Saturday, July 27, 2013

CHIEF CIA ASSET REVEALS 911 TRUTHS

"I was the chief CIA asset covering Iraq and Libya at the United Nations from 1995 to 2003. I gave advanced warning about 9/11 and there was a peace option on the table with Iraq that the United States wanted to suppress. 30 days after I requested to testify on Capitol Hill, I went to congress and requested to testify through proper channels. I woke to hear the FBI pounding on my door with an arrest warrant on the Patriot Act." > go to: http://youtu.be/GnCIVeX0Ukc

Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989: The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report agency misconduct. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take (or threaten to take) retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant. Whistleblowers may file complaints that they believe reasonably evidences a violation of a law, rule or regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety > go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_Protection_Act#Whistleblower_Protection_Act_of_1989

§ 1986. ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT ~ Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; etc > See: Federal Civil Rights Statutes @ http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sup_01_42_10_21_20_I.html > SEE ALSO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/fbi-plot-to-assassinate-occupy-leaders.html 

Thursday, July 25, 2013

ASSAULT BLOG: JUNE 2007

This blog shows that as far back as June of 2007 the City of Santa Clara knew ALL ABOUT attacks John was experiencing. This particular blog is comprised of excerpts from several entries John made to his web site and blogs etc; and this particular link was part of an evidence package given to Judge Louis Amadeo, Junior at an administrative hearing on Thursday, September 6th, 2007 > go to: http://attack-evidence.blogspot.com/2007_06_01_archive.html

THE FBI: ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT?

OVER THE COURSE OF A FEW YEARS; John made SEVERAL attempts to get the FBI to respond to the public corruption John was experiencing; with NO ACTION taken on the part of the FBI > go to: ALBERT MARTINEZ AND HIS SON IN LAW @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/albert-martinez-and-his-son-in-law.html + HOW LOW CAN THEY GO @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/08/how-low-can-they-go.html + ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/action-for-neglect-to-prevent.html

 NOTE:  ACCORDING TO ACLU DOCUMENTS; SHORTLY AFTER SEPTEMBER 11TH, 2001 THE FBI ADMITTED TO 25 YEARS OF ACTIVE DESTABILIZATION OF ACTIVISTS; INCLUDING AND/OR MAINLY AFRICAN AMERICAN ACTIVISTS -- THIS DIRTY LITTLE SECRET WAS MADE INTO LAW WITH THE USA PATRIOT ACT; LEGISLATION THAT WAS MYSTERIOUSLY DRAFTED JUST WEEKS BEFORE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001...

INSTITUTIONALIZED GENDER DISCRIMINATION Pt. II


There are many wonderful ladies in this world; but then there is the other side...in many instances; more often than not at least some women do not expect men to be treated the same way they are treated. (while some women want 'equality'; all most women talk about is financial equality; but REAL equality will only be accomplished when women DEMAND that men are treated the exact same way that women are. Until then we can expect more of the same).

The most glaring example of institutionalized gender discrimination John encountered is this:  
1) FEDERAL X OFFICER GABBY SEAGRAVE -- John initially encountered Officer Seagrave after John had called the City of Santa Clara about a neighbor named Mister Olenak (Mister Olenak was seen putting bleach into food for designated animals -- a video of this is available). Officer Seagrave declined to take action about criminal threats Mister Olenak had made towards John; causing Mister Olenak to be emboldened by this negligence on Officer Seagraves' part and carry through on his criminal threats made against John (go to: http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/06/mister-olenaks-admission-of-guilt.html

Adding to this; the morning Mister Olenak carried through with his threats against John; OFFICER SEAGRAVE WAS ON THE SCENE AND TOOK NO ACTION TO ARREST MISTER OLENAK; even as John called an FBI complaint hotline. Then later at an administrative hearing (go to: http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/10/are-you-being-delphied.html -- In other words; a sham trial closed to the public) Mister Olenak admitted to his attack again; BUT THIS TIME IN FRONT OF SEVERAL WITNESSES INCLUDING: JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO JUNIOR; OFFICER PABLO LOPEZ; and OFFICER GABBY SEAGRAVE; among about 4-5 other people. John was then fined for feeding ducks WHILE NO ACTION WAS TAKEN TO PUNISH MISTER OLENAK; WHO HAD VIOLENTLY ATTACKED JOHN. 

NOTE: AFTER THIS QUESTIONABLE INCIDENT; OFFICER SEAGRAVE WAS THEN PROMOTED TO WORK IN THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT OF ALL THINGS!?!

2) MRS. OLENAK witnessed Mister Olenak while he was attacking John; yet Mrs. Olenak did nothing about it; and even went into court to pretend duck feeding was the real issue and not the various Civil Rights violations that had occurred.

3) SHANNON HERNANDEZ, JOHANNA CLINKENBEARD ETC -- The second most glaring example of institutionalized gender discrimination John has experienced happened at local nightclubs; involving bartender Shannon Hernandez and bartender "Ang" of the Oasis Nightclub; and Johanna Clinkenbeard of  Woodhams Lounge. All three of these female bartenders knew of the attacks against John, yet took no action to help John. Ang went even as far as trying to dissuade a witness when John called the Sunnyvale Police department about it; by ordering John to leave the club after finding out John had called the police (and this can be heard on the recorded call to the Sunnyvale non-emergency number). 

John was then EJECTED from both clubs after being attacked!?! Sunnyvale Officers Smith and Ochoa declined to pull up surveillance footage at the Oasis Nightclub; while Officers from the San Jose Police Department promised to pull up the surveillance footage at Woodhams Lounge. This is not only even more evidence of a clear pattern of negligence on the part of the Sunnyvale Police; but also an obvious discriminatory pattern when it comes to females dealing with violence against men. 

4) FEMALE POLITICIANS IN GENERAL -- John recently called the office of United States Senator Barbara Boxer to demand the "Violence Against Women Act" include men as well; yet NO ACTION was taken by Senator Boxer to protect males in the process. This shows all too clearly that institutionalized gender discrimination exists at the federal level; therefore until legislation is passed to protect all people as opposed to some; Civil Rights violations like what happened to males like John and/or Trayvon Martin etc etc etc will likely continue to happen. Why is it that female politicians think they were elected only to protect females?

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

INSTITUTIONALIZED GENDER DISCRIMINATION

INSTITUTIONALIZED GENDER DISCRIMINATION is something that starts at the top; as the U.S. Congress has recently passed the "Violence Against Women Act"; while not equally protecting men in the process > YOU CAN SUPPORT THE 'END VIOLENCE AGAINST PEOPLE' ACT @ http://www.causes.com/causes/794162-support-the-end-violence-against-people-act + http://www.thepetitionsite.com/635/583/361/the-end-violence-against-people-act/

FOR INSTANCE: If what John has experienced over time happened to a teenage girl and/or an adult woman who was targeted for stalking and harassment and also attacked over a dozen times (go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRVG-rWpemk&feature=c4-overview&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug) SOMEONE WOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED BY NOW. And what this really exposes is not only institutionalized gender discrimination in the obvious difference between the way the sexes are treated (is this equality?); but also race and age discrimination as well. It all amounts to fundamental discrimination on a variety of levels.

It is race-based because Caucasians can still legally be hated with no legal repercussions; gender-based because if John was a woman someone would have been arrested for the various attacks by now (and the woman would be celebrated for FINALLY defending herself instead of being demonized -- while in other countries; that same woman could be punished for doing the EXACT same thing...as men like John apparently are here in America); and age-based because our youth obsessed culture is more likely to protect (for example) a teen over a 50 year old single male like John (by the way; John is only 5 years away from being eligible for the Dennys' senior menu).

see also: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/equal-justice-under-law.html

EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW? Pt II



REVERSE DISCRIMINATION exists on a silent level; as actions speak louder than words. Therefore; a person does not necessarily have to say anything overt to make their reverse racist intent clear; they only need to do something (or simply not do something when they should). Therefore; it is often quite easy to guess the racial intent of any given individual simply based upon their actions. And this is largely due to the fact that Caucasians have long enjoyed legal protections Minority groups severely lacked; so to compensate (more like overcompensate) government has increased protections for Minorities; while weakening protections for Caucasians. Caucasians seem to be the last race of human on Earth who can be freely attacked with no legal repercussions. Is this equal justice under law? Is this what MLK dreamed about? I think not. > see also:  http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/equal-justice-under-law.html

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

FBI PLOT TO ASSASSINATE OCCUPY LEADERS

SOURCE: OCCUPY CENTRAL -- July 5, 2013. Houston. "A Texas plot to assassinate leaders from the Occupy Wall Street movement hasn’t even merited a mention on the nightly news. But details are slowly leaking out about the illegal program showing that the FBI isn’t just aware of the campaign to murder US political leaders, they may actually be sheltering and funding it. What the information reveals is a private army of corporate paramilitary death squads making their illegal and homicidal services available to US officials: political murders on US soil, against US political leaders." > http://www.whiteoutpress.com/articles/q32013/plot-to-assassinate-occupy-leaders-exposed-further/