STATE LAW CROSSWALK SIGN NEEDED ON DUNFORD WAY @ THUNDERBIRD AVENUE IN SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA (CONTINUED)...

GO TO: http://likroper.com/DUCKS.wmv

 

Reacting to naturally occurring planetary electromagnetism; ducks return to Johns' neighborhood every spring within 4-5 days of the new moon of February and/or March (depending upon weather conditions > see: Groundhog Day). The video and/or photo seen above shows neighborhood ducks using the crosswalk while crossing Dunford Way. Therefore; a state law crosswalk sign is needed at the intersection of Dunford Way @ Thunderbird Avenue A.S.A.P. to make this intersection safer for all who use it; human and/or animal. > SEE ALSO: STATE LAW CROSSWALK SIGN NEEDED ON DUNFORD WAY IN SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/04/state-law-crosswalk-sign-needed-on.html

LEMONS TO LEMONADE

SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA -- While it looks like John was having a good time in this photo; this was actually a low point where John almost did not go out -- as Johns' teeth were so badly infected from losing multiple nights of sleep due to the egregious stalking and harassment he was experiencing at the time.

It all started one night at the Oasis Nightclub when one of Johns' old friend recorded Jon singing KC and the Sunshine bands' "Get down tonight". John had essentially been singing the same 6 or so songs for many years at the time; so John started recording his own karaoke performances and putting them up on You Tube. This was also around the same time John was being harassed and stalked nearly to death by various people who lived in his neighborhood. 

The constant night time disturbances got so unbearable that John ultimately had to leave his house on Friday and Saturday nights just to avoid it. John initially drank moderate amounts of alcohol once per week on the weekends for karaoke; then split a beer with his Dad sometime in the middle of the week -- but after the extended stalking campaign John experienced; John ended up drinking alcohol both Friday and Saturday nights -- and eventually every day at one point in time. 

John then visited a dentist who told John that an infection in his teeth had gotten so bad that it could burst into Johns' brain and kill him. John had lost so much sleep during this extended and egregious harassment/stalking campaign that the infection festered to a dangerous point. John then stopped singing and drinking alcohol for about 7 months after the infected teeth were removed; and then returned to sing karaoke again at the Oasis Nightclub.

Sometime later after karaoke host Doug Ward  attacked John in front of the Oasis Nightclub and had John ejected from the Oasis Nightclub (go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/03/oasis-nightclub-karaoke-host-doug-ward.html > with the help of Sunnyvale D.P.S. Officers Smith and Ochoa > go to: https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/11/posdps-officers-smith-and-ochoa-illegal.html) John first went to Woodhams Lounge  to continue singing karaoke; but was eventually attacked in a similar fashion once again (?!?); causing John to call the S.J.P.D. before being ejected from Woodhams Lounge as well!?! (Note: John was essentially ejected from Woodhams Lounge for calling the police about the attack; then eventually retaliated against by the bartender/owner!?! > go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/woodhams-bartender-retaliation.html). 

John eventually stopped singing altogether for about one year after the death of his good friend Jimmy Finley; which happened around the same time that John was ejected from Woodhams Lounge (go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/illegal-use-of-united-states-military.html). John then taught himself how to play bass; starting the recording of about 50 hair-raising protest songs that are now in the pre-production phase of development. (No Justice; No Peace; Son of a Cop etc etc etc).

What is the main point if this blog post? John knew the whole time that the loads of stinky bullshit  being piled on top of his head (by rogue elements of the United States government etc > go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-usa-bullshit-act.html) was going to be consequential; therefore John proceeded to sing and record about 250 songs to get him ready for eventually singing in a band as revenge. In other words; John knew the whole time that he was making lemonade from the lemons he was being served up.

  

RAINY DAY WOMEN #12 & 35 (DYLAN)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIjX59QBEJg

It all started out quite innocently...
 

SPILL THE WINE (WAR)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q5IXVDACvs

Almost 69,000 You Tube hits on this song!
 

SUNSHINE OF YOUR LOVE (CREAM)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLC9fUEHlPU

An absolute karaoke monster!
 

THE ONE I LOVE (REM)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzvRaW4ep5o 

The last song John posted before succumbing to his teeth infection; causing John to stop drinking alcohol for about 7 months (March thru October 2010) and heal up...
 

RAINY DAY WOMEN #12 & 35 (BOB DYLAN)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yw3PAQy0VY

The first song John sang out of the gates after his infection healed. 

*Almost 5,000 You Tube hits!

GO TO: https://www.youtube.com/LIKROPER + FACEBOOK PRIVACY; MARK ZUCKERBERG AND THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/07/facebook-privacy-and-mark-zuckerberg-etc.html

INSTALL REMOTELY-MONITORED CCTV IN ALL U.S. PRISONS AND/OR POLICE DEPARTMENTS ETC!

 

John recently spoke to an anonymous individual who was arrested by the Santa Clara Police Department (and/or S.C.P.D.) for allegedly being drunk in public within the past few months. After this said individual was transported to the S.C.P.D. jail for holding; he was then attacked by a fellow inmate. While attempting to restrain this attacker; an S.C.P.D. Officer entered the jail cell and proceeded to throw this same anonymous individual to the ground in an attempt to restrain him. 

Using excessive force; the Officer then allegedly folded the anonymous individuals' arms and legs in back of him; then stepped down and crushed the anonymous individuals' entire body to the ground using his foot; causing what appears to be permanent injury to the anonymous individuals' thumb. (Hospital records of the injuries are available; photos of the injuries were also taken and onsite surveillance footage is available). But! the anonymous individual has apparently been coerced and/or intimidated by his violent encounter with the S.C.P.D. and is therefore afraid to follow up on it. 

This particular questionable incident then caused John to think of a new idea mandating remote third-party federal monitoring of all incarcerated individuals; so John then created a new petition to help bring about this much needed change. (note: This incident also shows a pattern of unchecked excessive force and/or violent behavior on the part of the S.C.P.D. > SEE ALSO: REST IN PEACE, BRIAN COLLETTI @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/04/rest-in-peace-brian-colletti.html)

The language states as follows: "WE THE UNDERSIGNED believe all incarcerated individuals in the United States should receive increased protections with the installation of remotely-monitored CCTV distributed to distant locations and/or stored in secure remote computer servers for safe storage and/or oversight by the federal government..." > GO TO: INSTALL REMOTELY-MONITORED CCTV IN ALL U.S. PRISONS AND/OR POLICE DEPARTMENTS ETC! @ http://www.thepetitionsite.com/305/014/756/install-remotely-monitored-cctv-in-all-us-prisons-andor-police-departments/

NOTE: The above petition was inspired by a previous wildly successful petition (11,000+ signatures gathered so far) created by John similarly stating: "WE THE UNDERSIGNED respectfully ask the President to draft and sign and executive order mandating all animal processing facilities (slaughterhouses etc) in the United States to have 24-hour surveillance monitoring cameras operated and monitored by the U.S.D.A. to save time and money and improve general animal welfare by allowing mass remote surveillance of multiple facilities from distant locations..." 

> GO TO: EXECUTIVE ORDER FOR SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS IN ANIMAL PROCESSING FACILITIES! @ http://www.thepetitionsite.com/765/097/806/executive-order-for-surveillance-cameras-in-animal-processing-facilities/

"It can only be attributable to human error..." -- HAL 9000 

THE U.S.A. BULLSHIT ACT

 "ONE BIG OLD PILE OF STINKY TEXAS BULLSHIT..."

"Police state harshness today reflects US policy. Compromised civil liberties expanded government surveillance, eroded habeas rights, formalized military tribunals, permitted torture-extracted confessions, and sanctified violence in the name of national security. Thousands of political prisoners languish in America's gulag. It's the world's largest by far. It's one of the harshest. Many there deserve praise, not imprisonment. OWS activists may join them. More on that below. 

For the first time, U.S.A. Patriot Act provisions created the crime of domestic terrorism. Section 802 applies to persons alleged to engage in acts "dangerous to human life." Evidence isn't needed. Accusations suffice. US citizens and permanent residents are vulnerable. They're frequent targets. They're unjustly accused of violating federal, state, or local laws if they:

1) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; 2) influence government policy by intimidation or coercion; and/or 3) affect government conduct by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.

Patriot Act legislation enacted sweeping federal powers. They're used to investigate and prosecute alleged terrorism. Civil libertarians, environmental and animal rights activists are targeted. Peaceful demonstrations are criminalized. At times, long-term incarceration follows.

In 2001, prominent Americans demonstrated on Vieques Island, Puerto Rico. Civil disobedience actions were included. Activists entered a US airbase. They harmed no one. They protested against Pentagon exercises which included bombings. This type of activism is called domestic terrorism if done to influence government policy. 

*Patriot legislation's Section 806 lets authorities confiscate or freeze foreign and domestic assets. No hearing or notice is required. Individuals, organizations, and other entities are vulnerable. Prosecutors can say they engaged in planning, supporting, concealing, or perpetrating any anti-American act of domestic or international terrorism. Evidence isn't required. Guilt by accusation follows. Victims are some of America's best. They're targeted for their political beliefs. Putting their bodies on the line for justice harms them. Wide-sweeping, vague legislative language perversely permits calling constitutionally protected acts terrorism..."

READ MORE @ http://rense.com/general95/ows-terrorists.html

NOTE: John strongly suspects that his once-legally protected activist involvement in the saving of the Peterson field etc led to John being secretly added to this bogus new federal list of "activist/terrorists" by corrupt government personnel desperately wanting to control John. 

BUT! The official United States government dialogue regarding the 911 attacks is rapidly unraveling. The problem is; the supposed "terrorist attacks" of September 11th 2001 were actually an extensively premeditated inside job attack by rogue elements of the United States government; with help from foreign interests as well. IN FACT; right after the 911 attacks occurred; the F.B.I. finally admitted to their dirty little secret of pre-911 involvement in roughly 25 years of actively destabilizing activists -- and especially Black activists like M.L.K. etc. (Note: the USA Patriot Act -- drafted in the weeks prior to the 911 attacks -- made the F.B.I.'s dirty little secret into law. Source: A.C.L.U.). 

IN RETROSPECT; the U.S.A. Bullshit Act (and/or U.S.A. Patriot Act) essentially hijacked the civil rights movement and many of its' laws; then used them for government advantage -- leaving the people who fund their multifarious follies largely unprotected once again. In other words; taxpayers who ultimately run this show have been handed the same big old stinking pile of bullshit the civil rights movement tried to flush down their evil governmental toilets. Regardless; civilization largely relies on civility from all involved to ultimately be successful.

Therefore; if John has been somehow added to this bogus government list of (particularly successful) activists; then that same government needs to stop playing games with Johns' life and REMOVE JOHN FROM THE LIST IMMEDIATELY -- A.S.A.P.! NO MORE U.S.A. BULLSHIT! JOHN REFUSES TO STAY SILENT UNTIL UNALIENABLE CONSTITUTIONAL ETC RIGHTS ARE FULLY RESTORED AND PROTECTED FOR ALL ONCE AGAIN! 

 SEE: UNALIENABLE RIGHTS @

http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/02/unalienable-rights.html

This could explain why NO ACTION has been taken to help John for almost a decade since his wildly successful involvement with saving the Peterson field etc from development; and also explains Johns' false "extraordinary rendition" kidnap/arrest by corrupt Santa Clara Officer Pablo Lopez...FOR FEEDING DUCKS!?! > go to: FAHRENHEIT 911 FULL MOVIE IN HD ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/12/fahrenheit-911-full-movie-in-hd.html + WTC 9/11 Building 7 - CLEARLY DETONATED! 2013 NEW FOOTAGE OF EXPLOSIONS! @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXrT6h2oepc + ILLEGAL USE OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY AGAINST UNARMED UNITED STATES CITIZENS? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/illegal-use-of-united-states-military.html 

SEE ALSO: "A pair of Oakland animal-rights activists were arrested on federal terrorism charges Friday for allegedly driving more than 40,000 miles across the country to save the hides of 5,000 mink destined to become furs, authorities said. Joseph Buddenberg, 31, and Nicole Kissane, 28, were both charged with conspiracy to violate the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act during a nationwide vandalism spree that crisscrossed the country in the summer of 2013, said U.S. Attorney Laura Duffy. 

The pair allegedly traveled as far as the East Coast — stopping along the way at fur farms in Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Montana and Pennsylvania — freeing mink from cages and in one case a bobcat while also committing various acts of vandalism against businesses, business owners and employees in the fur industry, according to court records. 

“Whatever your feelings about the fur industry, there are legal ways to make your opinions known,” Duffy said in a statement. “The conduct alleged here, sneaking around at night, stealing property and vandalizing homes and businesses with acid, glue and chemicals, is a form of domestic terrorism and can’t be permitted to continue...” 

QUESTIONS: If "sneaking around at night, stealing property and vandalizing homes and businesses" are considered to be acts of domestic terrorism"; then why were and/or are the actions of Jake Paolinetti and friends (etc) NOT considered to be acts of domestic terrorism and/or conspiratorial? And why was it 'OK' for the Cities of Santa Clara and/or Sunnyvale to stand by idly in a grossly negligent fashion as John was being domestically terrorized for nearly a decade of his life; leading to loss of his savings and destruction of his good credit record of nearly two decades?

And why is war NOT considered to be an act of domestic terrorism; and especially when foreign peoples are sometimes shot the way wolves shouldn't even be shot (because once again; those who harm animals often have a tendency to harm humans) from United States Army AH-64 Apache helicopters? And how could it be considered to be "OK" for the United States to involve itself in the terrorism of war; while actively pursuing terrorists?!? (see: fox watching the hen house) > go to: July 12, 2007 BAGHDAD AIRSTRIKE @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_12,_2007_Baghdad_airstrike

Adding to this; during many of the domestic terror attacks occurring at Johns' residence; there were animals present (ducks; cats etc) at John residence. But since John was NOT involved in killing animals for profit; John apparently does not receive the same strong protections as those who DO harm animals for profit (see: discrimination; animal cruelty; acute cranial/posterior syndrome and/or extreme stupidity etc etc etc). But since those who harm animals are also known to also harm humans; WHY WAS THIS KIND OF BAD BEHAVIOR ALLOWED TO OCCUR AT JOHNS' RESIDENCE FOR SO LONG?

GO TO:OAKLAND PAIR INDICTED ON TERRORISM CHARGES  @ http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Oakland-duo-indicted-on-terrorism-charges-for-6404493.php + THE REVOLVING DOOR OF STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv + MISTER OLENAK AND DANNY OLENAK @  http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/02/mister-olenak-andor-danny-olenak.html

 
OTHER QUESTIONS: Whether or not the tragic events of September 11th, 2001 occurred the way the "official dialogue" states (and/or regardless of exactly WHO was behind the events of this fateful day) the question remains WHY would the United States government use such a tragedy to punish it's own citizens by nullifying their Constitutional rights for something those citizens had absolutely nothing to do with? > SEE ALSO: WIKILEAKS PROVES 911 WAS INSIDE JOB! @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdkXnOGhBp8 + https://911.wikileaks.org/

THE SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENT A.I.D.S. VERSUS FORCED MASS VACCINATIONS ETC

While this Addendum Blog post does not necessarily involve Johns' case; a recently surfaced document seems to suggest that the development of the A.I.D.S. virus was funded through funds obtained by the United States Department of Defense (DoD), which requested and received $10 million via House bill HB 15090 - reviewed in hearings before the subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations at the House of Representatives' first session of the ninety-first Congress in 1970, part five of HB 15090 was entitled research, development, test and evaluation, and was apparently sponsored by the Department of the Army, the advanced research project agency (now D.A.R.P.A.) and defense research and engineering.

The feasibility program and laboratories were to have been completed by 1974-1975 and the virus between 1974-1979. The World Health Organization (who) started to inject A.I.D.S.-laced smallpox vaccine into over 100 million Africans in 1977, and over 2000 young white male homosexuals (Operation Trojan Horse) were allegedly injected with laced hepatitus vaccine in 1978 through the Centers for Disease Control and the New York Blood Center.

The development of the virus apparently had a dual purpose: (1) as a political/ethnic weapon to be used against black individuals and (2) one of the programmed efforts at de-population. Some feel HB15090 was the U.S. government's reaction to the civil rights movement, the sexual revolution and/or the 1960's baby boom. These actions may have helped to bring about the U.S. ban on chemical/biological weapons development in 1972. - SEE DOCUMENT + http://likroper.com/aids.jpg 

NOTE: In light of this leaked government document (received from a retired nurse with terminal cancer who worked on A.I.D.S. patients; a document that is clearly in the public interest if valid); planned mass-vaccinations of healthy children and/or potentially adults as well in the future should perhaps be reconsidered until it can be done safely and optionally once again. For the record; if mass vaccinations are later mandated for adults as well; John will not be participating. A government who does this kind of thing once; will likely do it again if given the chance; and once trust is lost in any relationship -- it is often lost for good. And government cannot force its' citizens to trust them. Trust must be earned; the old fashioned way.

RELATED STORIES: Federal courts and the Geneva Convention still acknowledge protection provisions for military personnel, including journalists, however, this “Law of War Manual” details that cutting, stabbing, bombing, exploding and shooting are tolerable means of killing the enemy. However, there is also a clause which states that the use of suffocating gases are prohibited. Outrageously, the manual also contains a section on “unprivileged belligerents,” a new term that replaces “enemy combatant”; journalists based within a designated war zone are encompassed within this term. “In general, journalists are civilians. However, journalists may be members of the armed forces, persons authorized to accompany the armed forces, or unprivileged belligerents,” the “Law of War Manual” declares. Ambiguous terms such as these are meant to provide legal cover; allowing the U.S. military to essentially kill innocent people without facing any legal repercussions. 

GO TO: "UNPRIVILEDGED BELLIGERENTS" OR JOURNALISTS' MURDER ACCEPTABLE IN WAR? @ http://anonhq.com/unprivileged-belligerents-journalists-murder-acceptable-war/ + CDD HELD MEETING OF VACCINE SCIENTISTS TO DELIBERATELY DESTROY EVIDENCE LINKING VACCINES TO AUTISM @ http://www.naturalnews.com/050599_CDC_scientists_scientific_fraud_vaccines_and_autism.html + SEE ALSO: BOMBSHELL: CDC DESTROYED VACCINE DOCUMENTS, CONGRESSMAN REVEALS @ https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/07/31/bombshell-cdc-destroyed-vaccine-documents-congressman-reveals/ + REVEALED: CANCER INDUSTRY PROFITS 'LOCKED IN' BY NAGALESE MOLECULE INJECTED INTO HUMANS VIA VACCINES...SPURS TUMOR GROWTH...EXPLAINS AGGRESSIVE VACCINES PUSH @ http://www.naturalnews.com/050582_nagalase_GcMAF_cancer_industry_profits.html

 
*OTHER ADDENDUM BLOG POSTS NOT NECESSARILY CONNECTED TO JOHNS' CASE BUT STILL WORTH DISCUSSING: APPLE IS PRETENDING TO BE GREEN? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/05/apple-is-pretending-to-be-green.html + FAHRENHEIT 911 FULL MOVIE IN HD ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/12/fahrenheit-911-full-movie-in-hd.html + GEOENGINEERING WATCH @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/03/geoengineering-watch.html

FACEBOOK PRIVACY; MARK ZUCKERBERG AND THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ETC

MARK ZUCKERBERG IS PROTECTED  BY THE PALO ALTO POLICE DEPARTMENT

Many years ago John got the chance to play drums in large arenas with a rock band in the southern United States. During this tour John realized that public figures sometimes have to sacrifice their privacy and are often stalked and harassed by crazed fans who want a piece of the action. This experience left John feeling like his privacy was grossly invaded; causing him to take measures after the tour to protect himself from stalking in the future. 

John was planning on starting a new music project called "Lik Roper" (go to: BEST OF NOISE @ http://likroper.bandcamp.com/album/best-of-noise) and wanted to avoid any further problems that may arise from overly inquisitive fans in case the project was successful in the future.

Adding to this; John writes about many very controversial subjects that could put Johns' safety at risk (go to: http://likroper.com); and John grew up living right next door to "Roger Yim" of the San Francisco Chronicle. Roger uses a false name due to the weight of the dangerous subject matter he writes about to avoid retaliation; so how is John any different than Roger? (the onset of the world wide web and it's consequential decentralization of power has in a very large sense made many people into empowered citizen-journalists needing equal protection).

John also has a friend (a singer who John toured with) who uses a legally copyrighted AKA name similar to the name Lik Roper; and this friend of Johns' has not been forced to use his real name on Facebook. Why is John being discriminated against in this way? Lik Roper has been Johns' legally copyrighted AKA name since 1992; when Mark Zuckerberg was about 8 years old.

John successfully kept his real name private from the general public until recently when Facebook forced John to use it; even though John had been egregiously harassed and stalked and menaced for about a decade prior.  Facebook claims using real names makes their Facebook community "safe"; but John has an extremely rare last name that would make it easy for anyone to find and stalk John and/or his family members if they chose to do so. Adding to this; the use of real names on Facebook also opens up the possibility of identity theft to occur. QUESTION: Should all California residents only be allowed to use fake names on Facebook since the California Constitution mandates it; or should everybody regardless of geographical region be free to enjoy these same protective rights?

Regardless; when Mark Zuckerberg is threatened and/or stalked and/or menaced; the Palo Alto Police Department will quickly protect him from harm (Question: is Mister Zuckerberg considered to be more important than other people who have less money than him? > go to: http://missionlocal.org/2015/07/zuckerbergs-guards-harassed-restraining-order-approved/ + SEE ALSO: EXTRA-LEGAL HARASSMENT @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/07/extra-legal-harassment.html).

Also; Facebook CEO Cheryl Sandberg recently lost her beloved husband. What if a gang of angry conspiratorial teenagers connected to a local police officer (like the ones John had to deal with in the years after his brother died; Don Paolinettis' sons etc) decided to stalk and harass and menace Cheryl Sandberg the same way John was while grieving his brothers' death? That's right; the Palo Alto Police Department would spring into action and arrest the perpetrators and the story would surely be in the local newspapers. Arrests would be made and justice would be done.

So it should seem obvious that Mark Zuckerberg and Cheryl Sandbergs' lives are seen as being more important than others; similar to the way law enforcement views their lives as being more important than the people they were sworn to protect and serve; and/or also very similar to the off-the-charts hubris and/or egotism determined by the Narcissistic Personality Disorder found within many judges and/or government personnel in general.

Adding to this; 1) The California Constitution mandates privacy; and therefore can be interpreted as prohibiting Facebook from forcing people to use their real names; "protecting property; pursuing and/or obtaining safety, happiness AND PRIVACY..." (Note: There is no mention of gross annual income affecting the privacy rights and/or right to safety of individuals) 

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION / ARTICLE 1  DECLARATION OF RIGHTS / SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy. > GO TO: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?waisdocid=0693643808+2+0+0&waisaction=retrieve

SEE ALSO: CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION /ARTICLE 1  DECLARATION OF RIGHTS / SEC. 2.  "(a) Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of this right. A law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or press" (?!?) NOTE: For the record: "every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects" is in direct contradiction with "being responsible for the abuse of this right" (!?!) and/or "a law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or press" (?!?) Who is responsible for writing this two-sided 'whatever way the wind blows' crap? Californians are either free to speak; or they are not.

UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

QUESTION: WHY WAS PALO ALTO RESIDENT JAMES PATRICK FINLEY -- WHO IS AND/OR WAS ONE OF THE GREATEST GUITAR PLAYERS WHO EVER LIVED (GUITAR PLAYER MAGAZINE PUBLISHER DON MENN ATTENDED JIMS' FUNERAL SERVICE > GO TO: THE BICYCLE THIEF @ http://likroper.bandcamp.com/track/the-bicycle-thief) THROWN IN JAIL FOR A BROKEN BIKE LIGHT WHEN HE WAS SUFFERING FROM KIDNEY FAILURE AT THE TIME AND DIED A FEW WEEKS LATER?!? I WOULDN'T EVEN TREAT A DOG LIKE THAT! > GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/illegal-use-of-united-states-military.html

JAMES PATRICK FINLEY WAS NOT PROTECTED BY THE 

PALO ALTO POLICE DEPARTMENT AND HAD AN I.Q. OF 150+

EXTRA-LEGAL HARASSMENT

JULIAN ASSANGE: VICTIM OF EXTRA-LEGAL HARASSMENT

"The maintenance of a free press is necessary for the preservation of a democratic society. Unless the public is made aware of the actions of its government, there is no way for citizens to hold their government accountable. If those in power are simply able to prevent the media from reporting on their bad acts, the public will never know about these abuses, and those in power will never be held accountable. In order to prevent the suppression of the press, the United States has many protections in place for whistle blowers and reporters who reveal misconduct by those who have been elected to serve the best interest of society..." > READ MORE @ http://theprogressivecynic.com/2012/10/26/what-the-persecution-of-assange-and-manning-reveals-about-the-united-states/

Other than Julian Assange; yet another 'good' example of extra-legal harassment is Guancheng, a Chinese human rights activist, self-taught lawyer and target of what is routinely described as "extra-legal harassment" by local Chinese authorities.  After serving years in prison on trumped-up charges, he was "released" to his home - only to find himself imprisoned there by armed thugs, working for the state.  

These thugs not only put him on de-facto house arrest, but they also prevented his free contact with outside parties, attacked his family members, and otherwise made his life miserable - for more than two years.  This spring, he "escaped" (from what was, theoretically, freedom) and has been engaged in high-stakes negotiations to save himself and his family from further state-sponsored, extra-legal harassment. > go to: http://67.225.133.110/~gbpprorg/2600/Extra-Legal_Harrassment.html 

  

And this kind of treatment is very similar to what John experienced over the last decade or so; corrupt cops and their co-conspirators targeting Johns' residence (often in the middle of the night > see links below) in a lame and ultimately unsuccessful attempt to intimidate and/or scare John into submission. Fortunately; at this point the only people frightened into submission are the cowardly idiots who targeted John for so many years.

SEE ALSO: TIMELINE: ACTIVIST TARGETED FOR DISSENT? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/05/timeline-activist-targeted-for-dissent.html + REST IN PEACE MOM AND BROTHER CARL @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/03/rest-in-peace-mom-and-brother-carl.html + THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

Furthermore; civil rights statutes apply to all races and/or classes. The financially prohibitive nature of the justice system in the United States has created a "class-based financial discrimination" which in effect disallows participation by those who cannot afford decent legal representation; therefore violating the civil rights of countless low income individuals in the process. > SEE ALSO: CIVIL RIGHTS: AN OVERVIEW @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/01/civi-rights-overview.html

ADDING INSULT TO INJURY WAY BEYOND BOGUS POLICE CLAIMS OF JOHNS' NONEXISTENT MENTAL ILLNESS; THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ALSO HAD THE GALL TO SEND JOHN A BILL FOR THEIR OFFICIAL NEGLIGENCE -- A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WHO DID NOTHING TO HELP JOHN FOR ALMOST A DECADE; EVEN AFTER CONTACTING THE F.B.I. SEVERAL TIMES!?!

EXTRA-LEGAL TAX HARASSMENT (continued): As John continues his financial free-fall from the many years of police/F.B.I. negligence and/or corruption he has experienced; the I.R.S. and C.F.T.B. continues sending overinflated "class-based financial discrimination" tax notices demanding money John clearly does not owe or have; and this is yet another form of extra-legal harassment and/or civil rights violation that needs to be addressed as well.

JOHNS' FATHER IN TIJUANA, MEXICO

One time many years back Johns' father was visiting Tijuana, Mexico with his wife and wifes' sister from Chicago and their new baby. Johns' father took a wrong turn down a one-way street and ended up parked right in front of a Police station. (?!?) A Police Officer came across the street to talk to Johns' father; speaking to him for about 20 minutes trying to get either money or cigarettes from him. When the Officer finally realized Johns' father had no money or cigarettes; he then gave up and went inside the police station -- and rather than be possibly thrown in jail along with the women and child in the vehicle; Johns' father hastily left the scene and left Mexico soon afterwards.

After hearing this story; it occurred to John that this kind of pay-to-play "protection money" racket exists here in America as well. For instance; if an individual cannot afford a lawyer (for a civil case etc); an individual will likely have little or no help from the government and/or justice system. But if an individual has enough money; they likely can secure decent legal assistance and therefore have a much better chance at a good outcome with their case.

But! this is just another form of pay-to-play with the buck passed down the line to American lawyers instead of Mexican police!?  And unfortunately; this kind of practice violate the civil rights of countless low-income individuals; therefore changes are necessary (monetary restitution etc). 

NOTE: During the reconstruction era, Congress enacted numerous civil rights statutes. Many of these are still in force today and protect individuals from discrimination and from the deprivation of their civil rights. Section 1981 of Title 42 (Equal Rights Under the Law) protects individuals from discrimination based on race in making and enforcing contracts, participating in lawsuits, and giving evidence. See 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Other statutes, derived from acts of the reconstruction era, that protect against discrimination include: Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights (See 42 U.S.C. § 1983); Conspiracies to Interfere With Civil Rights (See 42 U.S.C. § 1985); Conspiracy Against Rights of Citizens (See 18 U.S.C. § 241); Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, (See 18 U.S.C. § 242); The Jurisdictional Statue for Civil Rights Cases (See 28 U.S.C. § 1443); and Peonage Abolished (See 42 U.S.C. § 1994). NOTE: In addition to federal guarantees, state constitutions, statutes and municipal ordinances provide further protection of civil rights. See, e.g., New York's Civil Rights Law. 

READ MORE @ http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/civil_rights + SEE ALSO: CALIFORNIA CIVIL RIGHTS LAW @ http://oag.ca.gov/civil + http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/civilrights/01cr_handbook.pdf?

Civil rights statutes apply to all races and/or classes. The financially prohibitive nature of the justice system in the United States has created a "class-based financial discrimination" which in effect disallows participation by those who cannot afford decent legal representation; therefore violating the civil rights of countless low income individuals in the process. > SEE ALSO: CIVIL RIGHTS: AN OVERVIEW @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/01/civil-rights-overview.html

NOTE: As John continues his financial free-fall from the many years of police negligence and/or corruption he has experienced; the I.R.S. and C.F.T.B. continues sending overinflated "class-based financial discrimination" tax notices demanding money John clearly does not owe or have; and this is yet another form of harassment and/or civil rights violation that needs to be addressed as well. It is also known as "Extra-Legal Harassment.

EXTRA-LEGAL HARASSMENT: Chen Guancheng, is a Chinese human rights activist, self-taught lawyer...and target of what is routinely described as "extra-legal harassment" by local Chinese authorities.  After serving years in prison on trumped-up charges, he was "released" to his home - only to find himself imprisoned there by armed thugs, working for the state.  These thugs not only put him on de-facto house arrest, but they also prevented his free contact with outside parties, attacked his family members, and otherwise made his life miserable - for more than two years.  This spring, he "escaped" (from what was, theoretically, freedom) and has been engaged in high-stakes negotiations to save himself and his family from further state-sponsored, extra-legal harassment. > go to: http://67.225.133.110/~gbpprorg/2600/Extra-Legal_Harrassment.html + see also: TIMELINE: ACTIVIST TARGETED FOR DISSENT? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/05/timeline-activist-targeted-for-dissent.html + REST IN PEACE MOM AND BROTHER CARL @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/03/rest-in-peace-mom-and-brother-carl.html

WHAT JOHNS' NEIGHBOR JANE SAID

John recently gave his neighbor Jane a ride to San Jose International Airport; and on the way to the airport the subject of harassment and stalking and/or night time disturbances came up. Jane apparently has a lady friend who used to live somewhere in San Jose; and this particular lady friend was being continually bothered by a neighbor who not only parked their truck in front of her house on a regular basis; but among many other things also ran power equipment right outside her bedroom window in the middle of the night (@ 2-3 am!?!).

John commented about the San Jose Police Department (S.J.P.D.); suggesting the S.J.P.D. seems like a more aggressive police department than Sunnyvale D.P.S; a police department that would have stopped this egregious abuse of Jane's friend. 

But Jane said that her neighbor eventually was forced to move out of her house due to the continual disturbances and/or lack of S.J.P.D. action. In other words; the S.J.P.D. did NOTHING to stop the harassment of this particular neighbor either; perhaps exposing an ugly pattern of negligent police behavior that spans the entire region; not limited to just the City of Sunnyvale. > READ MORE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/03/friendly-dissuasive-witness-tampering.html

THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OATH OF HONOR

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CALL THE COPS?  > http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/12/this-is-what-happens-whenyou-call-cops.html

Law enforcement is required to take an oath to protect and serve their communities; but they quite often fail to adhere to this oath. Discrimination is at the heart of many of these police indiscretions; even though police are required to protect and serve all people equally. 

"Police officers take risks and suffer inconveniences to protect the lives, defend civil liberties, secure the safety of fellow citizens, and they endure such risks and tolerate such inconveniences on behalf of strangers. Consequently, police work can be one of the more noble and selfless occupations in society when done correctly. Making a difference in the quality of life is an opportunity that policing provides, and few other professions can offer. 

A public affirmation of adhering to an Oath of Honor is a powerful vehicle demonstrating ethical standards. To be successful at enhancing integrity within an organization, leaders must ensure the oath is recited frequently and displayed throughout the organization as well as ensuring ethical mentoring and role modeling are consistent, frequent and visible. The following Law Enforcement Oath of Honor is recommended as by the International Association of Chiefs of Police as symbolic statement of commitment to ethical behavior..."

THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OATH OF HONOR: "On my honor, I will never betray my badge, my integrity, my character, or the public trust. I will always have the courage to hold myself and others accountable for our actions. I will always uphold the constitution my community and the agency I serve..." > Go To:  http://www.theiacp.org/What-is-the-Law-Enforcement-Oath-of-Honor

Before any officer takes the Law Enforcement Oath of Honor, it is important that he/she understands what it means. An oath is a solemn pledge someone makes when he/she sincerely intends to do what he/she says:

HONOR means that one's word is given as a guarantee.
BETRAY is defined as breaking faith with the public trust.
BADGE is the symbol of your office.
INTEGRITY is being the same person in both private and public life.
CHARACTER means the qualities that distinguish an individual. 

PUBLIC TRUST is a charge of duty imposed in faith toward those you serve.
COURAGE is having the strength to withstand unethical pressure, fear or danger.
ACCOUNTABILITY means that you are answerable and responsible to your oath of office.
COMMUNITY is the jurisdiction and citizens served. 

SEE ALSO: VARIOUS QUESTIONABLE COVER UPS BY THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE AND/OR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AND/OR THE SUNNYVALE AND/OR SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENTS ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/07/various-criminal-andor-illegal-cover.html

NOTE: Many law enforcement officers adhere to new unconstitutional laws often created by novice local lawmakers who don't have a clue (and/or don't care) about constitutional policing and/or the true nature of The United States Constitution; (First Amendment [allowing free speech]; Second Amendment [allowing guns] etc. Even the federal government speaks about constitutional policing; right before they attempt to take guns away from people and tell them to shut up. Adding to this; government more often than not sees civil rights laws as applying to government instead of the citizens this important civil law was originally designed to protect. In other words; while police are sworn to protect and serve the general public; current laws actually protect and serve law enforcement more than the general public they were sworn to protect and serve; and this is UNACCEPTABLE.

KRIS DAVY: ATTEMPTED VANDALISM OF SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT / 30 JUN 2015

On 30 jun 2015; Kris Davy sprayed RAID pesticide on the front porch where Johns' cats sit during the day; spraying it near the cats food etc. (Kris has done the exact same thing in the past; and this past incident was reported to Officer Jason Neilsen. > see KRIS DAVY: INCIDENT #EV 15118 237 | VANDALISM + PROPERTY THEFT ETC link below)

Angry that John washed down the porch to remove the dangerous toxins from around the cats; Kris then attempted to vandalize Johns' surveillance system once again; and this time with the garden hose. After an extended and unsuccessful attempt to destroy the camera with water; John saw what she was doing and intervened. Kris is clearly an out-of-control 'pesticidal maniac' who needs to be restrained and punished somehow for her bad deeds.

Question: If RAID pesticide cannot be disposed of in the garbage here in Sunnyvale due to its' toxicity; WHY ARE PEOPLE STILL ALLOWED TO SPREAD IT AROUND THEIR PROPERTIES!? In fact; many modern pesticides are essentially derived from diluted nerve agents developed during WWII in Nazi Germany!?!

NOTE: IG Farben had bought the patent for the pesticide Zyklon B, which had been invented by the Nobel Prize-winning Jewish-German chemist Fritz Haber's research group at the Institute for Physical Chemistry and Elektrochemistry in the 1920s, and which was originally used as an insecticide, especially as a fumigant in grain stores. IG Farben licensed the pesticide to various companies, including the American Cyanamid Company for use, for example, in de-lousing incoming Mexican immigrants in the 1930s, and to the German company Degesch (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Schädlingsbekämpfung), founded by Fritz Haber, and whose products were used in Holocaust gas chambers. IG Farben owned 42.2 percent of the shares of Degesch and was represented in its supervisory board. Pesticides similar to Zyklon B remain in production by other companies, and are used e.g. as insecticides. Go To: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IG_Farben

Adding to this; Kris also unplugged surveillance camera #1 on 1 Jul 2015; causing a re-direction of the camera; locked one of Johns' cats in an extremely hot garage before John rescued her on this same day; then ultimately retaliated against John by ordering a non-organic pesticide company to douse the residence with more dangerous unwanted chemicals on 3 Jul 2015; instead of using Orange Oil as John had discussed with his father. (UPDATE / 4 July 2015: it turns out Kris lied about the exterminator showing up on Friday. Kris is also a compulsive liar).

NOTE: Recently, Dow Chemical Co., the manufacturer of sulfuryl fluoride (Vikane), announced a new program on Sustainable Products and Solutions at the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley in partnership with the Haas School and the College of Chemistry. UC Berkeley got a $2 million gift from Dow to research sustainable chemicals. > Go To: http://www.sfgate.com/homeandgarden/article/Skeptical-of-Cal-s-orange-oil-study-3171228.php

THE BOTTOM LINE: Dangerous non-sustainable pesticides and/or herbicides need to be taken off the market due to their dangerous toxicity; and the federal government should force the corporations who create them to start developing newer, safer products that do not cause cancer etc. For instance; how many pallets of carcinogenic Roundup are being inadvertently dumped into our waterways?

GO TO: Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Probably Causes Cancer [UPDATED] @ http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2015/03/monsanto-herbicide-cause-cancer +

1) Pesticides: What You Need to Know @ http://www.nrdc.org/health/pesticides/ + 2) Pesticides and animal health @ http://npic.orst.edu/health/animhealth.html + 3) Do You Make This Cancer-Inducing Pet Care Mistake @ http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2014/02/10/lawn-pesticides.aspx + 4) Home Pets and garden @ http://www.panna.org/your-health/home-pets-garden

 

QUESTION: If Kris attempted vandalizing surveillance cameras at Sunnyvale D.P.S (for instance); she would likely be arrested; and/or if a minority youth did the exact same thing they would likely be arrested as well. Is there some kind advantage to being a Caucasian woman with lots of money? And if so; is this considered to be 'equality'?

> SEE ALSO: KRIS DAVY: INCIDENT #EV 15118 237 | VANDALISM + PROPERTY THEFT ETC @  http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/04/kris-clefstad-incident-ev-15118-237.html