On Thursday september 6th, 2007 an administrative hearing was held at the City of Santa Clara. At this particular administrative hearing; MISTER OLENAK ADMITTED TO ATTACKING JOHN IN FRONT OF EVERYONE AT THE HEARING; INCLUDING LOUIS AMADEO JUNIOR, AND SANTA CLARA POLICE OFFICERS PABLO LOPEZ AND GABRIELLE SEAGRAVE (see links below); and no action was taken to correct the situation. THEREFORE; any judge assigned to this case was likely hired for the way he or she thinks; meaning many case outcomes will be pre-determined.
This poses a REAL problem for equal justice; as Judge Amadeo is being paid by the CIty of Santa Clara; therefore if a decision he makes goes against Santa Clara; Judge Amadeo will likely end up being retaliated against by being terminated from his position later on for seemingly unconnected reasons.
Many judges act much like CEOs who watch the finances of government; and sometimes even if egregious acts have been committed; these judges have a vested interest in making decisions favorable to the city that employs them. So therein lies the main problem; a conflict of interest.
Therefore; regardless of the initial outcome of Johns' claim file to the City of Sunnyvale; the case will be appealed to a higher authority which stands apart from the obvious collusion that exists here in the Santa Clara valley between government; and the judges they appoint and/or hire.
Therefore; regardless of the initial outcome of Johns' claim file to the City of Sunnyvale; the case will be appealed to a higher authority which stands apart from the obvious collusion that exists here in the Santa Clara valley between government; and the judges they appoint and/or hire.
SEE: MISTER OLENAKS' ADMISSION OF GUILT @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/06/mister-olenaks-admission-of-guilt.html
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
ARE YOU BEING DELPHIED? @
Sunday, August 19, 2007
THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT - THE FBI PUBLIC CORRUPTION HOTLINE - THE NIGHT SUPERVISOR AND THE GANG OF PUNKS @
BY THE WAY: it clearly does not matter if judge judy says that this kind of thing "happens all the time"; or that "it is not her problem" -- judge judy OBVIOUSLY has a HUGE pre-civil rights-era problem i cannot help her with...
ReplyDelete