective followed up on Officer Gibo many weeks later...Gibo apparently never retrieved the surveillance video footage I left outside; causing me to delete the footage for other footage of a white male on a bike with and American flag who was repeatedly kicking my green garbage can over in the weeks before Sunnyvale DPS took action about both the safety cone and the placement of the green garbage can with 19 MPH painted on the side for traffic calming purposes – all done with permission attained long ago from the Cities of Sunnyvale and Santa Clara...And before all of this the SCPD asked me for surveillance footage in yet another incident as well...Showing a clear pattern and practice of both good and bad police behavior; in that Gibo actually was doing what Ochoa and Smith etc should have done long ago – yet did not seem to finish the task as the female DPS detective suggested...While SCPD Officers were doing their jobs like they should have as the female DPS detective was...
                                        

INSTITUTIONALIZED REVERSE RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (continued)...

1) AFRICAN AMERICAN SINGER ATTACKED IN EAST BAY > A woman allegedly attacked a 73-year-old musician on stage after song dedicated to Trayvon Martin; leading to extensive media coverage on TV etc. QUESTION: Why was there such intensive TV etc media coverage regarding the event where a 73-year old African American singer was attacked essentially the same way John was attacked by; 1) Doug Ward at the Oasis Nightclub and/or Woodhams' Lounge; and 2) at Woodhams Lounge as well; BUT VIRTUALLY NO COVERAGE OF THE VARIOUS VIOLENT EVENTS THAT HAPPENED TO JOHN OVER A SPAN OF MANY YEARS? (GO TO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRVG-rWpemk&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug&feature=c4-overview) CAN ANYONE SAY "INSTITUTIONALIZED REVERSE RACIAL DISCRIMINATION?" I didn't think so. > GO TO: http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_2365952 2/hayward-woman-allegedly-attacks-73- year-old-musician 

2) AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENT BULLIED > Similarly; why was an African American student from San Jose State University who was allegedly bullied by his room mates given such attention for a relatively minor incident involving a few days; as opposed to the ROUGHLY 10 YEARS OF TARGETED STALKING AND HARASSMENT THAT OCCURRED AT JOHNS' RESIDENCE?! > Once again; go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRVG-rWpemk&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug&feature=c4-overview.

> The defendants face a maximum sentence of one year in county jail if convicted, prosecutors said. The 17-year-old roommate who was the alleged victim wasn't named by prosecutors. He suffered a minor injury when he fought off the bike lock around his neck, prosecutors said."I can't believe in the year 2013 that we're talking about an African-American student being treated this way," District Attorney Jeffrey F. Rosen told CNN. "We're taking this case very seriously." GO TO: http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/21/justice/san-jose-state-racial-bullying/

(QUESTION: Why isn't District Attorney Jeff Rosen taking Johns' case seriously as well? Is it really true what "they" say about attorneys being idiots? hmmm...Regardless; John can't believe in the year 2013 that we're even talking about allowing ANYBODY to be treated this way!?!).

3) OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA > Why did officers Smith and Ochoa have such an aversion to gathering surveillance footage from the Oasis Nightclub back in April of 2012? Do Smith and Ochoa actually think they can ignore exculpatory evidence and guide the case along like they are unelected/appointed judges or something? > GO TO: https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/11/posdps-officers-smith-and-ochoa-illegal.html

QUESTION: Why is the San Jose police Department talking about using residential etc security cameras to solve crimes; while the Sunnyvale Police Department refuses to do the same? (NOTE: The SJPD promised to gather footage from Woodhams Lounge regarding the October 2012 incident) > go to: Mercury News editorial: Security cameras can help San Jose police @ http://www.mercurynews.com/editorials/ci_25134564?source=rss

4) WOODHAMS LOUNGE BARTENDER RETALIATION > John was attacked at Woodhams Lounge then ejected from the club in retaliation for calling the SJPD in October of 2012. After John checked his email many months back; John found an email purposely infected with a virus sent from the bartender of Woodhams lounge!?! The email was apparently sent 3 days after a claim file was filed at the City of Sunnyvale. It is not known whether the bartender knew of the claim file at the time the email was sent. You can see a printed version of the email in question @ http://likroper.com/WOODHAMS.JPG GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/woodhams-bartender-retaliation.html

QUESTION: WHY ARE CAUCASIANS NOW BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST THE WAY AFRICAN AMERICANS USED TO BE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST? THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE; AS ALL PEOPLE NEED TO BE TREATED EQUALLY UNDER LAW WITH NO EXCEPTIONS!

NOTE: The Civil Rights Movement was originally intended by MLK to be for ALL PEOPLE; but this grand vision somehow eventually got watered down by our divisive government to the point where our country is now simply discriminating against whites the EXACT same way blacks were once discriminated against. This is not progress; THIS IS TOTAL BULLSHIT AND YOU KNOW IT!

QUESTION: Why does Aimusic School seem to have a better non-discrimination policy than the U.S. government at this point in time? (Excerpt from Metro Magazine)

THE PAOLINETTI FAMILIA: FLIGHT RISK?

Jake Paolinetti and friends have been carefully protected for several years now by the Santa Clara and/or Sunnyvale police departments; and then again lately by the Santa Clara County District Attorneys' office. But now it seems the Paolinetti family is fleeing the scene of the crime by moving out of the area. Is this move somehow an admission of guilt? We find these truths to be self evident.

KAREN SINUNU'S SUDDEN LEAVE OF ABSENCE #2 / 16 DECEMBER 2013

The very same day John was wrongfully arrested (and/or therefore kidnapped on 14 June 2006) by Santa Clara police officer Pablo Lopez while feeding ducks across the street where he had done so for many years (under a duck crossing sign that both the City of Santa Clara and the City of Sunnyvale installed); SANTA CLARA COUNTY DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY KAREN SINUNU-TOWERY TOOK A SUDDEN LEAVE OF ABSENCE FROM HER JOB!? > Go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/karen-sinunus-mysterious-leave-of.html

Then once again in late 2013; Karyn Sinunu-Towery hastily left her post once again exactly one day after this event on December 15th 2013 (Go to: INCIDENT ON 15 DECEMBER 2013 -- EV 133490020 > Go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/incident-on-15-december-2013.html and/or http://beta.congress.gov/congressional-record/2013/12/16/extensions-of-remarks-section/article/E1882-2)

Are Karen Sinunu-Towery's recent questionable actions the result of some sort of cover-up on the part of the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office? It may sound like a stretch; but Karyn's seemingly evasive actions strongly suggest that Karyn Sinunu-Towery left her position in haste once again in response to something that happened to John. Is there any truth to this and/or has anybody investigated this angle?

ZOE LOFGREN stated @ http://beta.congress.gov/congressional-record/2013/12/16/extensions-of-remarks-section/article/E1882-2; regarding Kary Sinunu-Towery: "She personally worked to free defendants wrongly convicted and is a model for prosecutors everywhere in this regard." 

QUESTION: Why didn't Karyn Sinunu-Towery come to the rescue for John as well? Could there be some sort of gender-based conflict of interest here? hmmm...

THERE GOES THE NEIGHBORHOOD?

1) MATERIAL WITNESSES -- Two neighbors who live near John are willing to provide witness testimony regarding the multi-year Civil Harassment campaign John experienced. Johns' entire neighborhood was essentially being harassed and bothered in the process; but John is the only one who officially came forward about it (note: the term "Material Witness" generally applies to criminal cases; but that is precisely what this case should be).

A) WITNESS X -- John's Russian immigrant neighbor was awakened on several occasions by the disturbances made by Jake Paolinetti and his friends. Part of the reason this particular neighbor came to America was to avoid similar intimidation and coercion he once experienced in Russia. WITNESS X can be reached @ 408-247-3774 + B) WITNESS Z -- Another witness who recently came forward with new information about the harassment John experienced is a person who lives down the street from John. At least two cats that belonged to this witness were returned dead and "crushed"; not run over but instead "crushed" as the witness said; just as Precious was apparently crushed to death. This witness also overheard many of the loud night time harassment attacks aimed at John. WITNESS Z can be reached @ 408-839-4178. 

QUESTION: If this witness heard the various loud noises from the harassment and stalking; why did the Rebholtz family not hear it as well; as the Rebholtz family lives almost the exact same distance away from John as Witness Z; and/or for that matter The Paolinetti residence; which is no more than roughly 50 yards from the residence of WITNESS Z?

SEE: REST IN PEACE PRECIOUS @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/rest-in-peace-precious.html

2) NEIGHBORHOOD EXODUS -- During the many years of this said harassment and stalking directed towards John; 4 long time neighbors and 2 short term renter neighbors who lived right across the street from John moved out of the neighborhood to get away from this situation. Adding to this; the very first day one neighbor moved in across the street from John; this event (CR #12-573 -- Officer Winkleman) occurred the very same night. Welcome to the neighborhood? These same neighbors are not very happy about this situation being covered up for so long; which gave them a false impression of the safety of the neighborhood they had just moved into. When someone spends almost $1 million dollars of their hard-earned money on a house; they should know the facts regarding public safety (and/or lack thereof) in the neighborhood they are moving into > (SEE: CR #12-573 -- Officer Winkleman) > GO TO:  http://likroper.com/21JAN2012A.wmv

SEE ALSO: MISTER ROGERS AND PRISON YARD BEHAVIOR @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/mister-rogers-and-prison-yard-behavior.html

INCIDENT ON 15 DECEMBER 2013 -- EV 133490020

On 15 December 2013 at around 2 am (the surveillance footage is roughly one hour ahead due to the recent time change) John called the Sunnyvale 911 emergency phone line after hearing his doorbell ring; then hung it up to call the non-emergency line instead. The 911 operator called John back; so John then stepped outside as he talked to a 911 operator. But as John got down the street the wireless signal to his land line phone weakened and cut off in the middle of the conversation. John then called back and asked for assistance again; and this time the second operator told John that an officer would eventually arrive; but the officer never arrived. John then downloaded the relatively short surveillance segment showing the incident. The video of the incident in question can be viewed @ http://likroper.com/15DEC2013_25512AM.wmv 

> SEE ALSO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x36zGEZguo

NOTE: John eventually called back the Sunnyvale police non-emergency line after 5 am and got an incident event number from a very courteous phone clerk. (EV 133490020). This seemingly innocuous incident is just a continuation of a multi-year harassment campaign that has been directed at John by members of the Rebholtz family as well as several of their friends (a party was going on at the time at the Rebholtz residence located at 1147 Doon Court in Sunnyvale. It is not known whether Mr. and Mrs. Rebholtz were home at the time of the incident). Adding to this; the Sunnyvale police department continues to be negligent and in dereliction of duty (as usual) when it comes to finally ending this illegal targeted stalking and harassment of John.

THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA + 1333 LAWRENCE EXPRESSWAY + THE MARINA PLAYA APARTMENTS ETC = LAX ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ETC

DOUBLE CRESTED CORMORANT @ MARINA PLAYA APARTMENTS IN SANTA CLARA -- 24 APRIL 2009 (SEE PHOTO ABOVE) > go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-crested_Cormorant > THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA CLAIMED THIS ILLEGALLY DISPLACED DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANT WAS A COMMON HERON AT A CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON OCTOBER 8TH 1999; AND ALSO LIED ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE 1333 POND WHICH USED TO BE THE OLD CALABAZAS CREEK -- AS ONE PARTICULARLY LARGE STORM DURING THE 1950S CAUSED THE OLD CREEK TO BE RE-ROUTED. THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA CLAIMED THE POND WAS ARTIFICIAL WHEN THEY CLEARLY KNEW IT WAS NOT. ANONYMOUS CITY WORKERS LATER TOLD JOHN THEY AND OTHERS WHO WORKED FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA KNEW THE POND AT 1333 LAWRENCE EXPRESSWAY WAS A NATURAL POND.

DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS @ MARINA PLAYA APARTMENTS -- 29 JANUARY 2013

A construction worker who worked on the initial 1333 Lawrence Expressway development told John one day that he in fact overheard talk about how the initial buildings constructed at 1333 Lawrence Expressway were just "show for investors" (SEE PHOTO A below -- this is the first incarnation of the illegally developed 1333 Lawrence Expressway. These buildings and this parking lot were later razed and replaced with high density housing) And this same construction worker also told John that he was actually a bird watcher who used to watch the endangered bird at the old 1333 Lawrence Expressway pond!?! (The construction worker said the bird was an endangered "Blue Herring"; not a Double-Crested Cormorant) Leading us directly to: the City of Santa Clara has been breaking the law and lying to the public at large for many years now. NOTE: An ancient one hundred foot plus tall tree with a roughly 20 foot wide trunk was also removed from the 1333 Lawrence Expressway property sometime during the year 2000.

For instance; at one particular Santa Clara City Council meeting during the 1990s; John brought to the attention of the public the corporate and/or government-sanctioned destruction of some of the last remaining wildlife habitat surrounding Mission College in Santa Clara (Burrowing Owls; Ground Squirrels; Jack Rabbits etc -- John used to deliver BAM Magazine to Mission College and noticed the shored-up wildlife habitat around the school. John then called the office of the President of Mission College and inquired about the habitat; and apparently someone from the college had previously brought attention to the habitat; causing it to receive greater protection -- SEE PHOTO B below). 

John later heard his appearance at that particular Santa Clara City Council meeting made it on the local TV news; and someone got fined $$$ for this irresponsible environmental destruction. The Santa Clara City Council also later destroyed all evidence of City Council meetings attended by John and many others as well!?!

THEREFORE; if anyone is seeking a motive as to why John has been allowed to be treated so badly; and/or why John has had his civil rights so egregiously violated in the last few years by members of the Santa Clara police department and others closely connected to them; it likely all stems back to these initial events during the 1990s -- as there is a very close connection between the way animals are treated; and the way humans are treated.

"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated." - Mahatma Gandhi

PHOTO A

PHOTO B