OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF EVENTS AND/OR ILLEGALLY SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE BY THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT IN JUNE 2010 AND/OR THE SUNNYVALE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN JUNE 2011

SEE ALSO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/gang-stalking.html

THE ABOVE FLIER WAS FIRST DISTRIBUTED BY JOHN WITHIN HIS NEIGHBORHOOD IN JUNE 2010; THEN LATER SUBMITTED BY THE REBHOLTZ FAMILY AND PLACED FILE AT THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT (see police stamp on document: T11CH 003694); PROVING THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT HAD PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF JOHNS' SITUATION UP TO ONE YEAR BEFORE THE JUNE 2011 EVENT > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHoPZYXSmXU

Since John is one of the main activists in his neighborhood; John distributed flyers like the one seen above all over his neighborhood trying to bring an end to the illegal siege he was experiencing at his residence. After experiencing many years of harassment and stalking by the sons (and friends) of Santa Clara Police officer Don Paolinetti; John quickly drafted the above document to distribute around his neighborhood after one particularly sloppy night time attack (around 10 pm) by Jake Paolinetti and the older of the two Rebholtzs' sons; as well as at least one other person who was driving the large white SUV/truck type vehicle used in this particular incident. (This event was also witnessed by John ex-neighbor Steve Henson and his son).

The Santa Clara police department not only took no action to bring an end to the illegal activity; but they also retaliated against John by attempted to criminalize John for bringing this situation to the publics' attention. This proves the Santa Clara police department -- as well as the Rebholtz family -- was complicit in covering up this situation roughly one year before it got out of hand in June of 2011.

NOTE: Jake Paolinetti is clearly NOT entitled to the qualified immunity available to government officials; as the legal principle to bar Jakes' illegal and threatening conduct is clearly pre-established. Also; no court has ever recognized a First Amendment right for ANY citizen to be free from retaliatory non-arrest with probable cause; nor was such a right otherwise clearly established at the time of Jakes' non-arrest. And while it has been pre-established that government officials may not be sued under the First Amendment for retaliatory prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue prosecution; the question remains whether government officials CAN be sued under the First Amendment for retaliatory non-prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue prosecution > GO TO: 25 JUN 2011: JAKE PAOLINETTI: CRIMINAL THREATS; TARGETED STALKING; HATE CRIMES; GANG ENHANCEMENTS; ETC @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdSSSANDXlE&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug&index=10&feature=plcp

QUESTIONS: Why did the Reboholtz family go out of their jurisdiction to the City of Santa Clara to to report this supposed "crime"? Why did they avoid bringing this to the attention of the Sunnyvale police department? It should be obvious the Rebholtz family used their questionable connections with Santa Clara officer Don Paolinetti to pull strings and/or distract from the FACT that Jake Paolinetti and friends were involved in a multi-year seige targeting John at his residence. Therefore; John wants to thank both the Rebholtz family; and the Paolinetti family as well for being stupid enough to include this document as part of their "evidence of harassment".

RELATED STORY: http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/11/27/san-jose-police-officer-accused-of-writing-phony-traffic-citations/