(not necessarily in order of occurrence):
Preface: "A civil right is an enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury. Examples of civil rights are freedom of speech, press, and assembly; the right to vote; freedom from involuntary servitude; and the right to equality in PUBLIC places." > go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/civil_rights
2) IN THE BEGINNING
This shows how the City of Sunnyvale initially tried to cover-up it’s plans for an extremely questionable development in the Peterson Middle School field that never happened due to Johns’ valiant activist efforts.
3) INCIDENT #EV-98-112345 / MISTER STRUBLE
This was the initial incident in which John was nearly run over and attacked by a neighbor. John called the Sunnyvale police after being attacked by Mister Struble; when officer Beninger turned on John and instead conspired with The Strubles’ to further violate Johns’ civil rights..
4) OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA
After being attacked by Doug Ward at the Oasis Nightclub and speaking to a female Sunnyvale police officer about returning to the Oasis Nightclub to gather surveillance footage of the attack on John by Doug Ward; John then returned to the Oasis Nightclub the following week; then called the Sunnyvale police as discussed the previous week with an apparent female desk officer.
Officers Ochoa and Smith responded to Johns’ call; then proceeded to ignore and/or suppress exculpatory evidence that would have exonerated John; and in turn gotten Doug Ward into trouble. Instead officers Ochoa and Smith responded to Johns’ call for help at the Oasis Nightclub; then gave John an unlawful order that ultimately violated Johns’ in/unalienable rights and/or civil liberties and/or civil rights by ejecting John from the nightclub; allowing John to be wrongfully discriminated against; denying John of income by disallowing further karaoke recordings which John had obtained a business license for > go to: https://www.youtube.com/LREVIDEOGRAPHY2
After filing two claim forms to the City of Sunnyvale; apparently Doug got tipped off and fled to Nevada to avoid charges being pressed against him.
John had been sending emails to officer Jim Carrell for about one year prior to the following “POLICE-SANCTIONED GANG ACTIVITY (CONTINUED)” event (seen below X). And while officer Carrell was the best Sunnyvale police officer John dealt with over time; officer Jim Carrell did not take any action to help John after this initial event.
X) SANTA CLARA & SUNNYVALE POLICE-SANCTIONED GANG ACTIVITY ETC
Another cover up apparent occurred when John posted video X: “SANTA CLARA COPS' SONS STALKING, 'INTIMIDATING' A WITNESS AND MAKING CRIMINAL THREATS?” (seen above). About one week after posting the above video; a SWAT team descended upon John residence in apparently retaliation for bringing attention to his woes.
John believes Santa Clara police officer Don Paolinetti was behind this particular SWAT team intervention as a way to cover up Jake Paolinetti’s various abuses and criminalize John in the process. > go to video Y: “NEIGHBORHOOD COPWATCH: RESIDENCE ALMOST STORMED AND 'SUSPECT' SHOT AT FOR PICKING UP LITTER?” Note: one of the Sunnyvale officers ended up shooting at John; who was unarmed at the time.
Z) POLICE-SANCTIONED GANG ACTIVITY (CONTINUED)...
NOTE: After the various aforementioned XYZ cover ups; the stalking and harassment and menacing of John continued unabated...
===
“uninvolved” wrote on You Tube 1 year ago in reply to Rossoccer44:
“Um, from what I can tell there is a gang of asshole teens that pervade this area. Additionally, protected by asshole parents. From these videos, I can't imagine this hippy continuing to harass the teens if they would just apologize and stop harassing him. Why haven't the parents stopped this? This man seems to be doing good things for the community. Volunteering time to pick up litter to be accused of carrying a firearm? Constantly yelled at in the early mornings? I would not move there.”
“Clearly you have had to deal with entitled little brats in your neighborhood. Driving around their huge gas-guzzlers their daddy's paid for and making burn-outs and speeding through the neighborhood with no consideration for children at play. Constantly badgering a harmless hippy with homophobic slurs (clearly some kind of projection). These immature brats are just indicative of the terrible parents that don't know how to discipline their bratty little kids.”
“Also, the fact these children's parents haven't talked to their kids about leaving the harmless hippy alone and to perhaps apologize is indicative of terrible asshole parents as well. I sincerely hope these terrible people have their comeuppance. I'm sorry what you've had to deal with and I would certainly come to your defense if I lived in your area in such situations. Continue to care about your community, you're doing just fine.”
===
8) PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF EVENTS
This is a prime example of the depth of prior knowledge the Sunnyvale police department had regarding the criminal activity John was experiencing over time; beyond the various emails sent to officer Jim Carrell.
10) INCIDENT ON DUNFORD WAY | 14 FEBRUARY 2013
After John brought forward information regarding dangerous traffic conditions on Dunford Way to the City of Sunnyvale; yet another cover up occurred.
11) STATE LAW CROSSWALK SIGNS NEEDED NOW!
This video has been posted for almost 4 years now with NO ACTION TAKEN by the City of Santa Clara to fix the problem. Note: Humans and animals alike will benefit from extra traffic calming at this particular intersection; including a new neighbor who lives across the street from John -- a neighbor who has two young kitties who frequently cross Dunford Way.
THIS TRAFFIC CIRCLE IN SUNNYVALE TOOK NEARLY 13 TO BE INSTALLED
13) SUSPECT LEAVING THREATENING MESSAGE ON DOORSTEP
Sunnyvale police responded to this event then left the scene; taking no action to find the prowler. QUESTION: Is this undercover officer "Peck"?
14) QUESTIONABLE USE OF DASH CAMERAS
Two separate times Sunnyvale police responded to Johns' calls; then suspiciously told John to step out of the way of the dash cameras likely to suppress evidence.
15) JOHNS' OLD BUDDY CRAIG
Johns’ old buddy Craig Catanese has had a problem neighbor peering over his fence and menacing him for quite years now (John has witnessed this menacing). One day Craig went to the neighbors’ house in question to try to calm him down and talk it over; only to be chased down the block with a knife by this particular neighbor. Ths Los Gatos police responded and failed to arrest Craigs’ neighbor. (This event was witnessed by Craigs’ girlfriend. Craigs’ girlfriend was married to a police officer who did methamphetamines and physically abused her over time; causing her to become an alcoholic. She is now totally sober after intensive treatment).
Note: This segment adds perspective; in that this kind of half-assed police work goes on in other places within Santa Clara County as well -- see: ETC.
16) CATLYN HOLLYWOOD ASSAULTED?
Catlyn Hollywood was at the Oasis Nightclub one night when she was allegedly pushed up against a wall and assaulted by a club patron. Catlyn then called the Sunnyvale police; and alerted John of the assault; causing Catlyn, John and Catlyns’ friends to follow the suspect over to The Patio bar next door. The Sunnyvale police responded to the call and took no action to apprehend the suspect.
18) THE FBI: ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT?
Note: John called the FBI several times asking for assistance with no action taken by the FBI.
19) ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT
19A) HOW 'GREEN' WILL APPLES' NEW CUPERTINO SPACESHIP BE?
After emailing the City of Cupertino for many months regarding the presence of vulnerable wildlife at the new Cupertino “Mainstreet” development; no action was taken by the City of Cupertino to protect the wildlife in question. See also:19B) below...
19B) APPLE IS PRETENDING TO BE GREEN!?
Note: This segment adds perspective; in that this kind of irresponsible activity goes on
other places in Santa Clara County as well. (see: ETC)
20) THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA + 1333 LAWRENCE EXPRESSWAY + THE MARINA PLAYA APARTMENTS ETC = LAX ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ETC
The City of Santa Clara lied when they claimed the 1333 Lawrence Expressway was an artificial pond in the year 2000. The pond in question was actually an old stretch of the old Calabazas Creek; and was full of rare wildlife and/or endangered fish who were trapped in the pond when it was constructed. Note: All life in the 1333 Lawrence Expressway pond was destroyed for the new development; and an ancient 100 foot + tall tree with a 20 foot trunk was removed as well.
Note: Homeland Security laws require water retention ponds in case of seismic activity and/or other natural disasters which might compromise water pressure in underground pipelines.
Sometime after posting the video in question; John was later given an unlawful order by the Sunnyvale police department (for essentially making a video and/or taking photos of someone mowing a lawn?!?); ordering John to stay off the Peterson field property; therefore violating Johns’ voting rights in the process.
SEE ALSO:
24) VOTER INTIMIDATION?
25) VOTER INTIMIDATION: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OR ALL RIGHTS REVERSED?
26) WOODHAMS LOUNGE BARTENDER RETALIATION
After being attacked and wrongfully ejected from Woodhams Lounge in San Jose, John was then ejected from the club as retaliation for calling the police. John later found the following virus-infected email sent by the bartender and/or owner of Woodhams Lounge.
27) JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO, JUNIOR
After John called the City of Santa Clara about Mister Olenak trying to poison neighborhood ducks with bleach; three Santa Clara police officers (including Gabby Seagrave and Pablo Lopez) responded even though John did not call the police. Mister Olenak was angry about being exposed; then made criminal threats that he later followed up on and admitted to.
View the complaint filed by John:
http://likroper.com/SCAN0027.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0026.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0027.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0029.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0030.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0031.JPG --http://likroper.com/SCAN0032.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0033.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0034.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0035.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0036.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0037.JPG --http://likroper.com/SCAN0038.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0039.JPG
> In a nutshell: John was repeatedly and continually harassed for a number of years since getting involved in Sunnyvale politics and/or filing a complaint against the Santa Clara Police department in 2007; where it appears John was ambushed by two vehicles laying in wait for him to return home; an ambush that was ultimately foiled by the high speed John was traveling on his bicycle at the time; and a cell phone deployed during the drive-by attack -- a cell phone which took no photos but which worked as a deterrent to scatter the criminals involved in this malicious late-night vandalism and near vehicular manslaughter. John is about 99 percent certain the individuals involved in the night time attack were essentially put up to it by rogue members of the Santa Clara police department (Pablo Lopez; Don Paolinetti etc) seeking revenge for John's complaint filing.
Note: Adding to this; the Rebholtz family's daughter (who was also involved in the harassment and/or stalking of John > go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/stalking-by-rebholtzs-daughter.html) used what was essentially a false flag incident with segment and/or incident Y (seen above) adding on an extra layer of negligence; in that incident Y then spiraled out of control and turned into the opportunistic false allegations by the Rebholtz's daughter; allegations she obvious made up based around false flag incident seen in segment Y.
27A) 1) QUESTIONABLE RESTRAINING ORDER COPIES -- these are copies of the temporary restraining order issued by Mrs. Rebholtz etc; clearly showing how John made a concerted effort to bring an end to the harassment he was experiencing for a number of years at that time. > go to: http://likroper.com/SCAN0008.JPG + http://likroper.com/SCAN0006.JPG + http://likroper.com/SCAN0007.JPG --
How could this obvious evidence of John being
harassed up to one year before this event have been overlooked? -- This court
file is OBVIOUS evidence of the harassment John experienced; so why did the
court system not act upon this at the onset and set try to the record straight?
Did the judge even read the transcripts? And if so; how could he have
overlooked this evidence? It is obvious the Rebholtz family conspired and/or colluded with Officer Don Paolinetti and/or the members of the Paolinetti family to cover up and/or suppress evidence regarding what had been happening to John for over a year at that time.
NOTE: while this is not
necessarily about appealing the (sham) restraining order seen above; if there is any appeal of
sorts of the questionable June 2011 restraining order served; it would be in
the bait-and-switch nature of it where it clearly says that John "cannot
come near the house" (which John only did one time last year to tell Mrs
Rebholtz of the harassment John had been experiencing over the years) >
conflicted by another part of the order which says John can come over to the
house and talk to them if done in a civil manner (which he has no intentions of
ever doing and only did to tell her to get her idiot sons away from his house). This is a confusing dialogue that could easily turn ugly if
followed -- John had to do what he did on that June 2011 day to end the
harassment ; as nothing else would have stopped it; as the Sunnyvale police
absolutely REFUSED to do their job for many years; and THIS (sham) RESTRAINING ORDER WAS JUST ANOTHER PART OF THE COVER UP. Therefore; part of our
in/unalienable rights as American citizens is the right to protect our
property; a right which no living being can be denied.
27A-X) STALKING AND HARASSMENT (CONTINUED) > These two videos show recent suspicious activity and/or disturbing of the peace and/or harassment and/or targeted stalking. On 23 August, 2014 the lone driver of the vehicle seen in the http://www.likroper.com/23AUG2014.wmv video drove up and down Thunderbird Avenue honking his horn up and down the entire street before exiting on Dunford Way. This appeared not to be directed at anyone in particular; but instead everyone in general who lives on the street. The 9 and 12 September 2014 incidents @ http://likroper.com/9_12SEP2014X_0001.wmv show a dark black vehicle leaving the Rebholtz residence (see license plate below). The driver loudly revved the engine outside John's residence at around 9:30 PM on 9 September 2014; followed by two motorcycles exiting the Rebholtz residence in Doon Court. On 12 September 2014; the same individual left the Rebholtz residence and drove by revving his engine very loudly once again; awakening John and causing him to call the Sunnyvale DPS to report the incident. > http://www.likroper.com/23AUG2014.wmv + http://www.likroper.com/9_12SEP2014X_0001.wmv
UPDATE 12 SEP 2014 -- This is the license number relating to the 9 and 12 September 2014 incidents. The driver of this car witnessed John taking this photo; therefore John suspects these latest disturbances were an attempt to intimidate a witness (John); even though John was not intimidated. Note: It is unlawful to intimidate a witness. Also; this incident was not necessarily a "coverup" as it seems the culture within the Sunnyvale DPS is changing in that the responding phone officer seemed to understand and care about John's situation in a way that John has not experienced before.
CIVIL HARASSMENT: (1) "Course of conduct" is a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose, including following or stalking an individual, making harassing telephone calls to an individual, or sending harassing correspondence to an individual by any means, including, but not limited to, the use of public or private mails, interoffice mail, facsimile, or COMPUTER email. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
(3) "Harassment" is unlawful violence, a credible threat of violence, or a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, or harasses the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose. The course of conduct must be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and must actually cause substantial emotional distress to the petitioner.
> See more @ http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/CCP/3/2/7/3/s527.6#sthash.ayb9EzTM.dpuf + http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/CCP/3/2/7/3/s527.6
27B) OFFICER ODLE -- In early October of 2011; a Sunnyvale police officer named "Odle" came by John's house one morning. Officer Odle said John's videos @ http://youtube.com/LREVIDEOGRAPHY were the subject of a morning police briefing (President Obama was in town; so local government was likely hastily trying to appear like they were actually doing their jobs for once) John spoke to Officer Odle about the events which had transpired over the last few years; and Officer Odle ended up giving a ticket to the vehicle seen below (see photo); Officer Odle had been experiencing the same kind of harassment; so he seemed truly concerned about John's situation. But despite Officer Odle's valiant actions; this was still just a bandaid that need to be put over a gaping 5 year old wound -- Question: Officer Odle promised to go to the Paolinetti's house and talk to Jake Paolinetti's father, did Officer Odle ever do this? > Photo of the vehicle Officer Odle ticketed for not being street legal (below)
27C) SUNNYVALE POLICE ATTEMPT TO CHANGE A REPORTERS' STORY -- The Sunnyvale police sent a friendly officer to Johns' house (officer Odle) to get John to change his you tube story after featuring Johns' you tube web site at the Sunnyvale police briefing that same morning -- John originally wrote "POLICE-SPONSORED STALKING AND HARASSMENT" on top of some of the you tube videos @ http://youtube.com/LREVIDEOGRAPHY causing officer Odle to ask John if he would change the title to take out the police-sponsored reference. But after so many years of having this abuse happening to John; and a police officers' son essentially using a police officers' vehicle to harass and stalk John etc; the local police departments (by default) are now in a very large sense responsible for the nightmare John experienced for so many years > AND WHILE ONE REPORTER MAY BE BACKING DOWN (see link below) JOHN IS CLEARLY NOT -- In a very large sense; John was fooled by officer Odle into thinking officer Odle actually cared about Johns' situation; when all he really wanted John to do was change the title of his You Tube video to cover up appearance of any wrong doing on their part. > http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/local-govt-politics/reporter-wont-sue-berkeley-police-chief/nLQZH/
28) JOHN'S NEIGHBOR JANE / CASE #13-3093
Why did officers Smith and Ochoa fail to gather surveillance footage showing the attack on John that night at the Oasis Nightclub? Why did they tell John he would be trespassing if he returned to the club; when John had recently/allegedly been attacked by karaoke host Doug? Can anyone say "ignoring exculpatory evidence?"
29) THE PAOLINETTI FAMILY: FLIGHT RISK?
After apparently losing his job in law enforcement; the Paolinetti family then fled the scene of their crimes by selling their house and moving out of the neighborhood.
Note: "Jake Paolinetti is clearly NOT entitled to the
qualified immunity available to government officials; as the legal principle to
bar Jakes' illegal and threatening conduct is clearly pre-established. Also;
no court has ever recognized a First Amendment right for ANY citizen to be free
from retaliatory non-arrest with probable cause; nor was such a right otherwise
clearly established at the time of Jakes' non-arrest. And while it has been
pre-established that government officials may not be sued under the First
Amendment for retaliatory prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue
prosecution; the question remains whether government officials CAN be sued
under the First Amendment for retaliatory non-prosecutions where there was
probable cause to pursue prosecution."
30) INCIDENT ON 15 DECEMBER 2013 -- EV 133490020
On 15 December 2013 at around 2 am (the surveillance footage is roughly one hour ahead due to the recent time change) John called the Sunnyvale 911 emergency phone line after hearing his doorbell ring; then hung it up to call the non-emergency line instead. The 911 operator called John back; so John then stepped outside as he talked to a 911 operator. But as John got down the street the wireless signal to his LAND LINE PHONE weakened and cut off in the middle of the conversation. John then called back and asked for assistance again; and this time the second operator told John that an officer would eventually arrive; but the officer never arrived. John then downloaded the relatively short surveillance segment showing the incident. The video of the incident in question can be viewed @ http://likroper.com/15DEC2013_25512AM.wmv
31) ARE YOU BEING DELPHIED?
CITY OF SANTA CLARA COVER UP: After John was attacked by Mister Olenak (who finally followed up on threats ultimately ignored by the Santa Clara police) Santa Clara police officers Gabby Seagrave and Pablo Lopez conspired to further violate John's civil rights by not only failing to arrest Mister Olenak for his violent attack; but John's father had his civil rights violated as well by being illegally held against his will then threatened by Santa Clara police OFFICERS Seagrave and Lopez at the end of this very same bogus SHAM TRIAL regarding duck feeding. A bogus administrative hearing where Mr. Olenak admitted to his attack on John in front of not only Judge Louis Amadeo, Jr.; but also officers Seagrave and Lopez; and several other witnesses as well. And because of this; Johns' 80+ year old father no longer visits his wife's grave site because he not only does not trust the Santa Clara police department; but any police department for that matter; and especially after all the extra layers of bullshit Sunnyvale police later added to this stinking, government shit pile.
NOTE: Johns' mother died when John was but 10 years old; and his brother Carl died in a head-on collision returning home on Christmas eve 1999; but since John was given UNLAWFUL ORDERS VIOLATING HIS CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES (which John has TOTALLY IGNORED) by Santa Clara police officers Seagrave and Lopez at a SHAM TRIAL regarding Johns' government sanctioned duck feeding; JOHNS' FATHER NO LONGER VISITS THIS GRAVE SITE BECAUSE HE DOES NOT TRUST THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT!?! (NOTE: ex-Santa Clara Mayor Judy Nadler told John at a City Council meeting that he could IN FACT feed the ducks the City of Santa Clara ILLEGALLY DISPLACED).
QUESTIONS: Why did the Ron Diridon of the Santa Clara City Clerk's office promise John video footage of John's year 2000 Santa Clara City Council meeting appearance where ex-Santa Clara Mayor Judy Nadler gave John permission to feed ducks; then fail to provide the footage; providing text only? And why did the Santa Clara City Council mass-destroy countless City Council meeting videos after Patricia Mahan was caught on camera making fun of constituents she represents? (see: destroying evidence and/or suppressing evidence etc) And why would it be considered a criminal act by the City of Santa Clara for John to continue feeding ducks; but NOT a criminal act to physically attack and/or harass and/or menace John and/or vandalize property that belongs to John?
32) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF EVENTS AND/OR ILLEGALLY SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE BY THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT IN JUNE 2010 AND/OR THE SUNNYVALE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN JUNE 2011 > http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/prior-knowledge-of-events-andor.html > The Santa Clara police department retaliated against John by attempted to criminalize John for bringing his unusual situation to the publics' attention. This proves the Santa Clara police department -- as well as the Rebholtz family -- was complicit in covering up this situation roughly one year before it got out of hand in June of 2011.
33) NIGHT TIME HARASSMENT #1 > http://likroper.com/IMG_0528.gif > This was the very first time John was awakened in the middle of the night by stalkers. John called the Sunnyvale police; who responded and proceeded to let the suspects go; emboldening them and causing several more months of harassment by these same suspects. The suspect on the left wearing the grey shirt grew up a bit and later apologized to John for his questionable actions.
34) GOVERNMENT INCOMPETENCE #34 -- Perhaps the most glaring example of incompetence lies within the various times George Hills Incorporated ignored exculpatory evidence apparently on the behalf of local governments. Several claim forms and/or claims against the city have been submitted to the Cities of Sunnyvale and/or Santa Clara through George Hills Incorporated; all of which contained actionable evidence than can be found within this particular blog posting; but NO ACTION was ever taken to correct any of these situations!?
Note: It appears George Hills Incorporated acts more as a cover up agency for these localities than anything else. And this --- my 'good' people -- IS UNACCEPTABLE.
35) 9-11 CONSPIRACY SOLVED? NAMES, CONNECTIONS & DETAILS EXPOSED?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hhBZJEqoe0A > Many individuals have been affected by the lies put forth to the American public after the 9-11 event; including all residents of Sunnyvale and/or Santa Clara, California. (through mass surveillance programs etc) Furthermore; If the facts within this particular video are truthful; that means the USA Patriot Act and all other legislative activity connected to and/or inspired by the official government version of this apparent false-flag event are now in question.
35a) DISPOSITION MATRIX? -- Excerpt from a Guardian UK article: "What has been created here - permanently institutionalized - is a highly secretive executive branch agency that simultaneously engages in two functions: (1) it collects and analyzes massive amounts of surveillance data about all Americans without any judicial review let alone search warrants, and (2) creates and implements a "matrix" that determines the "disposition" of suspects, up to and including execution, without a whiff of due process or oversight. It is simultaneously a surveillance state and a secretive, unaccountable judicial body that analyzes who you are and then decrees what should be done with you, how you should be "disposed" of, beyond the reach of any minimal accountability or transparency." > http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/oct/24/obama-terrorism-kill-list
Question: what did the federal government know about the situation John was experiencing through the years 2007 and 2011 through the use of the Disposition Matrix and/or other similar intelligence gathering methods? For more information regarding these questionable incidents; A Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A) inquiry must first be submitted to the federal government to see if they had any prior knowledge of Johns' situation as well...
SEE ALSO: WHISTLEBLOWER AWARD - Jacob Appelbaum answers for Edward Snowden @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW8lRCqYI6U + Jacob Applebaum's speech at a demonstration against BND and NSA in Berlin @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNs7fS2Msh8
FEDERAL PATTERN AND PRACTICE LAWSUIT?: It doesn't matter who is in the White House; as they tend to feel above the law due to whoever they strategically placed within the attorney General position and/or the Supreme Court and/or the General Accounting Office at any given time. This kind of questionable partisan political activity needs to be officially curtailed somehow.
As our federal government psychotically swings back and forth between Republican and/or Democratic leadership; a clear pattern of legal abuse and/or civil rights violations occurs no matter who is in power at any given time. Therefore; a pattern and practice lawsuit needs to be filed against the federal government to get to the bottom of this "psychotic" nonsense; allowing all people -- regardless of political affiliation -- to be protected from partisan legal abuse...
Various incidents listed in this particular blog post strongly suggest government is clearly incapable of handling their own affairs and/or incompetent in general; therefore it is not clear whether or not government is competent enough to stand trial in this case. Therefore; a quick settlement is probably the best plan of action.
EXAMPLES OF PARTISAN GOVERNMENT MALFEASANCE: 1) OPERATION NORTHWOODS @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods + 2) U.S. GOVERNMENT'S 911 COVERUP FALLING APART @ http://www.rense.com/general46/911V.HTM + THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS ENGAGED IN A SERIES OF NUCLEAR COVER-UPS EVER SINCE HIROSHIMA @ http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-us-government-has-engaged-in-a-series-of-nuclear-cover-ups-ever-since-hiroshima/5372120 + COVERT ACTIVITIES AND COVER-UPS MOST PEOPLE ARE NOT AWARE OF @ http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/covert_activities_and_coverups.htm + HAARP FACT SHEET @ http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/haarp_index.htm + U.S. GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AND COVERUPS EXPOSED @ http://renegademovement.webs.com/ + GO TO: X
36) CIVIL RIGHTS -- In 1868 the Fourteenth Amendment stated that no state "shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United States... [or] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, [or] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." > See U.S. Const. amend. XIV. Section Five of the Fourteenth Amendment which gave Congress the power by section five of the Fourteenth Amendment to pass any laws needed to enforce the Amendment. During the reconstruction era that followed, Congress enacted numerous civil rights statutes. Many of these are still in force today and protect individuals from discrimination and from the deprivation of their civil rights.
A civil right is an enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury. Examples of civil rights are freedom of speech, press, and assembly; the right to vote; freedom from involuntary servitude; and the right to equality in public places. Discrimination occurs when the civil rights of an individual are denied or interfered with because of their membership in a particular group or class.
Note: the financially prohibitive nature of the justice system within the United States creates a "class-based financial discrimination" which in effect disallows participation by those who cannot afford decent legal representation -- therefore violating the civil rights of countless low income individuals in the process.
Section 1981 of Title 42 (Equal Rights Under the Law) protects individuals from discrimination based on race in making and enforcing contracts, participating in lawsuits, and giving evidence. See 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Other statutes, derived from acts of the reconstruction era, that protect against discrimination include: Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights (See 42 U.S.C. § 1983); Conspiracies to Interfere With Civil Rights (See 42 U.S.C. § 1985); Conspiracy Against Rights of Citizens (See 18 U.S.C. § 241); Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, (See 18 U.S.C. § 242); The Jurisdictional Statue for Civil Rights Cases (See 28 U.S.C. § 1443); and Peonage Abolished (See 42 U.S.C. § 1994).
GO TO: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/civil_rights
